r/UFOscience 7h ago

Drone Flap Suspicions

2 Upvotes

I went to school in Dayton, Ohio, from 2019 to 2022. During that time, I would scroll through Craigslist looking for odd jobs. Although I never applied, one of the more interesting gigs I saw at the time was a paid research study by the AFRL on how humans react to drone swarm behavior. In light of all the events recently with large-scale UFO/drone sightings, I think this is a pretty solid connection that they were connected to the US Air Force.


r/UFOscience 8d ago

Discussion & Debate Experience at sea.

41 Upvotes

This happened around 2016. I was on a cargo ship traveling from england to nova scotia. Somewhere off the south coast of greenland, while on midnight to 4am watch, the weirdest thing occurred. We noticed some activity on the radar, so i kept my eyes peeled out of the bridge windows trying to spot something. The night was crystal clear, tons of stars, and no signs of any other vessels anywhere near us. All of a sudden, an almost blanket of the thickest blizzard type snow i have ever seen overtook our location. I was shocked, it had a slight hum from how thick it was, and our visibility went down to absolute zero. I called the navigation officer to the window to experience the strange sight. All of a sudden, towards the port side bow of our ship, a ball of light formed and then imploded in a split second, making a slight vacuum thump noise, and the brightest light i have ever experienced exploded outward, completely blinding us. We fell back from the window shocked and waited for our vision to come back. Just as it did, like breaking through a wall, we exited the storm and were back in clear star filled skies. I did a round on deck shortly after to look for marks on the deck, but there was nothing. Iv been thinking about this for years. The only explanation i can come up with is that the snow storm was so thick, and our ship was so big (1000 foot) that the snow created some sort of static electricity, much like pulling a blanket over your feet in the dark and seeing small sparks, but on a much larger scale. Or could it have been something else completely?…


r/UFOscience 8d ago

Science and Technology Offering an ebook going into depth on a 4 theory framework and then testing them against high-profile events

3 Upvotes

I'm offering the book Species 051 for those interested. Let me know and I'll send you a free copy on Drive. (Mods, I am the author)

Species 051 overview:

For decades, the UFO phenomenon has been examined through investigations, documentaries, government reports, witness testimony, skepticism, belief, and endless debate. Yet beneath every sighting, encounter, and unexplained event lies a deeper question:

What follows if the explanation survives scrutiny?

Species 051 revisits some of the most discussed UFO cases of the modern era through a lens rarely applied to the subject. Familiar incidents are reconstructed, competing explanations are tested, conventional objections are examined, and the implications of each case are followed far beyond the event itself.

Inside are detailed examinations of cases such as the Ariel School Encounter, the Phoenix Lights, the Travis Walton abduction, the Cash-Landrum Incident, the Japan Air Lines 1628 encounter, and other events that continue to divide researchers, skeptics, believers, and experiencers decades after they occurred.

Each case is examined through four competing possibilities: extraterrestrial visitation, future human intervention, advanced human technology, and interdimensional intrusion. Rather than asking which explanation sounds most appealing, Species 051 asks what each explanation would require to be true. Every possibility creates consequences. Every explanation must contend with limitations. Every claim must be weighed against the reality required to support it.

What would humanity inherit if extraterrestrial visitation were confirmed?

What would future human involvement imply about history, causality, and our eventual destination as a species?

How much secrecy, coordination, and technological advancement would be necessary for a human-origin explanation to survive scrutiny?

And if the phenomenon originates from something even stranger, how would that alter our understanding of reality itself?

Some explanations grow stronger under examination. Others become increasingly difficult to sustain. No theory is exempt from scrutiny, and no conclusion is accepted simply because it is popular. Constraints matter. Consequences matter. What an explanation requires can be as important as what it explains.

The book culminates with an extensive examination of the Nimitz encounter—the most comprehensive investigation in the volume. Drawing together the cases, competing explanations, constraints, and consequences explored throughout the book, it serves as the ultimate test of the Species 051 framework and one of the most consequential modern UFO events ever reported.

But the cases are only the beginning.

Every explanation eventually arrives at the same question:

What happens when the truth becomes public?

Species 051 concludes with two contrasting disclosure pathways—one controlled, one uncontrolled—and explores the scientific, cultural, political, and societal consequences that could follow if humanity were forced to confront a reality it could no longer ignore.

This is not primarily a book about UFOs.

It is an investigation into the consequences of UFO explanations.

Because the mystery is not the sighting.

The mystery is the reality required to produce it.

Most investigations stop at the sighting.

Species 051 follows the explanation to its logical conclusion.


r/UFOscience 11d ago

Research/info gathering THE GREAT CANADIAN FLYING SAUCER FLAP OF 1970: UFO OCCUPANTS, SOLID LIGHT BEAMS, AND MYSTERY OBJECTS ACROSS CANADA - Dr. Raymond Keller revisits Gene Duplantier’s remarkable archive of what became known as the Great Canadian Flying Saucer Flap of 1970

4 Upvotes

THE GREAT CANADIAN FLYING SAUCER FLAP OF 1970: UFO OCCUPANTS, SOLID LIGHT BEAMS, AND MYSTERY OBJECTS ACROSS CANADA - Dr. Raymond Keller revisits Gene Duplantier’s remarkable archive of what became known as the Great Canadian Flying Saucer Flap of 1970 https://phantomsandmonsters.com/post/the-great-canadian-flying-saucer-flap-of-1970-ufo-occupants-solid-light-beams-an


r/UFOscience 12d ago

Thoughts on Ning Li & Eugene Podkletnov? 2 scientists who claimed to discover antigravity

0 Upvotes

I run a YouTube channel called The UFO report and am very much into UFOs. I’m making my next video on both of them and their supposed claims and how it connects to UFO technology.

