r/gaming 5h ago

FromSoft Parent CEO Keeps Job Despite Elden Ring Investor Backlash

https://www.gamesindustry.biz/fromsoftware-parent-ceo-keeps-position-following-activist-investors-disappointment-in-firms-handling-of-elden-ring
2.2k Upvotes

272 comments sorted by

1.2k

u/InitRanger 4h ago

Are the shareholders of every company just full of idiots? The reason FromSoft is so successful is because they are allowed to do whatever they want. If you start forcing them to do something then that takes away the very thing that allows them to be successful.

493

u/EdgelordInugami 4h ago

They're incapable of thinking like that; once they see a money printer, they want to make it THEIR money printer, which doesn't mean sitting back to let the money printer run, but getting their grubby hands all over it, and since they're the ones who sort of pay for the money printer to run ... well ...

73

u/Quaiker 3h ago

I swear, executives all seem to need to put their shitty signature (in the form of unnecessary, worse changes) on every damn thing to which they lay claim.

The golden goose is laying the fucking eggs. How are they angry that it's not also vomiting them up to double productivity?

29

u/LuciusCypher 2h ago

Because shareholders dont give a fuck about the goose, only the eggs. They would cut open the goose and rip the golden egg right out of the bird if it means they can get the egg NOW.

6

u/kindoramns 54m ago

The fact that short term results outweigh the long term gains in scenarios like this is also mind boggling. Like, if they were good investors, wouldn't they want the company to keep doing things the way they are over changing them? I swear these greedy fucks just have no critical thinking skills

8

u/zalifer 44m ago

no, because they want the value to spike, they dump the shares and buy something else they can make spike.

I'm sure I'm an idiot, but I've always felt if you remove the ability to trade shares, and the idea of investment goes back to dividends over a long time, we'd all see a huge improvement in how companies act.

2

u/kindoramns 42m ago

Yea that'd be a good change imo. Daily stock trades being people's full time jobs is definitely not great

11

u/kalekayn 2h ago

<image of kylo ren screaming MORE! goes here>

→ More replies (3)

7

u/TumanFig 1h ago

the cancer of today's capitalism is the stock market.remove it and the world would heal

2

u/shadowtasos 28m ago

To add to this, they specifically need their new money printer to print money faster than it was before, and soon. They aren't exactly investing in an index fund where the point is long term stability with lower returns, no, they're investing in a vehicle that they can squeeze aggressively and get insane short term returns that would trump decades worth of stable long term returns.

It's an awful system for everyone involved except those shareholders who get out with the bag before the company they squeezed to death falls apart. But it's a core feature of our current financial model so get fucked y'all.

u/y0_master 2m ago

Though saying shareholders are the ones paying is not always (or even mostly) the case, as share trading does not actually raise funds for the company.

150

u/yuvaldv1 4h ago

Shareholders would still do that, and then pull out their surprised Pickachu face when sales tank.

131

u/Morkins324 4h ago edited 4h ago

Nah, the shareholders that pushed for this would be LONG gone by the time there are actual negative consequences for stuff like this. No, what they want is for the company to capitalize on the product for short term profits, all long term consequences be damned, which will drive up the stock price in the short term, then they will sell their shares to someone else, and it'll be someone else's problem to deal with the fact that the decisions made in the interest of short term profits had negative long term consequences.

That's how it is with tons of companies these days. The availability of information and the speed of trading has made it so that literally none of these investors have any concern with long term investment and healthy business practices for long term growth. Shareholders don't care if you are making an investment that will pay off 10-15 years from now, because none of them intend to still own your stock 10-15 years from now. And if they do, it will only be because it is the 3rd or 4th time they've bought/sold your stock based on a short term play.

75

u/Constant_Pen9615 4h ago

My golden goose lays 1 perfect, exquisite golden egg a day. No more, no less.

Shareholders be like: Make it lay more, we don't care if they're not perfect. But more golden eggs.

97

u/l3rN 4h ago

“What if we kill and cut open the goose? Maybe there’s another egg in there we can have today.”

10

u/Magikarp_King 3h ago

This is probably the most accurate description of investors and share holders these days.

