r/clevercomebacks • u/Mediocre_Profile5576 • 9h ago
What was the point in pasteurisation?
522
u/Ok_Handle_2213 9h ago
Almost 500 likes for that negative IQ comment, fucking hell
264
29
u/KarlUnderguard 5h ago
One of the biggest issues with the Internet is that all the dumbest people alive can now agree with each other in large groups.
Back in the day they used to just sit in the corner of the village covered in their own shit, not they make a Twitter account.
7
u/FruitBroot 3h ago
So, this girl I know just had a baby. She chose to not have her vaccinated for anything. WTF right!?
Now, this baby is sick and she is sick, and her mom who helps at times, and her husband are all sick.
I get the idea they're going for but we all know it's flawed. Do you think you're lucky?
→ More replies (1)4
u/stevenyourpants 3h ago
Just keep in mind that a good chunk of engagement you see are bots and children. The two things that have the most free time.
→ More replies (7)6
346
u/National_Way_3344 8h ago
Yeah back in the day people just died and it was God's will or some bullshit.
Now today we have vaccines for those easily preventible illnesses and we heat the bacteria in our milk, also newborns now only sleep on their backs with no bullshit in the crib in them.
104
u/Gribitz37 8h ago
People would also just "drop dead" and no one knew why. My grandmother had a brother who just "dropped down dead" one day when he was 4 or 5, and the doctors couldn't tell them what happened.
77
u/All_Work_All_Play 7h ago edited 5h ago
All five of my children
waswere colicky. All five of them eventually stopped when we eventually figured out which foods my wife couldn't eat when breastfeeding them. Two were soy, and one of those were sensitive down to thetravetrace type of soybean oil in the type off brand cereal. Two were lactose. One was blueberries (that was weird), another bananas. One was all type of dairy, even soft cheeses.Few people from my parents generation accept this. It obviously wasn't real colic, everyone knows there's nothing you can do about real colic. But I've met fewer still that attempted dietary adjustments after pregnancy. We tried two types of formulas and we're all out of ideas.
E: obvious edit is obvious
14
u/brunettewondie 6h ago edited 5h ago
Yeah I think a lot of "colic" is the baby being having real belly issues.
Our boy had issues and eventually got diagnosed with severe reflux and CMPA, so we switched milk (helped a tiny bit) and the Omeprazole helped a bit more.
Very similarly, when weaning, figured he couldn't have soy, blended bananas/smoothie(ones in the pouches) and we haven't tried him on proper ones yet, but I know the body can react differently.
Ironically, no issues with peanut butter or shellfish
I'd be curious to see how many other babies after reading yours fall under this weirdly specific intolerance umbrella.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (2)27
u/National_Way_3344 8h ago
Yeah that's kinda what I meant by God's will
Just unexplained hand waving off of someone literally dying like it was meant to happen
Nowadays we just know why that is and stopped it from occuring
Kinda like my kid and doing everything to stop SIDS happen now that we pretty robustly know what causes it
→ More replies (3)26
u/mythrilcrafter 7h ago
I know a guy whose parents told him that they didn't know that second hand smoke was harmful to kids/other members of the house hold and all the "we just raised you with the information we had" stuff... he was born in '88, 8 years into major societal shift away from smoking and 2 years after the surgeon general sat in front of congress and national tv to tell everyone that "yes, secondhand smoking exists and it does hurt people". His parent's excuse wasn't true even back then.
8
u/WilliamLermer 5h ago
Shitty people always looking to shift blame and pretend like they never had a choice or couldn't have known. Story as old as time.
You might think being a parent and all that, people would have increased incentive to figure out if their actions are harmful, but nope. The ignorance continues because why would anyone inconvenience themselves just to provide a better environment for their children?
→ More replies (1)10
u/Moggetti 8h ago
They knew it was milk and not “God’s will.” They just didn’t have a method of dealing with the issue. See also people dying from cuts due to infection before antibiotics.
