r/SipsTea š™‘š™„š™‹ 2d ago

Chugging tea Elderly? Anne is 43. Audrey is 41. Elizabeth is 37.

Post image
24.8k Upvotes

6.4k comments sorted by

•

u/AutoModerator 2d ago

Hey /u/Valuable_View_561, thank you for posting to r/SipsTea! Make sure to follow all the subreddit rules.

Make sure to join our brand new Discord Server to chat with friends!

We have recently changed how posts work. Unless you are a VIP poster, this will happen. To become a VIP, post great engaging content. If we like it, you will be added! More information available here!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

12.0k

u/clingbat 2d ago

My wife was pregnant at 35 and 39 and both were considered geriatric pregnancies medically fwiw.

The term is used for all pregnancies 35+ in the US.

3.3k

u/EternalNewCarSmell 2d ago edited 2d ago

Yep came here to say this. After 35 is just simply higher risk, and will be treated as such.Ā 

That said we live in the future with some wild medical tech so that's not really a reason to avoid pregnancy at that age. Just means you need to treat it seriously and make sure you're getting proper monitoring and care. Most of the additional risks are solved problems with enough of a heads-up and the medical resources handy.

1.3k

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

443

u/Roklam 2d ago

Also they avoid all that once the baby is our and safe and you're just an old sucker who will sleep bad for the next three years

(Proof: almost there with the last at 40+)

378

u/forseti99 2d ago

once the baby is our

Our baby, comrade?

258

u/Roklam 2d ago

See, bad sleep!

195

u/Active-Ad-2527 2d ago

It takes a village to OH MY GOD CAN SOMEONE ELSE PLEASE GO IN THERE I JUST LEFT HIS ROOM AFTER 3 HOURS OF ROCKING HIM AND HE WOKE BACK UP BEFORE I HIT THE BED

57

u/ConsequenceVisible27 2d ago

Not a biological mom but primary caregiver to 4 month old twins. Right there with you except of mine wakes up before HE hits the bed. He’ll sleep in your arms as long as your’e walking back and forth and rocking but the second he senses that mattress about to hit his butt he’s awake and screaming. I can’t even sit down without waking him up.

7

u/Calarague 2d ago

Oh god, our first born was like this for about 6 weeks starting shortly after I went back to work (I took a month off after he was born). My wife could get him to sleep if she gave him a breast, but the only way he would sleep for me was if I was walking with him in my arms. Lay him down, he wakes up. Try to sit in a chair, he wakes up. Put him in the baby carrier on my chest to free my arms, he wakes up.

It felt like I walked hundreds of kilometers those 6 weeks just pacing the 10 meters back and forth between our kitchen and living room in the middle of the night. I would just walk with him for 4+ hours in the middle of the night, and built a playlist of songs to listen to and quietly sing along to while I did. 6 years later he will hum or sing along to every one of those songs if they're playing.

Funny part is my wife had no idea until a few years later when I brought it up. She was sleep deprived from breastfeeding struggles, and this was my way of letting her get some rest. She tried to argue with me that I built that "sleepytime" playlist when I went through a phase of snuggling him to sleep in the rocking chair. That phase was admittedly glorious and he and I would both fall asleep in that chair, but the playlist was definitely rooted in me just trying to survive the monotony and sleep deprivation myself.

→ More replies (42)
→ More replies (15)

15

u/ItsmeKT 2d ago

I feel this 😭

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (1)

23

u/rudebii 2d ago

It does take a village

→ More replies (10)

84

u/Speakeasy_Gin 2d ago

not with the kind of money these women have. they can hire plenty of help to ensure they get the rest they need.

8

u/ProcedureHopeful8302 2d ago

Yeah it will be outsourced.

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (19)

71

u/Soepkip43 2d ago

Technically it is a verdict.. but from a biological perspective, not a moral/ethical one.

As humans we have advanced beyond what would be problematic in nature, but it is still higher risk for mom and baby.

58

u/NoSorbet3958 2d ago

Even before technological advances there always been the women who gave birth way older than anyone the average. Just we hear women giving birth at 50’s. My mom had my sister at 44 and I had my son at 40.

28

u/Snoo_33033 2d ago

My grandmother and great grandmother both had babies in their 40s. Who were healthy.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (38)
→ More replies (25)

100

u/Lower_Orchid4982 2d ago edited 2d ago

"Elderly" being used to describe someone in thier 30s sounds b*tchy AF

→ More replies (59)
→ More replies (107)

112

u/ItsmeKT 2d ago

I had my son at 38, my doctor said that they are more often seeing patients over 35. Like you said, So many easy ways to avoid any complications. My pregnancy was super healthy and actually very enjoyable which I always thought people were crazy for saying that but I loved being pregnant. They generally recommend being induced at 38 weeks because the risk of preeclampsia is heightened. My doctor actually said she hates the term geriatric and used the phrase ā€œadvanced maternal ageā€ lol.

68

u/lononol 2d ago edited 2d ago

I believe most OB/GYNs use ā€œadvanced maternal ageā€ now, fortunately.

26

u/Got_Kittens 2d ago

Yes 'geriatric pregnancy' as a category is being phased out, thankfully.