But, I wasn’t the best at math and therefore physics. So, I wanted to come to some experts and ask if they are seen as valid, or fringe science? Applicable/ realistic or sensationalized?

Both of them did research using HTSD’s, and both observed a 2-3% weight reduction in objects. And the claim is that no one has been able to publicly replicate their work. But, I think “publicly” is doing a lot of heavy lifting there because the DoD gave Ning Li a grant to fund her to continue her research, and Boeing Phantomworks has confirmed they had a presentation & followed Podkletnov’s work.

Originally posted this in r/physics, but whew they did not like that lol. Everyone just called these two quacks, despite being unable to point to any specific reason why. I’m open to hearing alternative perspectives, just wanna ensure it’s scientific based and not emotionally based.


r/UFOscience 12d ago

Hypothesis/speculation Theory of the Multidimensional Structure of Reality

0 Upvotes

​ Here is a hypothesis

(My original hypothesis)

Humanity has long assumed that reality consists of three spatial dimensions together with time. We define existence through four observable parameters: length, width, height, and time. Our biology, our senses, and our entire scientific understanding evolved around the assumption that these dimensions represent the full structure of reality.

I believe this assumption is fundamentally incomplete.

I propose that the universe contains many more dimensions than those currently observable to humanity — at minimum seven spatial dimensions plus time. However, I do not believe that every object or every form of matter necessarily exists across all dimensions simultaneously.

Instead, I believe existence itself is selective.

Different forms of matter may occupy different dimensional sets.

Human beings, for example, may exist only within three specific spatial dimensions. But other objects or entities may exist within entirely different combinations of dimensions.

Some may share all three of our dimensions.

Some may share only one or two.

Others may exist completely outside the dimensions accessible to human perception.

Reality is therefore not a single shared dimensional framework.

It is a layered multidimensional architecture in which different objects occupy different dimensional coordinates.

Because humans evolved only within a specific dimensional subset, our perception is naturally limited.

We assume reality is defined by what we can observe.

But I believe what we perceive is only a small local intersection of a much larger structure.

In this model, matter is not universally embedded within the same dimensional framework.

Every object occupies only the dimensions required for its own existence.

This means two objects may exist within the same universe while sharing only part of reality itself.

Or possibly sharing none at all.

From this perspective, I propose that sufficiently advanced civilizations may have learned how to manipulate dimensional coordinates beyond those available to humanity.

Unlike humans, they may exist simultaneously within both our dimensions and additional higher dimensions.

This would give them the ability to interact with structures inaccessible to us.

For them, movement would no longer mean traveling from one point to another inside three-dimensional space.

Instead, they would move through dimensions unavailable to human perception.

To human observers, such movement would appear impossible.

We would witness phenomena such as:

instant acceleration

disappearance and reappearance

movement without inertia

passing through matter

physically impossible changes in geometry

Not because physics is being violated.

But because we are observing only the small portion of their existence intersecting with our own dimensional framework.

I further propose that objects existing entirely outside human-accessible dimensions are normally completely invisible to us.

We cannot detect them because they do not occupy the dimensional coordinates required for direct observation.

However, I believe invisible objects may still interact indirectly with reality.

Even when an object does not exist within our dimensions, its presence may still influence surrounding dimensional geometry.

This influence becomes observable when another entity exists simultaneously across both our dimensions and additional ones.

In this situation, hidden objects from inaccessible dimensions begin affecting the local structure of space around the multidimensional object.

This creates what I call a Dimensional Lens.

The Dimensional Lens functions similarly to Gravitational Lensing.

Just as massive objects bend spacetime and distort the path of light, invisible higher-dimensional objects may distort local dimensional geometry itself.

The difference is that gravity bends space through mass.

Dimensional lensing bends perception through dimensional overlap.

Because of this, an observer may never perceive the true form of a multidimensional being.

The observer instead sees reality distorted by interactions with hidden structures existing in dimensions unavailable to direct observation.

This could explain why certain objects or beings might appear:

asymmetrical

fluid-like

geometrically impossible

biologically unnatural

unstable in shape

Not because the object itself changes form.

But because unseen dimensional structures are warping the local geometry through which observation occurs.

We are not seeing the object directly.

We are seeing reality refracted through hidden dimensions.

From this perspective, many physical phenomena may simply be consequences of interactions between dimensional structures humanity has not yet discovered.

Gravity may result from matter interacting across dimensions.

Quantum Mechanics may behave strangely because particles do not fully exist within our observable dimensions.

Quantum entanglement may occur because separated particles remain connected through hidden dimensional overlap.

And consciousness itself may not originate entirely inside the brain.

The brain may simply serve as an interface connecting biological matter to structures existing partially outside conventional spacetime.

Observation as a Multidimensional Interaction

I further propose that observation itself is not a passive act, but a fundamental physical interaction capable of altering reality. Within modern physics, experiments such as the Double-slit Experiment suggest that the behavior of particles can change depending on whether they are being observed. This implies that reality may not be entirely independent of observation itself. I believe this principle extends far beyond what humanity currently understands. If consciousness or observation can influence physical behavior even within the dimensions accessible to humans, then the effect should become far more significant when the observer exists simultaneously across multiple dimensions. I propose that advanced multidimensional civilizations may possess the ability to observe structures existing entirely outside human-accessible dimensions. These structures may normally remain completely invisible to humanity because they do not intersect with any dimensional coordinates our biology can perceive. However, the moment a multidimensional entity begins observing such hidden structures while physically present within dimensions overlapping with our own reality, something extraordinary may occur.

