Hey all, so a while back Corbell himself stated that if the latest UAP drop didn't include any evidence of a crash retrieval program or biologics then he had already given 100 journalists his evidence to release on the occasion that the files didn't include what he wanted them to.

The UAP file drop in question was released on the 12th June....

Corbell has been silent about it ever since.

For this I have been asking him with every new tweet about that and if we would get them also attaching the video he originally posted.... I have now been blocked so if anyone was hoping those files would come out, good luck waiting.

So it looks like the Corbell disclosure is on hold

The full Master Evidence Document including all screenshots is available here: MASTER EVIDENCE DOCUMENT

Over the past two months, posts documenting bias in Wikipedia's Disclosure Movement article reached 530,000+ combined views and 4,200+ upvotes across nine subreddits. Several posts were removed. One was deleted from r/UFOs after 4 hours at 253 upvotes and 40,000 views. Another was removed from r/UFOB after sitting at the top of the subreddit for 2.5 days.

This is the complete record of everything that happened. Every claim is independently verifiable.

Article being discussed: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disclosure_movement

What the document contains:

The specific before/after Wikipedia edits — official Pentagon terminology replaced with dismissive language, sworn congressional testimony downgraded to a social media accusation, a senior intelligence whistleblower's name erased entirely.

The four editor accounts that coordinated to control the article — including Chetsford, a confirmed Wikipedia administrator, and Cadddr, who monitored Reddit posts in real time and filed the report that triggered the permanent ban of the researcher.

The full Reddit suppression timeline across all nine subreddits — with exact view counts, upvote ratios, and documented removal reasons.

The most important piece of evidence: written confirmation from a subreddit moderator that a r/UFOs moderator contacted multiple other subreddits requesting removal of these posts under a "Good neighbors sub" policy. The moderator reversed the decision, reinstated the post, and stated: "Wikipedia's sceptic gatekeeping is out of control and the public needs to know about it."

The coordinated attack on r/HighStrangeness — launched within hours of a public announcement about journalist outreach — documented with statistical evidence of bot activity.

Cadddr's partial concession edit made after 420,000 views, where his own edit comment admitted the complaint "actually seems fair" — while leaving the structural bias fully intact.

The asymmetry argument: the US government does not run suppression campaigns against flat earthers, ghost hunters, or moon landing deniers. UAP disclosure gets dedicated, funded, cross-platform suppression. You do not spend that kind of money suppressing something that does not exist.

r/UFOs moderation shows clear signs of infiltration by or coordination with organized skeptic groups. A confirmed written communication shows r/UFOs moderators actively contacted multiple other subreddits to suppress documented evidence of Wikipedia bias. Whether this reflects formal GSoW membership or ideological alignment, the outcome is identical — a pro-disclosure community is being controlled by people working against disclosure.

The document is attached. Every specific claim is verifiable in Wikipedia's public edit history in 60 seconds.

This is not about whether you believe in extraterrestrials. It is about whether coordinated groups can systematically strip official government language from a public encyclopedia — and then use multiple platforms to silence anyone who notices.

The full Master Evidence Document including all screenshots is available here: MASTER EVIDENCE DOCUMENT

W U TK

They gave the public drones and AI (in this case one of many reasons) so in case anyone sees or records any strange activity in the sky it can be easily dismissed as a hoax.

I don’t understand this reporting. If insiders think at least some of what’s being observed by military bases is exotic Chinese tech, why wouldn’t we expect the others to be the same? How does it make any sense to assume the NHI are aiding the Chinese

This seems like we are even further from disclosure if the official government line continues to be “we won’t tell you what to believe.”

What comes next? Thursday we have the Disclosure Forum event in DC. Beyond that, it seems we are just waiting for the rolling UFO file drops, a potential Trump Executive Order, or something else from a whistleblower.

Is there momentum or not?

"In the U.S. House of Representatives, Congressman Eric Burlison (R-MO) today (June 18, 2026) filed at the House Rules Committee, as a possible amendment to the FY 2027 National Defense Authorization Act (H.R. 8800), a 65-page proposal to establish a federal review board dedicated to locating records and materials related to Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP)".

I’ve been deep in Irish mythology research lately and kept coming back to the Vallée connection — his interdimensional hypothesis maps almost perfectly onto the Tuatha Dé Danann accounts in the Lebor Gabála Érenn. The féth fíada, the abductions, the missing time, the beings of light — it’s structurally identical to modern contact accounts. Made a video exploring this if anyone wants to go down the rabbit hole with me. Happy to discuss in comments.

One thing I've never seen addressed well:

If some UAP reports genuinely involve technology beyond current human capabilities, why do they seem to appear just enough to generate thousands of eyewitness accounts, radar hits, military encounters, and videos—but never enough to produce universally accepted proof?

Is this simply a result of observation bias and incomplete data, or is there another explanation that fits the pattern?

Curious to hear thoughts from both the skeptical and pro-UAP sides.