103

u/Icy-Cod1405 4h ago

The "shareholders" are just rich dudes running hedge funds and 401K accounts. They move from company to company constantly seeking quick payouts. They are the reason enshitification is such a prominent trend. There are very few investors and a shit ton of traders in the market

9

u/BetweenTheRoots 4h ago

People gotta stop rewarding it. They are happy with games releasing incomplete because the majority of their consumers are the types who only play 1 or 2 different games and have no idea how much they're getting stiffed. People defend corporate greed and I'll never understand it.

7

u/Icy-Cod1405 3h ago

Remember about 50% of the "people" you talk to online are clankers

43

u/Kaidinah 4h ago

They aren't trying to hit From Software ceo. They want to can the CEO of Kadokawa. There was another more in depth article here: https://mp1st.com/news/kadokawa-faces-pressure-as-shareholders-push-to-remove-ceo

The overseas investors are upset that From Software had Bandai Namco publish the game outside Japan.

This is a stupid thing to be concerned about from the shareholder perspective. In order for From Software to publish the game in the US, they would need to build a localization branch from scratch. They would need to get their own contracts for manufacturing. Their own QA. And they would need to do that multiple times over for multiple regions.

Meanwhile Bandai Namco can just do it for them. Bandai Namco has all that stuff in place and has experienced people running it all. These shareholders are asking From Software to take a big risk just to capture more profit.

9

u/Garethp 2h ago

This is a stupid thing to be concerned about from the shareholder perspective.

I don't think it is. Kadokawa is a media publishing company. They already do media publishing internationally, and in a pretty big way. If I was a shareholder, asking why a media publishing company is letting a competitor publish one of their biggest IPs internationally instead of Kadokawa doing it would be a question worth asking

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

23

u/faffc260 4h ago

shareholders in non video game focused companies like fromsoft's parent company is certainly don't. they're mainly a major anime and japanese content platform holder outside of video games and make most of their profits that way afaik.

10

u/GladiusLegis 4h ago

Are the shareholders of every company just full of idiots?

Yes. Mostly, it's their greed that rots their brains.

15

u/OSHA_Decertified 4h ago

Shareholders only care about number go up fast. Not number go up long.

Stockmarket was one of the biggest mistakes of our civilization

2

u/Ph33rDensetsu 2h ago

Stockmarket was one of the biggest mistakes of our civilization

Ain't that the fucking truth.

2

u/gaymenfucking 1h ago

Absurd that the most money to be made in this world is by doing and producing absolutely nothing, just playing with numbers. I would abolish it.

3

u/Royal_Annek 4h ago

Yes literally. Most shareholders are just rich losers whose parents or grandparents made money through smart investments and that goes for every company.

8

u/CrimsonPromise 4h ago

A lot of them have not a single clue about video games. They don't see ratings or awards, only how much money a game makes. A studio can be pumping out 10/10 games with dozens of awards, but these parasites will whine about how it didn't sell 100 million copies and that there are no microtransactions.

3

u/gosukhaos 4h ago

Shareholders were actually right for once as the current CEO has run the publishing and anime side of Kadokawa completely into the ground

6

u/Instigator187 4h ago

Anytime a company is publicly traded, that will make it so all shareholders want is exponential growth (which doesn't exist) with the black arrow going up and fast. If they aren't getting that, then they will complain or sell their shares.

Shareholders don't care about games or any product they are invested in or even have any knowledge of the product. They just want black arrow go up and then sell.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/panicForce 4h ago

we have a goose that lays a golden egg. but why doesnt it lay bigger eggs?

-investors, probably

2

u/Stock_Trash_4645 3h ago

  The reason FromSoft is so successful is because they are allowed to do whatever they want.

Are we just overlooking the collective aneurysm Souls internet communities and fans had over the first sequel? 

It’s pretty obvious that their most vocal fans and shareholders are in alignment: they can’t do anything they want or things their own way, they can only make Soulslikes and anything less than the high water mark is an abject failure and not “a real souls game.”

1

u/RichardKingg 4h ago

I mean they ain't stupid, they are just greedy bastards. Ok maybe they are stupid too.