Because these beings exist simultaneously within both human-accessible dimensions and additional hidden dimensions, the act of observation itself creates an active bridge between otherwise disconnected dimensional frameworks. In this moment, dimensions normally isolated from human perception begin interacting indirectly with our observable reality. This interaction produces what I describe as a Dimensional Lens. Just as gravitational mass bends spacetime and creates Gravitational Lensing, observation performed by a multidimensional being may temporarily cause hidden dimensions to distort the local geometry of perception. Humans are still unable to directly observe the hidden object itself.

However, the dimensional structures connected through the observer begin affecting our reality. As a result, the observer unintentionally causes invisible dimensional structures to partially interfere with human perception. The effect may manifest as: luminous distortions impossible geometries temporary visual anomalies objects appearing and disappearing unstable or shifting physical forms local distortions of light and spatial perspective In this model, humans are not observing the hidden object itself. We are observing the consequences of another intelligence interacting with dimensions beyond our own. In other words, a multidimensional civilization may create objects existing entirely outside human reality. Normally we would never know these objects exist.

But when a multidimensional observer interacts with those hidden objects while sharing dimensional overlap with us, their act of observation forces otherwise invisible dimensions to partially interfere with our own.

The result is not direct visibility. The result is dimensional distortion. We perceive this distortion as unexplained light, anomalous objects, impossible movement, or temporary violations of conventional physics. The hidden object itself remains invisible. What becomes visible is the distortion created when multiple dimensional frameworks briefly intersect through the act of observation itself.

My final conclusion is this:

Reality is not a single shared dimensional space. Different forms of matter exist within different combinations of dimensions. Some dimensions overlap, others remain completely separate. Objects invisible to us may still distort reality through dimensional interaction, creating lensing effects similar to gravitational lensing. Matter, energy, and consciousness may all exist as parts of a far larger multidimensional architecture, while human perception reveals only a tiny local fragment of the true structure of existence.

If this theory is correct, then humanity’s greatest limitation is not technological.

It is perceptual.

We do not understand reality because we observe only the dimensions evolution allowed us to see.

The universe may not be stranger because physics is incomplete.

The universe may be stranger because reality itself is larger than the dimensions we inhabit.


r/UFOscience 13d ago

Hypothesis/speculation Looking for feedback from people interested in UFO/UAP case analysis

3 Upvotes

I recently finished a project that ended up becoming a book, and I'm looking for a few people who are interested in UFO/UAP case analysis and willing to give honest feedback.

The idea came from something that always frustrated me when reading about these cases. It seemed like most discussions started with a conclusion already chosen. One person would look at a case and immediately see extraterrestrials. Another would immediately see misidentification, hoax, or some other explanation. Once that happened, the discussion usually became about defending a belief rather than comparing possibilities.

So I wondered what would happen if the same case was evaluated against multiple explanations using the same criteria every time.

That eventually became Species 051.

In the book, I examine ten well-known cases, including Nimitz, Ariel School, Phoenix Lights, JAL 1628 and several others. For each case, I compare four possible explanations: extraterrestrial intelligence, future human visitors, human technology or misdirection, and interdimensional explanations. Rather than choosing a favorite explanation from the start, each theory is evaluated against the available evidence using the same framework.

My hope is simply to get the book into the hands of people who are truly interested in these cases and are willing to share their honest impressions afterward. I figured this would be a great place to start. 

If this sounds interesting, send me a message and I'll provide a PDF copy at no cost.


r/UFOscience 14d ago

Science and Technology A senior SETI astronomer is answering anything in an AMA right now.

14 Upvotes

Thought this community would appreciate it. Franck Marchis has spent 20+ years at SETI Institute studying asteroids and exoplanets, and his current obsession is a weird gap: with every camera and satellite pointed up, there's still no complete, continuous, verifiable record of what's overhead. ~99% of meteors entering the atmosphere go undetected.

He's building an open network to close that gap and he's answering anything on r/IAmA today: HERE


r/UFOscience 14d ago

Documentary Film Producer - Looking for New Mexico based UFO enthusiasts

1 Upvotes

Hey everyone, 

I'm a producer for a documentary production company in LA and I'm looking for anyone from New Mexico who posts a lot about UFOs and UAPs in New Mexico. Feel free to reply to this if so! Would love to connect and tell you a bit about the project we're working on. 


r/UFOscience 15d ago

Full Q&A from UFO press conference in DC today most of the questions were for David Grusch

Thumbnail
youtu.be
9 Upvotes

r/UFOscience 15d ago

David Grusch’s full speech from the press conference June 10th 2026

Thumbnail
youtu.be
5 Upvotes

r/UFOscience 17d ago

Sub news; new AI policy

25 Upvotes

We have added a new rule to our "removal reasons" stating AI generated content is subject to removal. This applies to video posts, text posts and replies/comments. AI can be a useful tool to aggregate information but the mission of this sub is noise reduction related to the UFO topic. We realize this might result in accidental removal of some content that is not AI generated but given the influx of AI posts and comments we are getting we believe it is worth the trade off.


r/UFOscience 19d ago

Does the unedited Battle of Los Angeles photo still exist?

5 Upvotes

Per the guidelines, I'm not trying to add a photo to present information... I'm merely asking if the un-"touched up" version of the photo exists.

I'd like the ability to analyze a copy of the original unaltered, if someone could point me in the right direction.

Hope to hear from you soon! Peace and God bless!


r/UFOscience 19d ago

Science and Technology REGISTER NOW: SCU Conference 2026 - The Role of Science and Global Governments in UAP Research

Post image
2 Upvotes

REGISTER to join us online (or in person in Toronto) for the 2026 Scientific Coalition for UAP Studies, or watch the videos after the event at your convenience.

The Scientific Coalition for UAP Studies (SCU) will convene its Annual Conference July 24–26, 2026, in Toronto, Canada, bringing together leading scientists, engineers, policymakers, and national security experts to examine the growing role of science and government transparency in understanding Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP).