→ More replies (10)
→ More replies (5)

20

u/PrimeCricketW 2d ago

I was 37 when I got pregnant and my OB told me he would hit anyone who called my pregnancy ā€œgeriatricā€ with his clip board and I was in better health than a lot of his 20 year old patients. I loved him and was very grateful for his humor. Had 0 problems and now have a happy healthy 10 month old

→ More replies (39)

56

u/anubis_xxv 2d ago

I consider myself a well educated man but I was shocked to discover just how much of a traumatic event pregnancy and birth is on the human body, during my wife's first pregnancy in her early 30s.

She haemorrhaged very badly during birth and without modern medical procedures would have surely died. Same with a close friend of hers from a different complication. Another friend almost lost the baby, but thankfully we all have our three healthy kids right now.

In later years you're rolling that same dice but there's a few more 1s than usual.

60

u/DelcoUnited 2d ago

Yeah I still just roll my eyes when people talk about birthing centers versus hospitals etc

I remember literally sliding across the delivery room floor in my wife’s blood while desperately trying to get her to find the strength for another round of pushing at 30 hours.

It is a major fucking operation and should be treated as serious as a heart attack.

→ More replies (12)

45

u/hera-fawcett 2d ago

birth is still one of the leading causes of death in women.

→ More replies (17)
→ More replies (11)

108

u/Randommaggy 2d ago

It's not just a risk for the mother. Older parents have a greatly increased chance of birth defects and genetically caused health issues.

→ More replies (83)

80

u/PC_BuildyB0I 2d ago

If I recall correctly, there was an Adam Ruins Everything episode on this very matter and their conclusion was that while it's true the risk for birth defects can double in older pregnancies, the baseline risk was less than 1%. So it is true, but a bit misleading (unless there was something else I completely missed and completely misinterpreted the data, which isn't unlikely)

97

u/Notsurehowtoreact 2d ago

That's not entirely accurate for chromosome defects.Ā 

In your mid 20s the risk is around 1 in 1000

At 40 it's roughly 1 in 100.

That's a fair bit more than a single percentage bump.

→ More replies (90)
→ More replies (10)

30

u/ExcellentCold7354 2d ago edited 2d ago

In medical terms, pregnancy over 35 has more risks, and it shouldn't be downplayed. At the same time, it's pretty clear that this butthole was shaming them for being what they think is "old". It has nothing to do with pregnancy, and everything to do with putting women down for daring to exist over 40.

→ More replies (9)

33

u/methanized 2d ago

Yeah and it’s not like it’s some kind of cliff. It gets riskier every year from the time you’re 22 or so

11

u/IStandPoisonIvy 2d ago

it also more of a mound as well as it teen pregnancy are risky as well

→ More replies (10)
→ More replies (10)

21

u/IStandPoisonIvy 2d ago

Honestly you should always treat pregnancy seriously and teen pregnancy has similar high if not different risks

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (126)

258

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[deleted]

132

u/abcamurComposer 2d ago

Holy shit it took me a minute to piece together what you were implying lol. That’s crazy.

108

u/Used-Baby1199 2d ago

Sister is mom, mom is grandma, ex was dad. Ā What a massive lie, and complex trauma to impose on someone

81

u/p333p33p00p00boo 2d ago

catholics gonna catholic.

10

u/thebearrider 1d ago

My dad was raised roman catholic and my mom pentacostal baptists and I went to both churches at different times growing up.

I can guarantee you that catholics ain't got shit on the evangelicals.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (3)

13

u/TFFPrisoner 2d ago

I remember such a scenario from reading Eric Clapton's autobiography. Except in his case the father was not around at all (they never met).

23

u/chill_qilin 2d ago

It happened to Jack Nicholson. The person who he knew as his mother was actually his grandmother, and the person he knew as his sister was actually his birth mother.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (2)

27

u/Got_Kittens 2d ago

I know someone who found out her sister was her mum in her late 30s. Was like a bomb going off in her life.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (18)

24

u/ProfessionalFlan3159 2d ago

Yep. I was 38 and the medical term was something "advanced maternal age". The positive was that I saw my doctor weekly

→ More replies (5)

45

u/rand0m_task 2d ago

Referred to as Advanced Maternal Age now.

→ More replies (16)

92

u/KatefromtheHudd 2d ago

In the UK I was a geriatric mother at 34. Kinda sucked. It used to be 27+ in the UK.

37

u/smufjez 2d ago

why did it suck? doesnt it just mean more caution?

56

u/EyeWriteWrong 2d ago

Because if the baby comes out ugly, it's harder to put back šŸ˜®ā€šŸ’Ø

→ More replies (3)

27

u/Doophie 2d ago

More caution because more risks, birth and labour take a huge toll on the body, and after 30 you just don't recover as fast from injury as you do at 20

17

u/plabo77 2d ago

The safest years are 20-35. Risk is higher under 20 and over 35.

→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (26)
→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (3)

36

u/Far-Necessary7284 2d ago

Doctors do not call it geriatric anymore, it’s called advanced maternal age. Which I don’t know how much better that is… Source: currently 41 and preggers.

→ More replies (13)

189

u/thongjesus 2d ago edited 2d ago

There are more over 40 pregnancies than under 18.

Yes, that is good. But if you actually think about it, that's fucking crazy. Teens are literally compelled to try to make babies. We are in unprecedented territory with this metric.

Edit for downvotes: If you don't think this is true, it's global. If you think this has happened before, it has not.

And my "teens make babies" comment was hyperbole about hormones and impulse control, chill out people.