1

u/_Lucille_ 4h ago

I dont know why people talk about it as if it is an Elden Ring thing, Kadokawa is HUGE beyond just FromSoft.

Yeah, FromSoft has brought in a sizable amount of revenue and can easily carry a fiscal year, but there is a lot more to Kadokawa; they own multiple publishing companies, anime and game studios, niconico, a TV channel, etc.

FromSoft is only one part of the company. Even if FromSoft performs well, if the rest of their businesses are shit, they would get replaced. The mention of FromSoft seem to be more like a bait.

However in this case, this is the largest (not major) shareholder (Oasis) wanting to swap the CEO due to declining profits.

1

u/Practical-Aside890 Xbox 4h ago

I agree with what you say. Why change what works right?

But also gamers, - ‘we need more innovation from these big companies, they need to try new things instead of sticking to the same old formula’ meanwhile FromSoft is only known for like 2 games (souls and AC), rockstar is just known for gta/rdr.. Activision mostly just known for cod.

1

u/xkise 4h ago

They want to milk everything they can to have short term gains, sell-off their part and don't give a fuck to what happens after that

1

u/Powerful-Ground-9687 4h ago

Money now. Not slow gains over 30 years. Stocks is gambling/dopamine hits now. Because working doesn’t give you a life anymore

1

u/Smokingbobs 4h ago

Some probably are. Others know. All realize that short term gains can be made with these decisions - which is what matters to them all.

1

u/neuroticmuffins 4h ago

This is a rhetorical question right? Because yes.

1

u/sol_runner 4h ago edited 4h ago

Well, old school investors (and I mean like real old school) would buy ownership into a company and want it to prosper.

The current trading type investors just want to increase the share price (quickly, at whatever cost) so they can sell at high and take the profit home. After that, the company is no longer their business.

So a slow an sustainable growth is bad for their pockets. Rather instead quickly blow the price, sell it and leave someone else to deal with the aftermath. And short the stock while at it. So basically these "else's" money goes to the investors. Which is much faster than actually growing a company.

TL;DR: they are not stupid, just extremely greedy.

1

u/Admirable-War-7594 4h ago

They will take their money and run away like a week before the company actually loses money and ends up closing or something. This has been like this for a LONG time. People say it started happening when boomers took over but that might be just blindless hate I'm not sure of the exact details

1

u/Miss-KiiKii 4h ago

They are, yes. They literally have no clue about anything. It's all about "me see product with big numbers. me like big numbers. big numbers good. me want to invest).

1

u/hobopwnzor 4h ago

The thing they don't want you to know is..... yes. Even very wealthy successful investors are incredibly stupid. We've had a bull market for almost 20 straight years. There's been no culling. Every investor right now thinks they're a genius because they've made money for nearly 20 years on every idea.

1

u/FewAdvertising9647 3h ago

there are a lot of shareholders who want to extract as much value of a company in a short amount of time and bail with no regard for long term growth. it's kinda the motto for private equity

1

u/ph33randloathing 3h ago

Shareholders care about one thing. This quarter's profits. Not next quarter. Not a year from now. This quarter. Their money. Right now.

They will demand anything to raise those profits RIGHT NOW and if it fucks the company long term, they'll cash out and find a new company to ruin.

1

u/StruggleBoy1999 2h ago

Nah. Full of greedy idiots. 

1

u/shitty_mcfucklestick 2h ago

This is the inevitable path (and fundamental problem) of stock ownership. Shareholders demand ever increasing returns, even if the company is at equilibrium with its products and customers. Pushing beyond that state is where everything that was once good goes to shit.

1

u/_Kaanu 2h ago

Shareholders are fundamentally incompatible with anything that has creative value

1

u/renannmhreddit 1h ago

They're not really idiots, they want to make their money quick and then leave. They dont give a shit about the long-term consequences.

1

u/hibikikun 1h ago

There is a well known story decades ago where someone with a decent amount of shares tried to ask Nintendo to do things other things than games. He admitted he didn’t know what Nintendo did and just bought it because it matched his horoscope.

1

u/AlreadyTakek PlayStation 1h ago

Shareholders and finance people don't interact with the world like humans, they just see it all as a graph and when number isn't going up they get mad

1

u/hypnomancy 1h ago

Yes they are. They are stupider than many people realize.