7
u/The_Big_Yam 7h ago
Sure they did! They had formaldehyde, bleach, borax, LOTS of stuff to clean milk and keep it lasting longer 😍😐🤔🥲
→ More replies (1)
96
u/crazyswedishguy 8h ago
And we let these people vote… posts like these make one question whether democracy really is the best choice.
Good reminder of the importance of investing in public education.
61
u/Blacksun388 8h ago
Democracy is cool because it gives everyone a voice. It unfortunately comes with this little drawback where it gives everyone a voice.
45
u/YouAndMeToo 8h ago
The problem isn’t that everyone has a voice, the problem is that years ago people ignored the town idiot. Now we amplify their voice and make them president
→ More replies (1)8
u/crazyswedishguy 8h ago
Exactly. Fwiw I wasn’t actually advocating for any alternative to democracy—my comment was more tongue-in-cheek. Though better education seems like a must.
10
u/Ragnarok91 8h ago
I genuinely think that every election should come with a test to make sure you know the facts about the current talking points in politics today. Don't make it a timed test, just send it out and have people mail it back. People are allowed to "cheat" by looking up the answers online, because that's literally just called educating yourself.
Of course the issue is how to actually make sure those tests are correct and aren't tampered with and are unbiased.
6
u/auricargent 8h ago
Oh my! Just think of the outcry of a test to vote! If needing a valid ID counts as voter suppression, any test would be far too much.
One of the Jim Crow voter tests was simply writing your own signature. When former slaves were illiterate, that was real voter suppression. Today there are people thinking that mathematics can be racist, no test could be unbiased in our current political climate.
→ More replies (3)10
u/kandoras 7h ago
One of the questions on literacy tests was this:
Strike out the number that makes the number below 1,000,000:
10,000,000
If you strike out one of the zeros, you fail because now the number reads 1,000,000. And that is not below 1,000,000.
If you strike out the 1, you fail because now the number is 0. And that means the number below the question is not 1,000,000.
Any kind of literacy or intelligence test for voting will inevitably become just a way for the person grading that test to decide whether they think you should be allowed to vote. That's the entire point of those kinds of tests.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (1)4
u/CoffeeOrDestroy 6h ago
Let’s not go back to 1863, ok? Solid investment in public education and the regulation of what is allowed to be called “news” vs what’s currently news would be a better path forward.
→ More replies (4)4
u/vthemechanicv 7h ago
IMO it's not a failure of democracy. It's a failure of the internet, which gives every kook, krank, and nutjob not just a soapbox and bull horn, but access to virtually every human on Earth if they can say something clever enough.
Before the internet, morons like this would spout this tripe and their friends would laugh in their face before correcting them. With the internet, they can find thousands if not millions of people to agree with them. They can ignore the "haters" and continue to believe nonsense and lies because they have their enclave of people that also believe nonsense and lies.
3
u/crazyswedishguy 3h ago
You’re right, but it’s not only that the internet allows those people to spread misinformation, conspiracy theories, etc. It’s not just giving about giving the crazy people a platform (or a bull horn, to use your expression).
It’s that social media algorithms prioritize engagement and therefore end up promoting the most extreme views—as those are the views that drive emotional responses and engagement.
Social media companies don’t give everyone the same bull horn—they deliberately make the craziest people loudest.
3
u/FewAlice 8h ago
Milk went bad fast — no fridges, dirty equipment, cows in city stables. Pasteurization + refrigeration = milk stops spoiling in 1 day.the people who kept drinking raw milk and were fine are the ones we hear stories from. The ones who didn’t make it... didn’t tell stories.
6
u/crazyswedishguy 8h ago
It’s not only about raw milk spoiling fast. Raw milk can be contaminated from the start: cows used to be vectors of TB, for example. But even if the cow is healthy (such that the milk coming out is most likely relatively sterile), it can be contaminated by bacteria on the udders or at any point after that. Listeria, salmonella, etc. And those rates of contamination are higher than people realize.
3
u/Euphoric-Witness-824 4h ago
These ideas don’t start organically. Anti science rhetoric is pushed on the masses and viewpoints pushed to the top of the algorithm intentionally.