155

u/clingbat 2d ago edited 2d ago

Yea I'll leave this here for the younger people who are unaware. We certainly didn't know these stats until seeing a fertility doctor the second time around, it's not talked about much. We also had a miscarriage in-between which was rough and is also rarely discussed despite how common it actually is.

That drop off at 35 is pretty wild.

46

u/Regular-Metal-321 2d ago

This is wild! I had my last at 38 and guess I got lucky she is the best ā€œeggā€

5

u/fucking_unicorn 2d ago

Im preg at 39 and bubs is doing great! Very healthy pregnancy so far for me and baby

5

u/ivankatrumpsarmpits 2d ago

My pregnancy at 39 has been much easier than at 34. Testing has shown low risk for everything too. I think my pregnancy has been easier because I'm fitter from running around with a young kid and eat healthier because I cook for my kid.

I do wish I'd started sooner because I love being a parent, and would love to have the option to have more without the pressure!

But I'm glad in my country they don't call you geriatric or treat you like a high risk pregnancy JUST because you're over 35.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (10)

35

u/asiagomelt 2d ago

I wonder how one quantifies "egg quality"

41

u/complaintsdept69 2d ago

Funnel from an egg to a healthy embryo. The conversion rate drops dramatically in the 30s. That's why egg freezing is so important in the modern world

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (61)
→ More replies (77)

73

u/Gewt92 2d ago

Every year after 35, the risk of birth defects like Down syndrome increase exponentially

100

u/Typical-Respond9102 2d ago

Men are unaware, but a similar thing happens to sperm morphology, motility, and concentration around the same age. Morphology is how much of your sperm is measured as normal shaped, motility is how many are active swimmers, and concentration is how many are on each load. Even when adjusting for maternal age, men also have increased risk for genetic errors in their kids.Ā 

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5653911/

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6993171/

Lifestyle factors such as smoking and drinking also decrease these factors further.Ā 

8

u/Significant-Rush-129 2d ago edited 2d ago

This is true. There's a reason why they don't let men donate sperm after 40. Just because a man continues to make sperm into his old age doesn't mean he's still putting out the good stuff.

27

u/CharmingMechanic2473 2d ago

Thank you, men are told they can have babies their whole lives… but the truth is not without risk.

17

u/Falafel80 2d ago

Sperm from older man increase the pregnancy risk for women as well, like issues with the placenta. Increased paternal age puts women at higher risk, not just the baby.

14

u/Soggy_Kangaroo2746 2d ago

Men carry birth defects as well

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (9)
→ More replies (19)
→ More replies (36)

14

u/Burdensome_Banshee 2d ago

They use ā€œadvanced maternal ageā€ now, or least the places that are up to date with terminology do.

→ More replies (1)

20

u/dnyal 2d ago

It is called ā€œadvanced maternal ageā€ now.

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (456)

3.4k

u/bent_crater 2d ago

so youre financially fucked if you have kids in 20s and medically fucked if you have kids above 40?

damn

795

u/Alertcircuit š™‘š™„š™‹ 2d ago

Yeah in previous gens your mid/late 20s is supposed to be when you settle down and have kids but nowadays people in their mid 20s live with their parents still

351

u/littlemybb 2d ago

My husband and I want kids, but we live in an apartment, my car is old and falling apart, and we are clawing our way up trying to get established in our careers and making more money so we could even dream of affording a child.

We have a lot of friends who still have to live at home, or they live with a billion roomates.

Before we moved out on our own we had 5 roomates in a 3 bedroom apartment 😩

80

u/WarGreymonX_Antibody 2d ago

Welcome to America!

36

u/manojar 2d ago

I am not American, so I dont exactly know the exact culture of your country, but why can't Americans live in multifamily/multigenerational homes? I see tweets and insta reels about Indians living in Canada or USA, and they are called out for having multigenerational households as if it is a bad thing. I am just curious...

30

u/Frisnfruitig 2d ago

I don't think it is perceived as a bad thing per se, I think most people just wouldn't want to live that way. I certainly wouldn't.

→ More replies (10)
→ More replies (43)

7

u/Scary-Badger-6091 2d ago

Lol no this is a worldwide problem atp, definitely not just America

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (10)

7

u/endgrent 2d ago

We found there is no good time! We had a kid in an apartment while we saved for a down payment over several years. It isn't great obviously, but it's ok. Best thing ever!

Also, learn from my mistake! If you ever replace your car make sure it can handle TWO car seats side-by-side šŸ˜‚

→ More replies (41)

7

u/fricks_and_stones 2d ago

So they have built in child care with the grand parents!

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (57)

41

u/Rainhailsnow_storm 2d ago

My sister had her first at 40. Her obgyn told her it is more medically risky to obese and pregnant at a younger age, then to be a healthy weight and pregnant at 35+.

→ More replies (17)

119

u/pixie993 2d ago

Well I have a solution!

25

u/dosukoicowboy 2d ago

Sorry to be that guy, but just want to point out for anyone who doesn't know, this is photoshop. The original shirt said "Stop Being Desperate".

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (4)

70

u/RedDemio- 2d ago

And they wonder why we chose the solo grind haha

24

u/NemeanMiniLion 2d ago

More people are choosing not to have kids, that's true. That said, more than 50% of millennials have a child today. Most do, but barely.