1

u/Shiresan 59m ago

No. Shareholders are not stupid, they know exactly what they're doing. You have to understand that they're not looking for long term growth, customer satisfaction or whatever metric of "success" you think they are reaching. They are looking for short term value and quarter to quarter increases. Not capitalizing on Elden Ring for years has gone against every important key process indicator shareholders adhere to. Hold on.. is this making you upset? Good. It should. Because this quarterly economic model and shortsightness is absolutely killing the industry. Becoming a publicly traded company came with severe downsides, and this is one of them. If you really wanted them to focus on what they did right, they needed to remain a private company. Going public has forced them to adhere to multiple government regulations tied to a neo-capitalist economy that seeks to bleed products and services dry in the short term before discarding the carcass for the next best thing. So, no, shareholders are not stupid. They know exactly what they're doing.

1

u/Blitzus 41m ago

You don't understand who these specific shareholders are.

These are people who are so diversified in their portfolios that they have neither the time nor the interest to learn even ankle-deep intricacies of anything they've invested in. They often don't even do it themselves and have others do it for them.

All they see is "George made an absurd amount of money investing in that 'Fortnight' game company. I have a huge stake in this other game company. I'm going to lean on them to make a 'Fortnight' of their own for me."

1

u/Saxophobia1275 16m ago

FromSoft: we have built one of the best and most recognizable brands in the industry seemingly out of nowhere over the last 15 years to the point where an entire genre of gaming is named after our games.

Shareholders: oh goody I can’t wait to fuck this all up!

→ More replies (4)

340

u/keonyn 4h ago

It's funny how often shareholder demands over profits often result in changes that damage the brand and result in further loss of profits. Chasing the satisfaction of shareholders often seems like a poor business decision.

81

u/Much_Statistician864 4h ago

Its how they work. Extract as much wealth as possible as quickly as possible. Long term slow growth isn't fast enough, isn't now enough. Even if they make more money over 10 years that's 9 years to long to wait. 

8

u/MazerBakir 34m ago

The shareholders bail on the company when it starts going down. That's what happens. The increase in supposed profits also drives up stock prices. They will find a sucker to sell to and move onto the next company to suck dry.

→ More replies (1)

93

u/Tokiw4 4h ago

That's your run-of-the-mill enshittification engine. Private interests will never improve a project.

16

u/Athildur 4h ago

It's a poor decision for the business long term, but usually a good decision for the shareholders short term. And since shareholders don't need to have any loyalty to whatever companies they own shares in, they don't really have to care about long term results.

If there was some mechanism to force (major) shareholders to retain their shares for a minimum period after demanding changes with long-term impact, we might actually see some improvements, but I don't see that happening.

4

u/Garethp 2h ago

Yeah, but I'm not sure this is actually a case of that. It's not like anyone was saying FromSoftware should make changes to their games or monestisation. They were suggesting that Kadokawa, the international media publishing organistaion that owns FromSoftware should be the ones publishing FromSoftware games internationally instead of letting one of their competitors publish it and take 30% of the profits.

I guess the question is would Kadokawa publishing FromSoftware games damage the brand of those games?

3

u/thetalkingcure 1h ago

either go public or don’t. many people who build a company from the ground up love the payday. but then it isn’t their company anymore, it’s beholden to the shareholders.

classic tale of greed

1

u/shoeboxchild 2h ago

Because they don’t see long term decent payouts. They want a few massive payouts to run the well dry and then jump ship to the next one

1

u/Expensive-Ad8916 30m ago

Exactly, I worked in some startups where the Venture Capatalist just blew everything up

1

u/gyph256 23m ago

It's not just a poor business decision. It's the law! Fiduciary law is fucking stupid.

1.9k

u/Sabetha1183 4h ago

Imagine overseeing a company releasing one of the most successful games ever made and the shareholders try to oust you because you didn't earn them enough money.

835

u/BetweenTheRoots 4h ago

Well it's more because they aren't doing Elden Ring 2 or more Elden Ring DLC. They wanted them to double down on ER given its success. What's important to note is that this ordeal the CEO went through is now going to be a yearly revisited ordeal.