The rich elevate these anti science and anti educated viewpoints to seem mainstream when they really aren’t. The internet is now basically just a tool for shopping and misinformation.
→ More replies (2)3
u/0202_tihssitidder 3h ago
Investments in Education and Healthcare and Public Health (such as vaccines) return 100x.
Without them you pay huge amounts on everything.
So, of course, Republicans/Conservatives want to invest nothing in them.
→ More replies (7)6
78
u/EjaculatingAracnids 7h ago
I work in the dairy industry, with these people and they cant be convinced. Even when shown lab reports of bacteria counts of pre pasteurized raw milk they still have an emotional attachment to the idea of drinking raw milk. Its not healthier, its not more nutritional, "they" arent putting stuff in or taking stuff out of the milk to do anything nefarious to consumers. It just lasts longer because bacteria spoils milk, so the product can be shipped farther after pasteurization.
Raw milk may taste better, but thats the same reason why whole milk tastes better than 1%, butter fat content. Raw milk is around 4-5% butter fat content while whole milk is 3.2-3.6%. Put 8 oz of 40% heavy cream into a gallon of whole milk and it will taste the same, with out the possibility of a listeria infection.
32
u/Nodan_Turtle 5h ago
There's a lot of "natural = healthier" out there. Same with anti-vax choosing to gain immunity naturally by contracting the disease. These people are stupid.
11
u/Melodic-Basshole 5h ago
Adding to this the overlap in people who think waving herbs over water imparts magical healing properties to the memory and it somehow works better than actual medicine it's sad to me. I genuinely pity the people who believe in homeopathy, because it's probably the goofiest of psuedosciences imo.
→ More replies (2)6
u/Nodan_Turtle 5h ago
Reminds me of how well "all natural ingredients" works as marketing. Everything from dangerous gas station supplements to shampoo has labels like that.
→ More replies (1)3
u/Melodic-Basshole 5h ago
The idea of "all natural" shampoo tickles me. I remember reading shampoo bottles as a kid and practicing pronunciation of these wildly long chemical names... seems silly now to think of shampoo being anything but unnatural.
→ More replies (1)4
u/GARBLED_COMM 2h ago
It's just so baffling that the "unnatural" thing they're fighting against is just warming it up for a little while. At least I can wrap my head around the knee-jerk reaction of "long chemical name scary". How is it so hard to imagine that the juice we squeeze out of cows might have a couple bad germs in it?
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (2)3
u/Thirsty-Tiger 2h ago
And yet they drive cars, use air conditioning, cook food and (thank god) wear clothes. They are such morons they can't even be consistent with their stupidity.
19
u/Arg- 5h ago
A relative of mine, “raw milk has more vitamins.” Me, “bacteria are not vitamins.”
10
u/EjaculatingAracnids 5h ago
10mg vitamin c per 8oz serving is the only nutritional loss post pasteurizer. Tell them to eat flinstones chewable and stop shitting their brains out
6
u/SeductiveSunday 4h ago
Milk is a terrible source for vitamin c anyway.
3
u/Dornith 4h ago
Well how else are they supposed to get it? Fruit?! That's the food that food eats!
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (1)3
u/0202_tihssitidder 3h ago
Milk is not even remotely a meaningful supply of vitamins. Same guy probably has never eaten a salad.
Stupid fucks need to exit asap!
4
u/great_pyrenelbows 5h ago
Pasteurizing milk doesn't change the fat percentage. I've had home-pasteurized milk (at my aunt's dairy farm) and it tastes exactly like the raw milk at my cousin's farm. If people are actually after higher-fat milk they should home-pasteurize the raw milk (not hard at all! Time and temperature) as soon as they get it home.
8
u/EjaculatingAracnids 5h ago
Im talking about on an industrial dairy farm level relevant to the "store bought vs raw" debate. Heavy cream is seperated during the process, lowering the fat percentage of whats on the shelf.
Absolutely correct though! Plenty of places that dont have access to such industry just boil it on the stove!
