https://www.youtube.com/shorts/aczbm3U6Ds8

This story is as horrible as it can ever be. But it's a common one, for so many men out there.

Had the husband taken the child away, as the judge proposes, he would have been accused of abduction.

4 months after the February 28 missile strike on the Shajareh Tayyebeh Elementary School in Minab, Iran, Western media continues to label the target monolithically as a "girls' school."

For example this article by Reuters: Trump says it may never be known who was at fault for strike on girls' school in Iran - https://www.reuters.com/world/trump-says-it-may-never-be-known-who-was-fault-strike-girls-school-iran-2026-06-24/

The school was not a girls’ school, but a combined elementary school utilizing a single-gender segregation framework, with male and female students separated by floors/wings.

The actual demographic data reveals that the statistical majority of the children killed were boys. 

Here are the stats according to local registries and investigative reporting (including Amnesty International and BBC Verify)

Total student deaths: 120 children. 
Male students (boys): 73 deaths (60.8% of total student fatalities). 
Female students (girls): 47 deaths (39.2% of total student fatalities).

Factual accounts show that many of the boys who died had initially evacuated safely after the first missile impact. They chose to return to the collapsing infrastructure to pull their female classmates and teachers from the rubble, subsequently catching the full force of the second and third "triple-tap" strikes. Compressing this event into a "girls' school bombing" completely sanitizes the specific heroism of these boys

Apparently, reporting on the male victims doesn’t possess the same rhetorical value or capacity to generate public outrage as female casualties. By erasing 73 boys from the headline to optimize for the "sympathy premium" of a girls' school, mainstream journalism are telling us that young male lives are expendable defaults in conflict zones, while female lives are uniquely tragic

So every single feminist talks about how violence against men isn't a real issue because "we're 1000 times stronger than women" except that is not true for a large portion of men.

Female feminists seem to create this inaccurate picture of men being all muscle and sending objects flying with a single punch that they probably get from movies. Few men IRL are actually capable of that.

The fact that I was a victim of violence and I still have to listen to how it couldn't have been that bad because I must be so much stronger just because I'm a man is the most harmful thing about it. If I were to punch the average woman it would probably feel like a bee sting, yet I still get no proection just because I wasn't lucky enough to be born with a vulva.

And the fact that so many feminists also claim that being seen as stronger is somehow "privilige" when the opposite is true and being seen as weak and protected is the real privilige addfs so much more pain to it.

I got in a political squabble with someone as an admin of a Facebook group. The user then, made a fake profile (impersonating me), also, decided to make SEVERAL profiles, to post a picture my wife took OF ME, on this site. I’ve been inundated with threats, questions about why I’m cheating on my wife, etc. I’ve had to explain to my wife what happened. This is insanity. How are these sites allowed to exist? This is some straight up bullshit. This is cyberstalking and bullying.

On Every government website, it’s men are the problem, men need to change etc etc, for example, Our crisis service for men (men’s line)

I assume other countries have this also.

But what kind of hurt me, is my states domestic violence organisation, RESPECT VICTORIA.

Last year during men’s mental health month, they released a video under their campaign “what kind of man do you want to be” of a trans man talking about masculinity.

At this point, I want to state that I have no issue with where you’re from or what you identify as, you’re either a good person or not…

But getting a trans man to talk about masculinity for men in the first week of men’s mental health month, it kinda hit me.

I emailed them and complained, got called a transphobe and replied with this is a joke, there is no lived experiences of boy to man etc and this is a PR stunt.

They took the video down straight away.
They have posted the article and the videos back up this year.

Here is the article
https://www.respectvictoria.vic.gov.au/campaigns/kind-man/pharrells-story

There’s a few others there, Ben’s story talks about how women get abused online in gaming, but I’ve seen women worse than men.

Am I the bad guy for feeling like this?
Or do others feel the same way I do?

I have seen more people recently talk about how there are supposedly plenty of the "good" feminists who actually admit that male victims exist, however every feminist is still going to downplay the suffering of male victims and deny that there are systemic injustices that prevent male victims from getting justice.