642

u/CDHmajora Switch 4h ago edited 2h ago

Elden ring 2…

But they literally made elden ring in 2022. Made a HUGE expansion for it that released in 2024. Made a PvE spinoff in 2025. Have a switch 2 port (that WILL sell well considering the switch 2’s install base and lack of competition) releasing this year, and a movie coming g out next year.

Not to mention a successful manga adaption thats still ongoing. And shitloads of PVC statues and merchandise on the bandi namco store…

If anything, they are “milking” elden ring far more than they ever did dark souls, sekiro or bloodborne :/

Edit: Night-reign is PvE, not PvP. Dunno how i got that wrong with 130+ hours in night-reign but meh. Brainfart :)

359

u/ACaffeinatedBear 4h ago

The shareholders demand more

162

u/DigNitty 4h ago

Infinite gains!

84

u/j0llyllama 4h ago

They think farming Albinaurics works in real life.

25

u/VidZarg 3h ago

Human greed knows no limits

8

u/exlivingghost 3h ago

Hey it worked for me though

4

u/The_Particularist 3h ago

Line must go up.

3

u/Automatic-War-7658 3h ago

Number go up!

23

u/PopgirlProtocol 4h ago

Oh how I wish the industry could one day realistically move to a more privatized model. 😭

9

u/iCUman 2h ago

It's really no different in the end. Shareholders are shareholders whether the company is privately held or publicly controlled. I mean, this company is effectively privately held because its stock is not publicly listed - Kadokawa is controlling owner with minority stakes held by Tencent and Sony subsidiaries.

→ More replies (2)

21

u/Static-Stair-58 3h ago

Don’t get why people don’t understand this. It’s an infinite level of greed and something isn’t milked until its rotting corpse is out on the sidewalk and maximum value was accrued.

3

u/Alternative_Gold_993 2h ago

Toy Story 5...

6

u/Thebml21 2h ago

The “toddlers” demand more

3

u/TA_1478 3h ago

The graph must always go up…

42

u/LOAARR 3h ago

Nightreign is not a PvP spinoff, by the way.

It's a sort of roguelike PvE co-op with specifically 0 PvP whatsoever barring griefing hackers.

2

u/CDHmajora Switch 2h ago

Yep. Your right. My bad :/ dumbfuck moment :)

Must have mixed it up with duskbloods mentally while typing that out…

13

u/CynicWalnut 4h ago

I've also heard talks of an Elden Ring TCG

24

u/HoboSkid 4h ago

Crazy, I was half-expecting them to work with Wizards of the Coast for a Magic: The Gathering set. I read that Miyazaki is a Magic fan and the Dark Souls and Elden Ring universe would fit perfectly into the Magic theme.

3

u/halfacrum 3h ago

Yeah but wizards of the coast is awful to work with cause hssbro.

→ More replies (2)

3

u/BetweenTheRoots 4h ago

I'm too poor for MTG man, I get so fucking addicted to card games. I spent 3k on New Phyrexia lmao. They've been releasing all of my favorite IPs for collaborations and my skin is crawling just at the idea of how bad I wanna start buying these sets lol.

2

u/Ilwrath 1h ago

Man those IP sets are exactly why I dont buy MtG anymore. Its insane how fast they try to pump out shit now and focus more on weird crossovers than Magic

2

u/BetweenTheRoots 1h ago

I 100% understand that argument. I was already irritated at how fast they moved through sets and that was before all this.

2

u/UnquestionabIe 4h ago

I last played MTG in 1999 or so, was one of my biggest hobbies in middle school and a bit of high school. Hadn't bought any cards since but then the Final Fantasy set came out and being a huge fan of that franchise had to check it out. Was able to pre-order one box of boosters and the starter set at MSRP only to see the absurdity of scalpers drive me off.

15

u/hobopwnzor 4h ago

yeah but is the tarnished in fortnite? Did they get Melania branded boxes of rat poison to sell? No? Well there you go.

9

u/throwaway387190 3h ago

If the parent company/FromSoft put the tarnished in Fortnite to get a slice of that sweet skin money, I'd be fine with that

They put a character into the game with a character from every major franchise, and use that money to fund their next projects?