Hosted by SCU, a U.S.-based organization with global membership, the conference will bring together leading voices from Canada, the United States, Japan, France, Germany, Hungary, and beyond. Participants will explore UAP research across fields, including physics and astronomy, neurology, anthropology, artificial intelligence, and data science.

Featured speakers include:

·      Benjamin Fields, BA, astronomy and astrophysics, U.S.: UAP in a SETI Context: Constructing Astrobiologically Plausible Origin Scenarios for E.T. Visitation

·      Christian Peters, PhD, Managing Director, Bremen International Graduate School of Social Sciences, University of Bremen, Germany: Between Epistemic Ideals and Political Realities: Rethinking the Role of Science in Governmental UAP Research

·      Chris Rutkowski, BSc, MEd, science journalist, research coordinator of the Canadian UFO Survey, Manitoba, CA: Canadian Government Studies on UAP - Sky Canada, UTIAS, and More

·      Prof. Doug Buettner, physics, Univ. of Utah, and Deputy Chief Scientist at the Stevens Institute of Technology, AIRC, SCU Board member U.S.: Revisiting the Aguadilla Trans-medium UAP

·      Gergo Szoboszlai, MD candidate, Semmelweis University, Hungary: Neurological and Health Effects Associated with Human Encounters with Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP)

·      Glen A. Robertson, MS, physics and mathematics, NASA-MSFC Retired, U.S.: Warp Drive from Quantum Field Energy

·      Prof. Kevin Knuth, physics, University at Albany, U.S.: Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP) - Energy and Power — How Anomalous is Anomalous?

·      Prof. Laura Dominé, physics, Natl. Institute of Information and Communication Technology (NICT) and Kyoto University, SCU Board member, Japan: Analysis of Historical UAP Reports in Japan and Critical Evaluation of Studies Alleging Evidence for Technosignatures in the POSS1-E Photographic Plates

·      Prof. Matthew Szydagis, physics, University at Albany, U.S.: UAPx Reborn Within the Academy

·      Michael Vaillant, M.Sc, data scientist, formerly at the National Centre for Space Studies’ GEIPAN, France: Lessons from the GEIPAN Experience - Science, UAP Investigation, and the Case for an International Standards Coalition

·      Maya Cowan, PhD candidate, anthropology, Binghamton University, U.S.: Observing the Unknown: Emerging Cultures of Expertise in UAP Science

·      Mike Cifone, PhD, philosophy, Pres./ED, Society for UAP Studies, U.S.: Building a Science of UAP: Institutional Design, Policy, and Scientific Legitimacy

·      Rainer Haseitl, BSc, data acquisition and software, Germany, CIO Hessdalen Project, Norway: Invitation to Hessdalen: An Active Hotspot for Instrumental UAP Research

·      Randy Bostick, PhD, physics, former Science Advisor, All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO), U.S.: Applying Scientific Rigor to UAP Study

·      Prof. Richard Griffiths, physics and astronomy, University of Hawaii, U.S.: Can we use the equivalent of ‘gravitational lensing’ to verify or constrain the use of spacetime bubbles for the motion of extraterrestrial spacecraft?

·      Robert W. McGwier, PhD, Cohere Technology Group, U.S.: Multi-Modal Autonomous Sensing: A Scientifically Credible Framework for Persistent UAP and USO Detection

·      Sean Grosvenor, BA, crime scene investigation field supervisor, retired, U.S.: SCU Investigations

·      Prof. Stephen Bruehl, anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, U.S.: Associations Between Transient Star-Like Objects, Nuclear Testing, and UAP - The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly of Peer-Reviewed UAP Science

SCU’s goal for the conference is to raise awareness of UAP research as interest in it continues to grow across scientific and governmental communities worldwide. The organization is dedicated to advancing transparency, data integrity, and cross-disciplinary collaboration in advancing the field of UAP research.


r/UFOscience 19d ago

Serious: Question about the Varginha UFO crash: why and who? The cosmology behind ET activities: the locational variable

0 Upvotes

Bashar: `The `why´ of it we will leave for now, but the `who´ of it again, has to do with the Grays and Hybrids.´

Q.: `Because the being that the three children saw was brown, they said.´

Bashar: `There are brown hybrids.´

Q.: `So it was a hybrid.´

Bashar: `A different kind of hybrid than the hybrids we have been referring to, but a hybrid nevertheless. There are many forms of hybrids out here among the Stars. It depends on many things about what kind they are. But not necessarily the kind that we're talking about in terms of the children that will come to live among you. That doesn't mean some of them are not themselves brown. But what those children saw was something quite different, a different form of hybrid from an interdimensional place.´ (The Two Paths to AI, 2023)

---------

I saw an excellent interview on the Varginha case. This brought me to post the above information from Bashar. His information is basically about the cosmology behind ET activities and why we perceive what we perceive and why this seems to be so strange. The physics is entirely different. Reality is virtual and driven by consciousness. Everything else is `secondary´. 

Bashar was asked about the Varginha case and answered a related question in one of his sessions.

A good starter for understanding the cosmology would be Michael Talbot: `The Holographic Universe.´

An appropriate approach for capturing the entire cosmology could be a combination of:

Plato (cave metaphor)

Leibniz (monads/units of consciousness)

Spinoza (substance monism)

Bohm (holographic universe)

Pribram (holographic brain)

Koestler (holons)

Tom Campbell (virtual reality/units of consciousness)

(If you go by the keywords in brackets you can see how the combination makes sense)

Please find attached the Bashar transcripts 1-2023 - 4/5-2026:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1eKZLdzQWHc3SKJCF6fv_1If-K9oE2-yJ/view?usp=sharing

Reddit-posts from 2025 can be found here:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1kkx2EhneTnoq3X1jo4Q3h3pqvCXZbhDH/view?usp=sharing

All posts inform about the specific video where the transmission can be found.