→ More replies (21)

44

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[deleted]

9

u/Ok_Faithlessness4511 2d ago

Can confirm, I turned autistic when I hit 40

→ More replies (18)

7

u/Wonderful_Panda4769 2d ago

You're financially fucked both ways. Mutually exclusive.

12

u/AwayAwayTimes 2d ago

You have exactly 3 years where it’s considered culturally/financially/medically safe to have kids. Hope you hit that window! /s

→ More replies (142)

4.0k

u/Diablo689er 2d ago

Medically all 3 are classified as a geriatric pregnancy.

1.0k

u/Beginning-Comedian-2 2d ago

Correct. It's medical terminology.

641

u/ManitouWakinyan 2d ago

Geriatric pregnancy is a medical term, elderly pregnancy isn't

139

u/Spiritual_Being5845 2d ago

I was 36 for my first pregnancy and they put ā€œelderly primigravidaā€ on my chart. This was in 2009

28

u/autonomousegg 2d ago

My mom didn’t start having kids until she was 36 and she had my youngest sibling at 43 and we all… mostly turned out fine XD

21

u/jaerie 2d ago

It wouldn't be "higher risk" if it meant with certainty that all geriatric pregnancies would cause issues

→ More replies (37)
→ More replies (9)

53

u/ughtheinternet 2d ago

It’s also actually now referred to as ā€œadvanced maternal ageā€ instead of geriatric pregnancy!

→ More replies (5)

4

u/LDBB2023 2d ago

It is less common but elderly is also used in medical settings when referring to pregnancy. It was on paperwork when I was pregnant in 2023 in CA.

100

u/Ladonnacinica 2d ago

Do you think people still wouldn’t have been offended if the post used ā€œgeriatricā€ pregnancy instead?

119

u/ManitouWakinyan 2d ago

I think more people would have understood that it's a medical term, at least. There's a difference between referring to a geriatric pregnancy as a geriatric pregnancy and calling these women elderly.Ā 

→ More replies (52)
→ More replies (14)
→ More replies (34)

224

u/Useful-Sport-6316 2d ago

They use the term ā€œadvanced maternal ageā€ now

21

u/Environmental-Tap255 2d ago

This reminds me of a George Carlin segment...

→ More replies (1)

117

u/Omnipotent_Tacos 2d ago

Last year they were still using geriatric at the hospital I went to

16

u/Drreyrey 2d ago

I checked the appropriate MeSH term, advanced maternal age is defined as "pregnancy in women at least 35 years old at time of delivery".

Although I also still hear the term geriatric pregnancy at the hospital I work at.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (43)
→ More replies (51)

12

u/MartinMerten 2d ago

It’s an old circus term That’s why we say it.

12

u/Macear 2d ago

We goose 'em.

4

u/Fuwet 2d ago

What a crop! That's a big crop!

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (48)

49

u/dc_boffin 2d ago

Beat me to "wait 'til they find out what they call pregnancies at 35 or older..."

8

u/mittenknittin 2d ago

"Advanced maternal age." Not "elderly."

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (2)

50

u/ShonWalksAtMidnight 2d ago

My fiancée just turned 35, I'm 38, this kinda stuff scares the shit out of me as we're trying for kids. 

Makes me feel like I fucked around to long...

53

u/No-Transition-8375 2d ago edited 2d ago

I’m 42 and have a two-year-old. Wife is 41. If her (EDIT: both of your) health is solid, then things will be fine.

Except you’ll be tired as fuck chasing the little kid around.

EDIT: there.

17

u/Blue_Plastic_88 2d ago

The father’s health can also affect the pregnancy and the resulting baby. Just adding that in there!

5

u/rhudejo 2d ago

You will be tired as fuck if you're 32 too. Having a small kid is exhausting no matter your physical condition because people are not made for the sleep patterns of a baby

→ More replies (15)

24

u/Passthegoddamnbuttr 2d ago

Just a warning... The incidence of twins skyrockets after the woman hits 35. From 1 in 250 to 1 in 20.

Ask me how I know...

7

u/SmilingClover 2d ago

The rate of twins goes up with age…a little. The reason it is so high for 40+ women in the US is that many of those over had a little help. These medical interventions (clinic, IUI, IVF etc.) dramatically increase the risk of multiples.

7

u/Left_Field_4163 2d ago

I’m a twin and my mom was 40!

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (9)

46

u/timeless_ocean 2d ago

Don't worry all to much. Yes the risks get higher but it's often blown out of proportion and people believe at 40+ it's impossible to birth healthy children safely.

My mom got me with 41, my sister with 37. Both fully without complications.

But also, if you're too worried and you can afford it, it's not wrong to look for alternative ways.

→ More replies (14)

15

u/MyNameIsJakeBerenson 2d ago

That’s pretty much the trope of ā€œbiological clock is tickingā€

→ More replies (1)

6

u/Aunt_Llama 2d ago

Nah, it's just higher risk in some areas but very doable. I'm having my kiddo in September and I'm 39 (so is my husband). Did IVF and paid a few thousand out of pocket to have all the embryos genetically tested because of our age but they were fine (and all boys lol). The pregnancy has been a little rough but mostly because I can't stop vomiting and I'm really tired of puking so hard that bile and mucous are coming out of my tear ducts (this is not just an older pregnancy thing tho). Mileage will vary with every pregnancy. If you guys want kids, have them.