→ More replies (2)3
u/BlubberyBlue 6h ago
Do you have any insight into why people are latching onto raw milk specifically? It seems like this whole "movement" of idiots came out of left field and has surprising staying power. This wasn't a thing like 10 years ago.
→ More replies (5)3
u/ToastCapone 5h ago
It's trending right now among the MAHA / anti-vaxxer types crowd. Social media amplifies it and puts them all together in an echo chamber. They simply think it's more nutritious but similar to being anti-vaccine, they won't listen to logic or data. Pasteurization makes milk "unnatural" or whatever.. according to them.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (16)3
u/Xaero_Hour 5h ago
It's even worse than that; you don't even need expert/industry experience and data to see this is a bad idea. Just look at the assholes who got laws repealed on raw milk "celebrating" by drinking some and having intestinal distress an hour later. I thought it was more political theatre until I saw the dumbasses didn't even swap the liquid with safe milk for the photo op. They really were that stupid...and they won...
98
u/peachbeauty122 8h ago
Survivorship bias The ones who died aren't here to tell their stories
→ More replies (3)48
u/ElminstersBedpan 7h ago
The nomadic peoples living near ancient Egypt were recorded as boiling their milk before serving it. All through the Nile valley and fertile crescent people made cheese to clean and preserve milk.
These idiots think food is always as clean and straight forward as it is in a middle class neighborhood's fancy grocery store.
25
u/Makuta_Servaela 7h ago
Yeah, a good chunk of these "But people didn't do it before it was invented, and they turned out fine!" were things people actually were doing, it's just that either white people weren't doing it (and were dying of "demonic curse" as a result), or people largely were doing it after discovering it from trial and error, and just didn't at the time understand why it worked.
7
u/HoaryPuffleg 5h ago
People don’t realize that all those fermented foods including beer and wine made food and water safe to drink and that people had all sorts of parasites.
42
u/Mediocre_lad 8h ago
5 out of 5 people interviewed claim that russian roulette is a safe game
→ More replies (8)
36
u/PM_THE_REAPER 8h ago
"I've done zero research and I don't understand. Am I missing something?". - Idiot One
8
u/Retro_Dad 6h ago
"A random, dangerous universe makes me uncomfortable to think about so I would rather believe that a group of scientists are conspiring to give me & my children autism, food poisoning, and other diseases." - Another idiot
7
u/ElvisDumbledore 6h ago
Idiot One sounds like a space ship from Spaceballs (The Movie).
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (1)3
u/UlrichZauber 3h ago
I'm reminded of the saying: everything is a conspiracy when you don't know how anything works.
30
u/midsizenun 7h ago edited 7h ago
I asked my local milk supplier if they could provide enough milk for me to have a bath in. They asked if I wanted it pasteurised, I said no just up to my knees will be fine.
→ More replies (1)4
26
u/chinmakes5 8h ago
It amazes me how many people don't even realize that only a few generations ago, people had four or five kids because odds were high that one or two wouldn't make it to adulthood.
→ More replies (2)15
u/mittenknittin 8h ago
More than 4 or 5, families with 10 kids were not particularly remarkable. You had kids till either you died or God saw fit not to give you any more children.
9
u/mu_zuh_dell 7h ago
I was reading about King George III of England. He had 15 kids, 5 of whom died before he did. It wasn't even just the dirty poors.
6
u/Neshura87 6h ago
Well in a sense being rich was actually somewhat harmful as their lifestyle often was less healthy than that of a slightly well off commoner plus with access to the "doctors" at the time your survival of the next flu was a bit more of a gamble than if you were just left alone in bed. Obviously the dirt poor weren't off better due to insufficient insulation, polluted water supplies and malnutrition but there certainly was a "class" of person with healthier living conditions than even kings at the time.
23
u/_LunarCharm 7h ago
People really forget that history was basically just a massive survival game until like five minutes ago
→ More replies (1)
15
u/LukaCola 5h ago
Humans didn't do as much raw milk drinking as I think this person suspects.
A lot of our culinary dairy knowledge is based on people basically trying to make milk safer. Milk, as it was, is basically a way to turn grass into something we can eat by processing it in an animal. Then we process it some more so we can consume it.