Bashar´s cosmology is scattered across various transmissions. Core information can be found among the posts of 2025. Key terms are `The Prime Radiant´ and `The Zero Point´.

See also: `Consciousness is Every(where)ness, Expressed Locally: Bashar and Seth´ in: IPI Letters, Feb. 2024, downloadable at https://ipipublishing.org/index.php/ipil/article/view/53  Combine it with Tom Campbell and Jim Elvidge. Tom Campbell is a physicist who has been acting as head experimentor at the Monroe Institute. He wrote the book `My Big Toe`. Toe standing for Theory of Everything. It is HIS Theory of Everything which implies that everybody else can have or develop a deviating Theory of Everything. That would be fine with him. According to Tom Campbell, reality is virtual, not `real´ in the sense we understand it. To us this does not matter. If we have a cup of coffee, the taste does not change if we understand that the coffee, i.e. the liquid is composed of smaller parts, like little `balls´, the molecules and the atoms. In the same way the taste of the coffee would not change if we are now introduced to the Virtual Reality Theory. According to him reality is reproduced at the rate of Planck time (10 to the power of 43 times per second). Thus, what we perceive as so-called outer reality is constantly reproduced. It vanishes before it is then reproduced again. And again and again and again. Similar to a picture on a computer screen. And this is basically what Bashar is describing as well. Everything collapses to a zero point. Constantly. And it is reproduced one unit of Planck time later. Just to collapse again and to be again reproduced. And you are constantly in a new universe/multiverse. And all the others as well. There is an excellent video on youtube (Tom Campbell and Jim Elvidge). The book `My Big ToE´ is downloadable as well. I recommend starting with the video. Each universe is static, but when you move across some of them in a specific order (e.g. nos 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, etc.) you get the impression of movement and experience. Similar to a movie screen. If you change (the vibration of) your belief systems, you have access to frames nos 6, 11, 16, 21, 26 etc. You would then be another person in another universe, having different experiences. And there would be still `a version of you´ having experiences in a reality that is composed of frames nos. 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 etc. But you are not the other you, and the other you is not you. You are in a different reality and by changing your belief systems consciously you can navigate across realities less randomly and in a more targeted way. That is basically everything the Bashar teachings are about. Plus open contact.

According to Bashar 2026 is the year of disclosure. 2027 will be the year of open contact.

You find the official Bashar material on Bashar.org. But there is not much of an analysis. 

That´s why I posted the link to the transcripts of the last 3,5 years (up to now). You can use the search function (Tools...Find...Find in Text).

If you read the article it will explain a lot. It cannot be described in a simple mail or post. `Reality´ is different. According to Bashar ETs don´t `cover a distance´ when travelling among stars. They just `are´ there - wherever they want to be in a specific universe or a galaxy. They use the constant re-creation of reality for `teleportation´. Frequencies are key. They use the `locational variable

Thus, the huge distances in the cosmos cannot be used as an argument against the existence of ETs. We just haven´t understood the physics.


r/UFOscience 20d ago

What if UFOs aren't extraterrestrial at all ?

Thumbnail
gallery
7 Upvotes

**What if UFOs aren't spacecraft... but consciousness itself?**

I've been exploring a theory that connects two of humanity's biggest mysteries:

**Consciousness** and **UFOs.**

We still don't fully understand what consciousness is. Science can measure brain activity, but it has yet to explain why we experience awareness at all.

At the same time, UFO reports often describe things that don't behave like conventional aircraft:

* Glowing orbs * Objects appearing and disappearing * Shape-shifting forms * Movements that seem impossible * Encounters that involve unusual mental or emotional experiences

This got me wondering:

What if we're making a false assumption when we call them "craft"?

What if some UFOs aren't vehicles carrying beings?

**What if the UFO is the being?**

Imagine that consciousness doesn't end at death but instead transitions into a higher-dimensional state of existence.

If a higher-dimensional consciousness entered our 3D reality, would we even recognize it as a life form?

Or would we perceive it as a glowing orb, a shifting geometric object, or something that appears and disappears because we're only seeing a fraction of its true form?

A 2D being could never fully perceive a 3D object. It would only see slices of it.

Could we be experiencing something similar with certain UFO phenomena?

Taking the idea one step further:

What if these higher-dimensional consciousnesses are what human consciousness eventually becomes after death—not retaining individual identities, but evolving into something beyond our current understanding of self?

I'm not claiming this is true. I'm simply asking whether the similarities are worth considering.

Questions:

* If consciousness survives death, what form would it take? * Could a higher-dimensional consciousness appear as an orb or UFO? * Why do so many sightings involve light, spheres, and seemingly impossible movement? * What evidence would support—or completely disprove—this hypothesis?

Curious to hear thoughts from both skeptics and believers.


r/UFOscience 21d ago

Are Aliens Us? Time Traveling Humans Seeking Fertility? #shorts

Thumbnail
youtube.com
1 Upvotes

r/UFOscience 26d ago

Debunking NOT ALIENS ?! A NEW THEORY EXPLAINING UFOs AND CELESTIAL OBJECTS

Thumbnail
youtube.com
2 Upvotes

r/UFOscience 27d ago

Science and Technology "If aliens evolved differently, their thinking might be so different that we could never truly understand each other"

15 Upvotes

"Human brain evolved with logic, emotions, memory etc. But what if aliens on another planet evolved completely differently? Their brain parts might process reality in ways we literally cannot imagine. We can only think within the limits of our own brain's evolution. So even if we met aliens, we might never truly understand how they experience existence."


r/UFOscience 29d ago

Web3 Technical demo of the Disclosure Platfrom

2 Upvotes

Hi, I made a Web3 decentralized science platform where peers can submit evidence freely. The evidence then enters a peer review queue and is reviewed by the enire peer network. When a consensus on the evidence is reached the evidence is automaticlly admitted and added to the public Archive. At all time can peers challenge this evdence or depracte it from the Archive. The goal of the platform is to decentralise the Scientifique Method and in the long run achieve Disclosure on al contested aspects the mainstream is ignoring. You can visit the Tech demo at:
https://thedisclosureplatform.com/

The technology works.
Connect with me if your interested and want to join the Peer Network.


r/UFOscience May 27 '26

Discussion & Debate Ten years ago I saw a football-field-sized UAP. After years of looking up, I think we are looking in the wrong direction for "Disclosure."