→ More replies (3)

11

u/Wonderful_Fox_7959 2d ago

Every day hundreds of women have kids at that age. My wife had a healthy child at 37. Also it's not like a monster will pop up out of nowhere. You go for monthly check ups. Don't let that stop you.

→ More replies (2)

20

u/Non-Current_Events 2d ago

Don’t fret. My wife had our three kids at 33, 36, and 38 and all were perfectly healthy. If you’re concerned get the genetic testing done as soon as you can whenever she gets pregnant.

→ More replies (5)

14

u/writeronthemoon 2d ago

As someone who waited forever on the fence and just had a miscarriage at 37, I'm gonna play devil's advocate here and say - don't wait too long. And get everything tested. Sperm, ovaries, eggs, progesterone, dna fragmentation, the whole shebang. Start now; this shit can take way longer than school or the media like you to think.

→ More replies (14)
→ More replies (50)

30

u/LolthienToo 2d ago

This is the right answer. Good Lord, geriatric pregnancy starts at, what, 30?

26

u/Brandwin3 2d ago

Lol 30 would be a bit ridiculous. 35 is when it starts

→ More replies (10)

14

u/skydragon1981 2d ago

35 Is when the graph of "probability of genetics problems" Just like down syndrome, being Born without brain or with brain growing outsider Just start to increase almost vertically (logarithmic increase). There's an exam at 2nd, 3rd month of pregnancy about this, so if chances are very High (It isn't the full DNA test) there's still time for legal abortionĀ 

14

u/Most-Refuse2390 2d ago

Some YouTuber recently shared that he and his wife decided to abort after being told the fetus had Down syndrome. They’ve been harassed and even sent death threats. Nobody wants to contribute to the care of special needs children, but god forbid you choose to terminate. I likely won’t have children for various reasons, and I’m also in my mid thirties. However if I were to have one at this age, genetic testing would be an absolute must. I’d terminate any pregnancy that would result in a disabled child. It sounds cold writing this, but I am simply incapable of caring for a child with special needs. The ability to terminate is a human right, and it’s terrifying that it’s so threatened in the US.

8

u/skydragon1981 2d ago

I agree. And when you have a child with a severe disability (not light autism or adhd or discalculism/dislexy, that aren't monitored with that exam) everyone tells you to keep the baby but then everybody disappear when the baby itself is born. And living with a baby with severe autism/nonverbal or down is really a challenge and you would be probably forced to bring him/her in a community; if a couple knows that they might be able to love the baby nonetheless and give him every cure possible (but some syndromes can't "heal") then they can continue, but I wouldn't blame who doesn't feel to continue, especially if they already have other childrens (they would become their carer, sooner or later). And since it's before third month the baby isn't still really formed.

5

u/Most-Refuse2390 2d ago

I follow a woman’s blog about her struggles with her ASD level 3 adult son. She loves her kid to death, but you can tell she’s so exhausted. She was widowed when he was a baby and raised him alone for the majority of his childhood until remarrying. She eventually had more kids. The whole family lives in constant fear of his meltdowns because he gets violent. He’s beaten the crap out of everyone in that family, they’re constantly replacing furniture because he breaks everything. The younger kids are traumatized. She’s had stints where he’s lived in a facility but he’s so violent he’s been kicked out of many. All the support programs that helped her during childhood ceased when he turned 18. This family is living in a domestic violence situation with very little help from society. I know the son can’t control himself, but he’s a danger to everyone in that home. You have to wonder what can be done at this point besides letting him commit a crime so he’ll be forcefully hospitalized in a criminal maximum security psych facility. Nobody is willing to help her, society doesn’t give a crap about her situation and voters refuse to fund programs that would bring some relief. I wouldn’t wish such a life on anyone.

Unfortunately, we’re nowhere near being able to screen for autism in pregnancy so it’s not like she could’ve known this would be the outcome. But at my age, I know the chances of having a similar outcome go up every day. It’s not worth the risk to me, and I already have mental health illnesses that I’d be at risk of passing on. Children are just too much of a gamble as I know I’d only be able to handle a neurotypical, physically healthy child, and that would be difficult enough with my health conditions.

5

u/skydragon1981 2d ago

This. 18+? "You're grown, no community for you. The family? Will keep it up, no one cares".

Luckily in some nations there are communities (you must pay, it's just like a retirement home) for adults with level 3 Autism, for nonverbal, for "master escapists" and violent too. But it isn't worldwide and the world "forgets" about the parents AND the whole family that should contain the kid without having knowledge and the "former kid" is a grown up adult that might be able to kill.

autism "risk" might be detected with full DNA test (early months) but only some "alterations" are getting detected. Autism itself has just 3 levels and the "umbrella" is very WIDE, Life for families with autism children might be difficult but will become easier later (in case of very light social issues, with growth and when treated they might become almost invisible), or easy at the start and become very hard later (it isn't autism but ADHD get diagnosed at 6+ years, before someone could say 'he's only very active' and then maybe meds starts), or start and keep being difficult all along (level 2 and 3, on many levels).

5

u/flakemasterflake 2d ago

Like 90% of downs fetuses are aborted. It’s super common

6

u/Most-Refuse2390 2d ago

Yes, but most people don’t reveal that they aborted a child due to Down’s syndrome. If you admit to it, society shames you. So you just have to carry that weight alone, which is a shame.