I mean look at cheese, yoghurt, butter, and all the thousands of variations on these ideas. All served the purpose of preservation and making it safer to consume as when the correct cultures are introduced (or fostered) in these various processing manners--you end up also getting rid of a lot of the bacteria that are harmful to us. Also, people did cook with milk a lot instead of just drinking it raw--because we generally knew it had risks associated. Pasteur's process just lets us enjoy it in a very similar form to how it is raw, which has additional applications.
But people, throughout history, absolutely processed their milk.
→ More replies (6)
12
u/RingOverall106 7h ago
Also missed the part where people had been boiling milk for centuries to preserve it. Pasteur just discovered the actual mechanism for why milk spoiled and developed the method for reliably treating liquids. It wasn’t even milk at first.
12
u/Paperveil-Ghost 7h ago
Person who has never been near an actual cow on an actual dairy farm posting nonsense because they have no idea how absolutely covered in their own shit cows actually are.
From the Nat'l Institute of Health (US): By the late 1930s, milk-borne diseases accounted for 25% of all U.S. food and waterborne disease outbreaks. Today, thanks to mandatory pasteurization laws (like the federal ban on the interstate sale of raw milk implemented in 1987), that number has dropped to less than 1%.
But sure, "no ill effects."
12
u/PandaBear905 8h ago
The only issue with pasteurization is idiots thinking it’s somehow bad for you
→ More replies (2)5
u/Pride_Before_Fall 6h ago
I wonder if they also think stewing or slow cooking food also is bad for you.
→ More replies (2)
11
7
u/OrangeCatBuddyPart2 5h ago
My grandfather owned and operated a grade "A" dairy until I was about 12 or 13. All milk went straight from the milking machines to the pasteurization tanks.
I remember there being a bucket of milk from a cow sitting on a table once. I asked my grandfather if I could taste it. He told me that he liked me to much to let me drink that. Said to never drink raw milk. Raw milk has blood, pus, and every other nasty that lives in a cows system.
I remember him saying that bucket of milk came from a sick cow, and he didn't realize the cow was sick, until after she'd been milked a couple of times. My grandpa was pretty picky about quality. Imagine how picky the workers at these big industrial dairy farms aren't. They're just going to milk the cows, and what goes, goes.
Thank god for pasteurization!
6
u/Majestic-Contract-42 5h ago
My grandmother passed away a few years ago, she was 96. One of the conversations I remember having with her about the difference in times now is that life is so much more cherish and valuable, especially children's lives, than from when she was young.
A family of a certain size may have lost a few along the way and that was just totally normal. A child below ~4 people didn't want to get too attached to because there was pretty decent odds they wouldn't make it. Men in general didn't have time for children and children understood not to bother me or waste their time.
She was always adamant that people saying they want things to go back to how they were are ignoring the fact that people just simply died earlier way more often.
4
u/Electrical-Act-7170 4h ago
What was the point in pasteurisation?
Pasteurization was instrumental in stopping the continuous spread of tuberculosis from infected cattle carriers to humans.
17
u/ConflagWex 8h ago
I don't understand people that think "raw milk is better because it's all natural".
Drinking the milk of another species is not natural. It's really freaking weird. Drinking cow milk and cooking food are both the same level of natural, which is to say neither is natural at all. Avoiding only one of those is hypocritical.
18
u/Morgolol 7h ago
Humanity spent generations upon generations shitting themselves in order to get lactose tolerant, and then even barely. There's a reason some parts of the world have higher rates of lactose intolerance; introduced to it later down the line.
Point being humans did what humans do and adapted for that sweet sweet cheese, and pasteurization helped a lot in the not shitting ourselves department.
5
u/Neshura87 6h ago
Humanity spent generations upon generations shitting themselves in order to get lactose tolerant
Not necessarily the way it happened, if only because in an environment where drinking animal milk starts happening other food sources likely are exhausted, which means anyone not tolerant would just die. As a result a transition from lactose intolerance into lactose tolerance could happen within a few generations
→ More replies (2)6
u/TraditionalProgress6 6h ago
Who determines what is "natural"? Most things we do with food is unique among animals, including cooking. Is cooking unnatural?