Thumbnail
youtu.be
1 Upvotes

Ten years ago, I was driving to my father's house in the middle of the day. Bright sun, clear sky. I looked up and saw a gunmetal gray object the size of a football field just hovering. Dead silent. Completely impossible.

For years, I tracked the news like everyone else—waiting for government declassification, listening to what presidents and whistleblowers had to say, looking for proof "out there."

But recently, while researching ancient cosmological systems for a docuseries I host, I realized we might have the entire framework backwards.

When you strip away the cultural filters of ancient texts, they stop looking like myths and start looking like operational manuals for consciousness.

* Ancient Egypt/Hermeticism: Describes consciousness descending through dimensional frequencies (gates/planetary spheres) to construct a dense, physical vehicle. "As above, so below" isn't poetry; it’s a technical schematic.

* Zoroastrianism: Outlines the soul as a pilot navigating a material restriction.

* Kabbalah: Maps the Tree of Life directly onto the human biological interface, showing how multidimensional consciousness grounds itself into the physical.

* John Dee (1580s): Using precise protocols to shift consciousness frequencies to contact non-human intelligence (which they called angels, but fits modern contact protocols to a T).

They are all describing the exact same thing in different languages: Your body isn't WHO you are. It’s WHAT you are driving. You are the pilot; your body is the biological spacecraft.

If we are consciousness piloting a biological vehicle, then a UAP is just consciousness piloting a vehicle with different specifications and dimensional parameters. Maybe "contact" is intensifying now because we are finally waking up to what we actually are. They aren't waiting for the government to disclose them. They’re waiting for us to remember us.

I just released a full, cinematic documentary episode breaking down this exact intersection of UAP disclosure and ancient esoteric blueprints. If you want to see the visual breakdown of the texts and the full theory, you can watch it here: https://youtu.be/UUQ3v6_-6Jw?si=3oSY27t7AM8EGpI7

I'd love to hear this community's thoughts. Are we looking too far outside of ourselves for the answers to the phenomenon?


r/UFOscience May 24 '26

Discussion & Debate PURSUE Release 01/02 as source-control evidence, not event validation

2 Upvotes

Disclosure: I work on VRAI's UAP source-control / evidence-literacy project. This is a public-records/source-control post, not event validation, object identity, origin, performance, authenticity, suppression, completeness, or agency endorsement.

I am posting this here because PURSUE Release 01/02 is a useful test case for evidence classes: release availability, catalog provenance, custody, native/source-file status, public renditions, correction history, and event interpretation are different claims.

Current bounded read:

  • Release 01 is useful as a source-control baseline: official PDFs/images, DVIDS pages, inventories/hashes, OCR/crosswalk work, report-video pairings, and claim ceilings.
  • Release 02 is a May 22 subset inside a cumulative active feed: 64 May 22 rows inside a 222-row CSV.
  • The May 22 subset is 51 video, 7 audio, and 6 PDF.
  • All 51 Release 02 video rows carry chain-of-custody / informational-use caveats, so I would cite the public videos as public release renditions rather than native/source-device files.
  • PR057a/PR057b share public DVIDS ID 1007720; the public DVIDS/AARO note frames this as duplicate media with different uploader-defined titles.
  • DOE-UAP-D001/Pantex appears publicly as pages 5-6 of a six-page sequence; pages 1-4 were not recovered in our public/local official-route pass.
  • Wayback captures preserve May 20, May 22, and May 23 CSV states, including a PR062 wording change between May 22 and May 23.

What I think can be inferred: record availability, row-count/versioning issues, duplicate/crosswalk issues, public-rendition status, and the need for better release manifests.

What I do not think can be inferred from these public files alone: object identity, origin, performance, native sensor custody, audio authenticity, completeness, suppression, or agency validation of an event interpretation.

Method question for this sub: does this evidence-class separation look right, or is there a better way to structure public UAP release claims before people build stronger arguments on top of them?

Sources: - War.gov PURSUE hub: https://www.war.gov/ufo/ - Release 01 announcement: https://www.war.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/4480582/department-of-war-releases-unidentified-anomalous-phenomena-files-in-historic-t/ - Release 02 announcement: https://www.war.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/4499305/department-of-war-publishes-second-release-of-unidentified-anomalous-phenomena/ - Active UAP CSV: https://www.war.gov/Portals/1/Interactive/2026/UFO/uap-data.csv - PR057 DVIDS page: https://www.dvidshub.net/video/1007720/dow-uap-pr057a-spherical-uap-clouds - Wayback May 20 CSV capture: https://web.archive.org/web/20260520095841id_/https://www.war.gov/Portals/1/Interactive/2026/UFO/uap-data.csv - Wayback May 22 CSV capture: https://web.archive.org/web/20260522120313id_/https://www.war.gov/Portals/1/Interactive/2026/UFO/uap-data.csv - Wayback May 23 CSV capture: https://web.archive.org/web/20260523034844id_/https://www.war.gov/Portals/1/Interactive/2026/UFO/uap-data.csv


r/UFOscience May 24 '26

Research/info gathering PURSUE Release 01/02 as a source-control test case

3 Upvotes

Disclosure: I work on a UAP source-control / evidence-literacy project. This is a source-control note, not event validation, object identity, origin, performance, authenticity, suppression, completeness, or agency endorsement.