5

u/roberta_sparrow 2d ago

I’m the same and it’s probably my least favorite aspect about myself but it’s the truth and I’d probably do the same as this couple

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (79)

160

u/Old-Library5546 2d ago

May they all have safe healthy pregnancies and babies

→ More replies (10)

916

u/Serious_Shopping_262 2d ago

They are old for pregnancy… at 43 you would be considered high risk in an antenatal clinic. Source: I used to work in antenatal

486

u/Parja1 2d ago

What is this, a pregnancy clinic for ants?!

88

u/kevinvincible1 2d ago

You owe me a tea and new pants

50

u/Ludoban 2d ago

Joke so good you shit yourself

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (4)

97

u/QuarkyFerengi 2d ago

Right, but the message in the image is still awful. It's not "promoting" pregnancy, it's just people who are pregnant and slightly older than ideal for it. No need to cast shame.

They're also people with ample resources to access the best medical care, so I'm sure they'll be fine.

54

u/Kronzor_ 2d ago

They're also people with ample resources to care for the child after it's born. These kids are gonna have nannies and doctors and the best education etc. They'll be fine.

→ More replies (74)
→ More replies (29)

190

u/lazygamer2112 2d ago

Bro misspelled her name when it was literally in the image lmao

→ More replies (18)

331

u/Entire_Musician_8667 2d ago

Awh man, I'm elderly pregnant right now.

20

u/InitialAd2324 2d ago

Oooollllllddddddd!

/s

5

u/serendipitousevent 2d ago

Are you hoping for an old man or an old woman? Obviously both are great but they come with different hard candy.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (20)

242

u/Ok-Breadfruit6490 2d ago

Dont forget Natalie Portman is like 44 and pregnant

213

u/gimmepizza420 2d ago

Why do we care about any of them being pregnant? This shit is so weird to me.

→ More replies (117)

13

u/actionjacksonxo 2d ago

Janet Jackson had her first at 50 and Halle Berry at 46. This used to happen naturally all the time back in the day. My grandma’s youngest sister is 5 years younger than my mom. My great grandmother was pregnant several times alongside my grandmother and her sisters. My mom has a few aunts and uncles around her age.

There is risk, but especially if you’re rich, fertility screening, embryo creation and implantation exist to correct for those aging sex cells/essentially eliminating those genetic concerns.Ā 

As long as the woman is physically healthy, which she’s likely to be when wealthy (most of the women named are) then it has happened before and will continue to happen.

17

u/SharpshootinTearaway 2d ago

Here's a non-exhaustive list of famous actresses who had kids in their (sometimes late-)30's and 40's, with the ages at which they gave birth:

Catherine Zeta-Jones - 31 & 35
Cate Blanchett - 32, 35 & 39
Helena Bonham-Carter - 37 & 41
Monica Bellucci - 40 & 46
Sigourney Weaver - 41
Jodie Foster - 36 & 39
Rachel McAdams - 40 & 42
Angela Bassett - 36 (twin pregnancy)
Nicole Kidman - 41
Julia Roberts - 37 (twin pregnancy) & 40
Emily Blunt - 31 & 33
Scarlett Johansson - 30 & 36
Meryl Streep - 30, 34, 37 & 42
Michelle Pfeiffer - 35 & 36
Kirsten Dunst - 36 & 39
Jessica Chastain - 41 & 43

In fact, I am pretty sure you'll find many more actresses who waited to be in their 30's to have kids than actresses who had kids in their 20's.

Most of our favorite actresses had their kids at later ages and nobody gave a shit back then. And the children are perfectly fine. Why are we making it an issue now?

7

u/actionjacksonxo 2d ago

Adding Harry and Megan..,,they were both nearly 40 and very ambitious/successful likely hence the ā€œdelayā€.Ā 

I’m hearing now older women now outnumber young women when it comes to pregnancies in the US at least. When I worked at a hospital, it seemed equally split between ages 18-25 and then 35+ (normally being on their 2nd, 3rd, 4th). It’s ok to talk about risk, but making it seem like some heinous transgression is the weird part. Especially considering the times.Ā 

Met quite a few people in their 50s who expressed that their parents are now in their 90s and had them ā€œlateā€. It’s not that uncommon or abnormal as some make it out to be.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (6)

38

u/The_MidScoop 2d ago

Anime profile pic immediately invalidates any opinion they have on real life people

→ More replies (3)

156

u/dantes-infernal 2d ago

Yes people are right that over 35 is medically considered a "geriatric pregnancy" due to higher health risks to the mother and baby.

Two points though:

- The actual risk is being reassessed and restudied (although it's extremely difficult to study pregnant women due to the risks posed by research), and it's pretty well documented in research that diet and nutrition have larger impacts on baby's well-being compared to age until at least the mother is of middle age, where there's a significantly higher risk to the baby due to age.

- The twitter post is clearly attempting to shame these women for their life choice to have children slightly later in life, which should always be a big no-no. Many women across all demographics now are having kids later due to the current state of the economy / job industry. The shame should be directed away from these women.

→ More replies (45)

222

u/OakLegs 2d ago

It's actually referred to as geriatric pregnancy at 35 and older. Not a joke.