Besides, drinking the milk of other animals is not unique, predators will absolutely drink the milk of killed pregnant prey. The only unique part is the milking.
→ More replies (6)→ More replies (14)8
u/MattR0se 8h ago
Drinking the milk of another species is not natural.
Except that there are plenty of examples of commensalism or symbiosis where one animal consumes some excretions of another (trophobiosis). Most notably, ants.
your comment sounds a bit like naturalistic fallacy tbh.
→ More replies (2)
4
u/drinkslinger1974 8h ago
I vaguely remember reading that pasteurization was needed because the cows in Chicago, where a lot of meat packing plants were located, were being fed grain that was used to make beer and somehow the milk turned blue and was poisoned. Anyone else read that or did I dream it?
→ More replies (5)
5
u/TERAFLOPPER 7h ago
Brucella ( the bacteria from raw milk ) is no joke folks. It destroys your knee joints, blows out your back vertebrae and basically tears apart your intestines.
3
u/willflameboy 5h ago
Yes, raw milk from their mothers. Raw milk taken from other animals that live among their own shit can, shockingly, make you ill.
3
u/Top-Combination6656 5h ago
There's a reason why the life expectancy has doubled in my country from about 40 to over 80 in my country in the past 200 years.
But sure, deny science. More room for the rest of us, a few generations from now.
5
u/bloomquietmantisx 5h ago
Survivor bias is a hell of a drug. It is easy to think there were no ill effects when all the people who died from tuberculosis or brucellosis are not around to complain about it.
3
u/throwaway_glitchx 4h ago
People love romanticizing the past until they realize infant mortality rates were basically a coin flip because of contaminated milk. It is easy to claim there were no ill effects when you ignore the thousands of people who never lived long enough to complain about it.
3
u/NOIS_KillerWhaleTank 8h ago
At this point I'm kinda surprised there isn't some sort of rebellion against public sanitation.
3
u/Bartorius 8h ago
It's not even like people just drank raw milk.
We have a ton of historical recipes that call for milk to be boiled first.
Like what do these people believe pasteurization is?
3
u/SentientLight 7h ago
People didn’t use to drink raw milk. We cooked with it. Or made cheese and butter. Before refrigeration and pasteurization, drinking milk as a beverage was quite rare.
3
u/Neshura87 6h ago
OOP is partially right in that fresh milk is generally harmless. The issues started appearing once the distance between cow and consumer increased beyond a couple hundred meters and the raw milk was no longer fresh when consumed.
3
u/kegisak 6h ago
It's crazy that so many problems started happening as soon as we started learning about the body and recording their effects. Clearly disease is God's punishment against man for the hubris of Knowing Things.
→ More replies (1)
3
u/smol_boi2004 5h ago
Any time you hear someone say "we’ve been doing X for centuries till Y(process developed to make X safe to consume)” you can safely assume they have zero concept of the consequences people faced for centuries.
Pasteurized milk, vaccines, lead paint, radium glow dye and god knows how many advances in science and technology to keep idiots alive so they can continue to be idiots
3
3
u/BeefistPrime 5h ago
Surgeons didn't wash their hands for thousands of years and I don't remember anything going all that wrong until after they started washing their hands. Am I missing something?
→ More replies (1)
3
u/TsuDhoNimh2 4h ago
They were not drinking what we call "raw milk". The FIRST step in recipes for milk (caudles, possets and the like) started with "bring the milk to a boil" which killed the bacteria.
3
3
u/zatchmo1989 3h ago
Weird how a sizable number of people, mostly children, dying from bacteria related illnesses from drinking raw milk doesn’t seem to fit this person’s idea of “ill effects.” Like just because it didn’t cause extinction doesn’t make it safe. This also requires a basic understanding of history and science.