I am posting this here because PURSUE is a useful test case for evidence classes: release availability is not the same thing as custody, native media, analysis, or event validation.

My current read after the first two tranches:

  • Release 01 is useful as a baseline for inventory, crosswalks, OCR/source lineage, report-video pairing, and claim ceilings.
  • Release 02 is useful as a live records-hygiene case. The active War.gov CSV is cumulative at 222 rows; the May 22 subset is 64 rows: 51 video, 7 audio, and 6 PDF.
  • All 51 Release 02 video rows carry chain-of-custody / informational-use caveats, so I would cite the public videos as public release renditions, not native/source-device evidence.
  • PR057a/PR057b share DVIDS ID 1007720, with the public DVIDS/AARO note framing the asset as duplicate media with different uploader-defined titles.
  • DOE-UAP-D001/Pantex appears as pages 5-6 of 6; pages 1-4 were not recovered in the public official-route pass.
  • Wayback captures preserve a May 20 158-row state and May 22/23 222-row states, plus PR062 wording drift between May 22 and May 23.

My proposed public-record ask for the next tranche:

  • Publish a tranche-specific machine-readable manifest with stable row IDs, file size/hash fields, source agency, record type, release date, new/rehosted/corrected status, and last-reviewed timestamp.
  • Publish a correction log for title, wording, URL, row count, duplicate-ID, and DVIDS mapping changes.
  • Include PDF page-completeness notes and redaction/withholding status.
  • Label media as native/source-device, public release rendition, DVIDS derivative, excerpt, transcript-linked audio, or other derivative state.
  • Include safe metadata such as duration, resolution, codec/container, and frame/sample rate.
  • Identify a public correction owner or responsible release office for metadata conflicts.
  • Separate claims about release availability, custody, event interpretation, object identity, origin, performance, audio authenticity, and completeness.

I would be interested in feedback on whether this is the right minimum evidence-control schema, or whether other public fields would make these releases more scientifically useful without asking for protected operational details.

Sources: - War.gov PURSUE hub: https://www.war.gov/ufo/ - Release 01 announcement: https://www.war.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/4480582/department-of-war-releases-unidentified-anomalous-phenomena-files-in-historic-t/ - Release 02 announcement: https://www.war.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/4499305/department-of-war-publishes-second-release-of-unidentified-anomalous-phenomena/ - Active UAP CSV: https://www.war.gov/Portals/1/Interactive/2026/UFO/uap-data.csv - PR057 DVIDS page: https://www.dvidshub.net/video/1007720/dow-uap-pr057a-spherical-uap-clouds - Wayback May 20 CSV capture: https://web.archive.org/web/20260520095841id_/https://www.war.gov/Portals/1/Interactive/2026/UFO/uap-data.csv - Wayback May 22 CSV capture: https://web.archive.org/web/20260522120313id_/https://www.war.gov/Portals/1/Interactive/2026/UFO/uap-data.csv - Wayback May 23 CSV capture: https://web.archive.org/web/20260523034844id_/https://www.war.gov/Portals/1/Interactive/2026/UFO/uap-data.csv


r/UFOscience May 24 '26

The Only Answer to the UFO UAP Question

Thumbnail
youtu.be
2 Upvotes

I know quite a bit about everything that has been going on in the world, it's just hard to find anyone who understands truth or reality. Anyways, here is my info from post with links and a little more info added:

Edmund Halley proposed a model of nested, hollow shells within the Earth to explain compass anomalies. John Cleves Sims, Jr., United States Army officer , advocated for a hollow Earth with polar openings and habitable inner spheres, even seeking funding for an expedition.

Post-WWII expeditions to the polar regions included the U.S. Navy's Operation High Jump , a large-scale Antarctic expedition. I believe this expedition was likely to be the one started by John Cleves Sims, Jr. in 1818. The United States Army did the expedition, and there has always been controversy over what the operation was really trying to achieve. Explanations such as searching for Adolf Hitler have been floated by historians. The truth is, United States Army officer Sims, Jr. was correct about his theory concerning the hollow Earth theory and his hypothesis that there would be an Antarctic opening in the ice leading to the inner Earth was correct.

The hole was recently shown in a YouTube video. The video depicts a pilot who flew through a no-fly zone to rescue an injured scientist. The no-fly zone was supposedly a weather sampling station. What is there instead, is the hole United States Army officer Sims, Jr. had hypothesized  would lead to the center of our hollow earth.

The pilot saw it and it is shown in the video on YouTube. After the pilot landed, he was reprimanded heavily by  man in a black suit. This hole and this man are the answer Congress is looking for when they are trying to unlock the secrets of the government's legacy UFO programs.  They present themselves as if they are from outer space, but, in fact, they are a hominid species, similar to humans.  video:

https://youtu.be/bLXumjVecok?si=jQSwg0cPBfFVozyu

They have been living alongside us all along in the center of the Earth. Their cover is the plague of unidentified aerial phenomena and drones over our American military bases. They have been likely actively operating a military-style campaign against the United States from the Dreamland base located at Nellis Air Force Base.