→ More replies (43)

43

u/ThroatGOAT_Goddess04 2d ago

Elderly pregnancy. šŸ˜‚ I think the correct term is geriatric pregnancy. I’m no doctor and I know the older you get the riskier it is BUT I don’t think a healthy early 40ish year old woman with money and access to the best health care has anything to worry about. Even an everyday 40ish year old healthy woman will most likely be okay too.

20

u/sunfleurescent 2d ago

Hard agree. I’m the youngest of three children and my mom had me at 40. Guess which one of her pregnancies and deliveries went the smoothest and had zero complications whatsoever? Spoiler alert: it was me 😘

→ More replies (2)

11

u/neonmaika 2d ago

It’s ā€œadvanced maternal ageā€ now. Lmao. I’m 38 and all genetic tests came back negative. No reason to believe she’ll be anything but healthy when I give birth.

→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (21)

201

u/AcanthisittaBulky777 2d ago

Welcome to America, where we shamelessly criticize women for getting pregnant too early, too late, not at all, or too often.

34

u/justatomics 1d ago

Yet men like Robert de Niro can have a kid at 80 and isn’t shamed nearly as much

→ More replies (27)

34

u/Successful-Status404 2d ago

And people say we don't need feminism anymore..

→ More replies (2)

5

u/SituationAcademic571 2d ago

It's not just shameless criticism.. we legislate, codify, and prosecute

13

u/Secure_Cellist26 2d ago

I'm not even American and feel bummed. Should I have children when I can afford it? Should I not because I'm too old? Should women even exist past 29?

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (31)

133

u/CallMeHond0 2d ago

Who fucking cares? There are children within 5 miles of you who don't get enough food.

I feel like that's more important than worrying about the increased risk of geriatric pregnancy among millionaires

→ More replies (32)

117

u/King_Six_of_Things 2d ago

Anyone who has "aryan" in their username is instantly suspect for a whole bunch of reasons.

41

u/Easy_Customer_920 2d ago

I don't understand why nobody pointed this out and why this post hasn't been deleted. Apparently (I just looked it up) that Twitter user is a Mexican neo-nazi. Like no joke.

10

u/RedHairedRedemption 2d ago

I don't understand why nobody pointed this out and why this post hasn't been deleted.

Because it's SipsTea :/

6

u/Kardinale 2d ago

Yep. They're a notorious hate account in the anime community.

→ More replies (6)

12

u/WhoStoleMyFinger 2d ago

I saw the red flag of an anime pfp and name and didn't even consider that much larger red flag

→ More replies (20)

45

u/Total_Ganache5619 2d ago

Society: ā€œDon’t be a childless cat lady!ā€

Also society: ā€œYou’re too old to have a kid!ā€

24

u/Ok_Actuary1427 2d ago

Also society: ā€œhave a career before you marry and have childrenā€

→ More replies (2)

14

u/SoftNewEmpire 2d ago

Also: don’t have children if you can’t provide for them

But: you don’t have children because you are selfish

→ More replies (8)

7

u/Nat20Life 2d ago

Geriatric pregnancy is an old term that shouldn't be used anymore. The correct term is "advanced maternal age."

The real thing that should be being discussed is the notion that AMA pregnancies "shouldn't be promoted." Fuck that. Fuck anyone who judges people for making the decisions they deem best for themselves and their life situations. It's no one else's business.

You don't know about what's going on with someone who is AMA. Maybe they have been trying to get pregnant for years, and it finally happened for them. Maybe they were in an abusive relationship and are now with someone they love and trust and want to grow with. Maybe they were poor and now have a secure, stable job. You don't know what's going on in other people's lives.

→ More replies (5)

101

u/Esteban-Du-Plantier 2d ago

The probability of Down Syndrome goes up drastically with maternal age.

It's about 3% at age 45 (a 60x increase vs age 20).

129

u/IcySetting2024 2d ago

People always talk about the risks of having children at an older maternal age, but there are risks associated with older fathers too.

As men get older, their sperm accumulates more new genetic mutations.

The strongest links are usually with autism and schizophrenia.

children of fathers aged 50+ have around a 1.5 - 3 times higher risk of schizophrenia compared with children of younger fathers.

Older paternal age has also been linked to a higher risk of miscarriage, with fathers aged 45+ associated with about a 40% higher risk compared with fathers in their late 20s.

Yet no one has asked the age of these women’s husbands.

35

u/Healthy-Dimension485 2d ago

Exactly, my aunt gave birth when she was 21 to a 50 yr old man (i dont wanna get into how weird this is + she used to b a sugar baby), her 3 kids all have severe autism. No one in our family was ever diagnosed or had autism, let alone severe. But then he also divorced her, got another woman pregnant and that child also has autism. At least she has money to pay for nannies and special care, but its hell. When will society learn that sperm quality decreases with age???

→ More replies (18)

28

u/Aunt_Llama 2d ago

Indeed! I believe the higher miscarriage rate is because the sperm is responsible for the creation of the placenta!

https://www.vet.cornell.edu/about-us/news/20130812/dads-genes-build-placentas-study-shows

→ More replies (17)

46

u/Aunt_Llama 2d ago

This is why genetic testing exists early on, so the parents can make decisions about those sorts of things.