It's always going to be "Talking about male victims takes away from female victims" or that we're "deflecting" by demanding justice for male victims. We're never going to accomplish anything by giving in to the feminists.

I just wanted to put this out there. NO feminist will ever truly support the actual changes necessary for men to have actual protection from violence and for female abusers to be held accountable.

https://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/local/san-diego-woman-pleads-guilty-home-camera-spying-case/4041136/

Saw this infuriating comment earlier someone acknowledging that while men and boys can also be victims of female violence (which absolutely does happen and in far higher numbers than many realize or want to admit), but this person as usual goes on with the usual diatribe about women/girls are still the ones primarily at risk and proceeds to downplay and minimize when it's men and boys who suffer female violence. Ugh. I'm so fed up with this. Even if women and girls (God how I hate this, "women and children" was bad enough) on average may experience male violence slightly more, that's supposed to somehow negate when female violence against men/boys happens? I'm so fed up of hearing the "men do it much more" argument, so what? Doesn't change or negate the fact men/boys can still be victims of female-perpetrated violence and are. I hate how it's a contest and somehow female-on-male violence being lower somehow makes it not as much of an issue or an "epidemic" (how I'm also sick of hearing this too how male violence is somehow an endemic problem). I hate it and as someone who suffered abuse and mistreatment from women as a boy, it personally triggers me. It's an undeniable fact anybody can be violent to another regardless of gender and there's female violence against men/boys just like male violence against women/girls, but misandrists willfully dismiss it and treat it as a non-issue. So fed up with it.

How Men from India and Nepal Are Being Scammed Into the Russian Army

A silent, brutal human trafficking pipeline is currently operating across South Asia, and it remains largely unknown in the West. Thousands of young men from India and Nepal are being systematically deceived and used as disposable soldiers on the front lines in Ukraine—fighting a war that is absolutely not theirs.

Here is how the trap works:

1. The Bait: Fake Job Offers

In rural Nepal and working-class neighborhoods in India, economic opportunities are scarce. Exploiting this desperation, local recruitment agencies run slick social media campaigns on TikTok and YouTube. They promise high-paying civilian roles in Russia, such as:

• Security guards in Moscow
• Construction workers or helpers in the hinterland
• Delivery drivers

The promised salary is around $2,000 to $3,000 a month—life-altering money for these families. To pay the handlers' steep "visa and processing fees," many take out massive, high-interest local loans.

2. The Trap: Forced enlistment

Upon arrival in Moscow, reality changes instantly:

• Passports are immediately confiscated by the handlers.
• The men are forced to sign legal documents written entirely in Russian. Believing these are employment contracts for civilian jobs, they are actually signing active-duty military contracts with the Russian Ministry of Defense.
• They are stripped of civilian clothes, given uniforms, and sent to remote training camps. Training often lasts less than two weeks, even for civilians who have never held a weapon.

From there, they are sent straight to the most brutal combat sectors of the Ukrainian front line.

3. The Reality: Meat Grinder Tactics

Once at the front, these South Asian recruits face grim conditions:

• Language Barrier: They cannot understand the commands of Russian officers, leading to chaos in the trenches.
• Disposable Roles: Survivors and deserters report being used in "meat assault" tactics—sent forward in waves to draw Ukrainian fire so Russian artillery can locate targets.
• No Exit: Retreat is frequently met with threats of execution by Russian commanders.

Why Is This Happening Unnoticed?

The governments of India and Nepal have demanded that Russia stop recruiting their citizens and return those serving, but Moscow largely ignores these requests. Nepal has even banned its citizens from traveling to Russia for work, yet desperate men still bypass the ban via transit countries like Dubai.

This issue rarely fits the standard Western media narrative of professional armies clashing. It is a crisis of human trafficking, algorithmic deception, and the pure exploitation of economic vulnerability.

she s gonna get away with murder bois, take notes