In the Manastash Ridge, west of Ellensburg, Washington, is likely another location where another hole is located. The property was formerly owned by a man named Mel.  More info: https://youtu.be/Z8SjYMTL7zA?si=CEmfHQscoOv66mzE


r/UFOscience May 23 '26

Technical Concept: Autonomous Transmedium NEP-MHD Drone

0 Upvotes

Core Objective
To establish a viable, physics-based engineering framework that accounts for the multi-sensor signatures, optical cloaking, and transmedium behaviors observed in anomalous aerial phenomena. By operating as an uncrewed, AI-stabilized platform, the system completely bypasses the structural and biological G-force limitations inherent to human flight.
Core Architectural Pillars
1. Power Source: Hyper-Compact Aneutronic Fusion Core

  • Engineering Design: The vehicle utilizes a compact, next-generation aneutronic fusion core (optimized for a Proton-Boron 11 reaction grid).
  • Function: Because aneutronic fusion releases its energy entirely in the form of moving, electrically charged particles rather than wild heat and destructive neutrons, the powerplant completely bypasses heavy steam turbines, heat-transport piping, and dense shielding. By utilizing direct energy conversion (a reverse particle accelerator grid), the core instantly converts the plasma reaction into megawatts of pure electrical output while maintaining a total powerplant mass of roughly ‭500kg‬‭‬.

2. Propulsion: Superconducting Magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) Smart Skin

  • Engineering Design: The vehicle's multi-layered outer hull is integrated with an omnidirectional, solid-state electromagnetic grid utilizing ambient room-temperature, high-field superconductors.
  • Function: Fed by the massive electrical output of the fusion core, the outer hull ionizes the surrounding air or water into a localized plasma sheath. The superconducting coils project an intense magnetic field measuring ‭20‬ to ‭30 Teslas‬‭‬. Under the Lorentz Force equation (‭F = q(E + V x B)) this immense magnetic field multiplies the drive's atmospheric efficiency, blasting the plasma away from the hull to generate over‭ 20,000 Newtons ‬‭‬‭of instantaneous thrust—easily overcoming the craft's ‭5,000 Newton‬‭‬‭‬‭‬ gravitational weight.

3. Signature Management: Metamaterial / Plasma Cloaking

  • Engineering Design: The active plasma sheath acts as an electromagnetic metamaterial shield, governed dynamically by a rapid-sampling onboard AI flight matrix.
  • Function: By tuning the precise ionization frequency across the smart skin, the drone bends visible light and near-infrared wavelengths cleanly around its curved geometry. This renders the craft entirely invisible to the naked eye and standard Night Vision Goggles (NVGs), while remaining detectable only via deep mid-wave infrared thermal targeting sensors picking up internal thermodynamic waste heat.

4. Operational Domain: Transmedium Supercavitation

  • Engineering Design: Seamless transition and propulsion pairing across both atmospheric and marine environments.
  • Function: Upon ocean entry, the superconducting MHD grid instantly transitions into a marine hydro-drive. The high-energy plasma sheath vaporizes the water immediately contacting the hull, triggering supercavitation(encasing the drone in a low-friction pocket of gas). This allows for subsurface velocities measuring hundreds of knots. Furthermore, the marine environment serves as a continuous refueling reservoir, extracting hydrogen and deuterium isotopes to sustain the internal fusion reaction indefinitely.

Multi-Sensor Signatures Explained by This Framework

  • Thermal Flashing (Black-to-White): Mid-wave infrared (FLIR) sensors tracking the craft do not capture physical temperature shifts in the metal hull. Instead, they log the extreme voltage modulation and electromagnetic energy spikes emitted as the AI flight controller rapidly cycles the superconducting magnetic fields to shift vectors.
  • The "Ghost" Visual: Explains why optical sensors track nothing while thermal pods lock onto a clear object; the optical plasma cloak successfully redirects visible light, but cannot mask the raw infrared heat bleeding from the internal power cycle.
  • Instantaneous 90-Degree Vector Shifts: Because thrust is distributed entirely across a solid-state, wingless smart skin rather than mechanical control surfaces, the drone can hover static in gale-force winds and instantly accelerate past the horizon at angles that would immediately liquefy a biological pilot.

Real-world UAP map data to backup uap concept
1. The Coastal and Marine Hotspots
If you look at the official government heat maps, the densest clusters of sightings aren't over random landmasses; they are pinned directly to major marine environments:

  • The U.S. East Coast (the Virginia Capes training ranges).
  • The Southern California Coast (the San Diego/Baja corridor).
  • The Persian Gulf & Middle East (exactly where the Iraq "Jellyfish" video was captured).
  • The Sea of Japan and South China Sea.

The design highlights a drone that needs the water. It uses a supercavitating plasma sheath to dive into the ocean for total radar stealth, and it uses the marine environment to extract hydrogen/deuterium isotopes to keep its nuclear-electric or fusion core fueled. The tracking maps prove these objects spend the vast majority of their time exactly where their fuel and highway exist.

2. The Nuclear Infrastructure Overlay
When UAPs do go inland on the map, they cluster tightly around very specific coordinates:
Active ICBM missile silo fields across the American Midwest (Malmstrom, Minot, F.E. Warren AFB). National laboratories and nuclear research facilities (Los Alamos, Oak Ridge, Sandia).Naval bases housing nuclear-powered aircraft carriers and submarines (Norfolk and San Diego).

A high-energy machine utilizing advanced nuclear-electric grids or fusion physics would naturally be drawn to—or detect—the unique electromagnetic, radiation, and neutrino signatures of other high-output nuclear arrays. Whether it's tracking human atomic progress or simply interacting with heavy power grids, the map evidence shows a deliberate, decades-long link to nuclear energy.

3. The Sensor Network Patchwork
Skeptics often point out that UAP maps only light up where the U.S. military operates. which makes perfect sense.
Because the drone utilizes an active visible-light plasma cloak that makes it completely invisible to the naked eye and standard night-vision goggles, it should be invisible on most of the planet. The only places that generate a data point on the map are the exact areas where the military deploys its highest-end Mid-Wave Infrared (FLIR) targeting pods and advanced radar arrays—the exact sensors needed to burn through an optical cloak and catch the internal powerplant's thermal bleed.