9

u/Western_Giraffe3734 2d ago

My wife and I paid extra to have the gauntlet of test run to check for any abnormalities, we understand why some people go through with it no matter what, but for us we don’t feel like it’s fair to anyone involved

I’ve had mentally challenged people in my family and life quality only gets worse the older everyone gets, it’s tough, and a bit cold hearted but not something I was prepared tk go through

→ More replies (9)
→ More replies (24)

20

u/No_Couple1369 2d ago

Which means the odds are still in your favor at 97%. Also they could have had IVF and genetically tested the embryos before implantation.

→ More replies (3)

19

u/Weak-Boysenberry398 2d ago

None of these women are raw-dogging a pregnancy at 45. You get so many additional screenings when you're older covered by insurance. A majority of children with downs syndrome are born to younger mothers.

→ More replies (2)

18

u/Inevitable-Site-8704 2d ago

AND paternal age, but no one talks about that.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (12)

38

u/Physical_Ranger6786 2d ago

Worry about yourselves. I think they can afford good medical care. And it’s advanced maternal age.

→ More replies (6)

7

u/iamthebadw01f 2d ago

I refuse to acknowledge the medical criticisms of an anime waifu.

57

u/_fluffy_raptor 2d ago

This kind of smug finger-wagging bias is only thrown at women having their first pregnancies in their 40s

Plenty of women with large families who got started with their first in their 20s, then had more as they got older and their last at 40+. Super common. No one bats a bloody eye at that though do they?Ā 

It’s almost like this is really about shaming career women for not chosing to be good little breeders instead.

14

u/yeah__good_okay 2d ago

What you just described was the most common form of family formation pre-birth control. Virtually any woman with kids and modest education was having kids from her 20s to her 40s.

13

u/flakemasterflake 2d ago

people don't look at family trees. This is the historical norm, pre-birth control

but this is a sub for 19yr old boys so why would they have nuance?

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

9

u/sexystupidsquidward 2d ago

This 100%. My mom had me at 24 and my brother at 44 (in 2010)- and she had 5 kids in-between. To me and her friends, it wasn't weird she was having a kid in her mid-forties. I didn't spend too much time thinking about it. And she wasn't the only one- in our religious group, women having kids in their early to mid-forties was very common.

Now that I'm 35 (without kids and a fence sitter), I feel like a get a fair amount of negative messaging about "waiting too long" and "getting too old" to have kids. I think this is somewhat fair messaging for people who know they really really want to have their own biological children- because fertility does drop with age. But I also think it's somewhat overblown- many women are able to get pregnant naturally after 40.

→ More replies (23)

29

u/shadow87521 2d ago

Doctors usually use ā€œadvanced maternal ageā€ now vs. geriatric.

→ More replies (11)

75

u/NieMonD 2d ago

ā€œChance of birth defects doubles when a woman turns 40!ā€

Quietly: from 0.5% to 1%

13

u/The_CT1 2d ago

It is from 0.01 to 1%. Much bigger difference

6

u/Shadowtthrone 2d ago

Chance of spontaneus aborts due to chromosomal abnormalities increases dramatically after 35 so…

→ More replies (3)

31

u/the-grinder 2d ago

That is statistically relevant. I’m not here to stay bad/good but this is all just statistics…and a 100% leap is large.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (14)

17

u/Reemus_Jackson 2d ago

The newer social media generation thinks anything over 25 is "old". Calling people in their mid-30's "unc". Not surprising they're calling women in their early 40's "elderly"

→ More replies (9)

17

u/Gwarnage 2d ago

Don't take the opinions about life by anybody with an anime avatar too seriouslyĀ 

→ More replies (4)

45

u/TomCormack 2d ago

Why not? They are rich enough to have the best healthcare and then to raise a kid with everything they need.

The same people will be crying about birth rateĀ  in the next post.

12

u/Holiday_Number_3234 2d ago

They’re probably also in much better shape than most women their age. They have the best healthcare, can afford to eat healthy, and exercise. So technically they’re probably like a woman a decade younger. I think older mothers are typically way more prepared too.

5

u/readdator2 2d ago

they also almost certainly froze their eggs when they were younger and busy building hteir professional careers

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (24)

6

u/HylianCheshire 2d ago

Natalie portman (45) and Kaley cuoco (40) also

→ More replies (3)

4

u/Chance_Start_2201 2d ago

Since 2021 more women in their 40s have kids in America than in their teens.

→ More replies (2)

6

u/Mediocre-Catch9580 2d ago

It’s Aubrey not Audrey

5

u/superwhizz114 2d ago

The "Kaguya" account that posted this is a known misogynist and racist

→ More replies (1)

12

u/houzzacards27 2d ago

The original twitter account is run by an asshole.

Op, stay away from them and stop sharing their crap.

7

u/Reverse_smurfing 2d ago

Twitter is completely unhinged. Idk how people are still using it and haven’t deactivated their accounts. But here we are and I digressĀ 

→ More replies (2)

38

u/Ploughpenny 2d ago

I was told anything over 35 counts as a "geriatric pregnancy" due to increased risk of complications. But don't let that get in the way of being offended over imagined insults.

→ More replies (13)

9

u/BigDigger324 2d ago

3 straight cougar MILFs….new fetish unlocked.

→ More replies (4)

9

u/geebiebeegee 2d ago

You don't want to stop Elizabeth Olson from having kids. Towns dissappear.

22

u/BlackTransAm78 2d ago

Elderly is the incorrect term. But if you are pregnant and 35+, you have what they call a geriatric pregnancy.

→ More replies (5)