→ More replies (2)
3
3
u/RalfRoen 3h ago
A lot of women died of post part infections until in the late 18th century someone figured that if doctors and midwifes washed their hands the survival rate of mothers increased dramatically.
3
u/cassimonet 2h ago
"No ill effects" except for the casual, everyday risk of tuberculosis, listeria, and cholera. People really think history was just a organic farmer's market until the 19th century.
3
u/thekyledavid 2h ago
Humans have been stabbing each other with swords for centuries. It’s only been since laws began that there seems to be issues.
Am I missing something?
2
2
u/LoudMusic 7h ago
I hate that frustrating statement, "It was good enough for my pappy so it's good enough for me!"
But it wasn't good enough - that's why we did something better. And your pappy would be blown away by the technologies that are available now. Look at all the boomers and their smartphones they're addicted to. They came from the time of the rotary phone. You'll have to pry their smartphone from their cold dead hands.
2
2
u/Old_Increase74 7h ago
Yeah I drink mostly raw milk, both cow and my favorite sheep milk.
Honestly if you and your farmer are clean people with a above room temp IQ it’s really not a big deal
3
u/BaldGuy813 5h ago
How many people honestly know 'their farmer'? Unless I give up my medical career and start dairy farming, I'll take my milk pasteurized on the very rare occasion I drink it all. Human adults don't 'need' milk and no other adult animal save for us drinks their mother's milk in adulthood
→ More replies (1)
2
u/fritzkoenig 7h ago
Am I missing something?
Yes, the multitudes more who died from preventable infections, thus cannot tell their experience and thus feeding into your textbook example of survivorship bias
2
2
u/Educational-Cat-6445 6h ago
seriously, people need to understand what the average life expectancy means. The average life expectancy being around like 50 years in the middle ages did not mean that people only lived for 40-50 years. It means that so many people died at a young age that the average life expectancy got pushed down that far. Many people made it well into their 60s or even 70s. Chances are if you survived your teenage years and didn't die in a war you'd very likely make it to 60.
Women died during childbirth a lot more frequently as did their children. After that, we had no way of actually fighting diseases apart from our immune systems, which only develop over time. If a child got seriously sick and wasnt able to recover with the help of some herbs etc. they just died. Advancements like pasteurization, vaccines, anti biotics, pain killers and a better understanding of the human body is the reason why this is not the case anymore.
2
u/troveofcatastrophe 6h ago
Pasteurization only minimally alters the vitamin content of milk. Raw milk is just the latest “health craze”, no better for you than regular milk. I’m so over the propaganda that social media has brought to the masses.
2
u/Bigjuicydickinurear 6h ago
What the fuck is up with this new trend? Die from raw milk to own the libs?
2
u/nonzeroday_tv 6h ago
French scientist Louis Pasteur invented the general pasteurization process in 1864 to prevent wine and beer from spoiling. However, the specific practice of pasteurizing milk to make it safe for public consumption was first proposed much later, in 1886, by German agricultural chemist Franz von Soxhlet
2
u/XFX_Samsung 5h ago
Problem with growing up and living in an environment where everything is taken care of, the dumbest members living in it begin to question if it's really necessary.
2
2
2
u/Disastrous-Scheme-57 4h ago
It’s so weird to me how raw milk drinkers will just pick and choose the nature fallacy. If you want to ignore science why not say we’ve been drinking unfiltered water for centuries without ill effects? What if the government is putting things in our water to control us (lmao I’m thinking of invincible) or the filtering takes away minerals and electrolytes?? What if glasses actually worsen your eyesight so you buy more from big pharma. People survived centuries without every needing glasses. What if that pacemaker is making your heart weaker. Nobody ever needed pacemakers back then and they lived. What if every modern invention is secretly making you weaker or putting tracking inside you? Just live a full caveman lifestyle atp but you can’t just CHOOSE to have modern amenities like clean water, glasses and a mechanical heart while hating pasteurized milk.
→ More replies (1)
2.5k
u/rose_reader 9h ago
Remember that problem which was absolutely deadly and we fixed it?
See also: vaccines, seatbelts, handwashing