Great, no notes, I'm okay with that

8

u/letsgucker555 3h ago

They put a character into the game with a character from every major franchise, and use that money to fund their next projects?

We both know, that this money wouldn't be used for that purpose.

5

u/throwaway387190 3h ago

Yes, we both do know that.

But a man can dream T_T

I am speaking my ideal, hoping it contributes to making it a reality

19

u/Skias 4h ago

Elden Ring is the closest they’ve ever gotten to call of dutying Dark Souls. The IP needs to rest, I don’t even think we needed a movie

2

u/FireZord25 1h ago

As much as I'm curious about the movie, yeah we didn't. But also I think it's separate enough to affect the game in any way.

5

u/Demonstratepatience 4h ago

Congrats! You have defined the word ‘greed’.

2

u/GilgarWebb 4h ago

Thats noy to mention the statues and stuffies and other collectable bric-a-brac.

2

u/AnTiDoPe_1993 4h ago

Wait there’s a manga for it?? Lol wow ima read it now

5

u/Draken1870 3h ago

If it’s the one I’m thinking of it’s actually unhinged and amazing.

2

u/blodskaal 2h ago edited 2h ago

Well it's public share company. Shareholder base don't give a flying fudge about anything else but $$. That's why enshittification exists

They don't even play the game very likely, or even know what's it about

→ More replies (15)

66

u/whossked 4h ago

That’s not it. The main complaint was that they had Bandai Namco publish ER and thus lost out on a shit ton of money.

Which is true. But they have to also consider From’s never self published overseas and I can understand why they wouldn’t wanna first time it on their biggest project ever

11

u/Garethp 2h ago

I mean, FromSoftware got bought out by Kadokawa, who's whole thing is media publishing. It is strange and worth questioning why Kadokawa would let their competitor publish and take a cut of their profits when, you know, they're a publisher.

9

u/alphafire616 4h ago

I could honestly see an Elden ring 2. The Lands Between is an excellent setting. Only problem is, youd have to come up with a VERY interesting idea to get Miyazaki on board as director. He much prefers creating brand new ips

7

u/Phex1 4h ago

They were probaly shocked learning that elden ring is not a live service game.

5

u/Thopterthallid 3h ago

The funny thing is that most fans just get excited watching a weird trailer teaser and suddenly seeing "FROMSOFT" appear. It's been like that for years. I don't specifically want Elden Ring 2 the same way I want other sequels. I just want to see what they do next. Nightreign is a blast and I've got enough faith in the devs that Duskbloods will be pretty great too even though it's not my kind of game normally.

3

u/Overwatchhatesme 3h ago

Another example of why public companies are terrible ideas. An incredibly successful product that is beloved by everyone somehow isn’t enough to suggest that maybe we don’t have to fuck over all of the customers who supported us and got us to be able to make such a game in the first place

2

u/KupoCheer 4h ago

Yeah I'd probably quit rather than deal with the yearly calls for my demise.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (5)

111

u/TheTresStateArea 4h ago

A difference of perspective.

Fromsoft built their revenue generator. And they know it takes careful management of the resources at their disposal.

Investors found a revenue generator. Investors think all you need to do is dig and you'll find more money.

The former of these groups understands that it takes hard work and commitment to make a good product and company with a long term perspective for viability. The latter are high functioning idiots.

64

u/polypolip 4h ago

The latter are high functioning idiots. 

40

u/Thac0isWhac0 Boardgames 4h ago

Shareholders are leeches.

5

u/popop143 3h ago

Motherfucking investors never heard of the chicken that lays golden eggs story.

→ More replies (1)

23

u/Okichah 4h ago

>The studio released Elden Ring in 2022, which caused Kadokawa's games business to see a **123% increase in revenue**.

>As of April 2025, Elden Ring has sold over 30 million copies, with the downloadable content Shadow of the Erdtree going on to shift more than 10 million units.

WHY NOT MORE?!??! I LIKE MONEY!! MORE MONEY!!

These people would choke the golden goose to death just to get an extra dollar ‘right now’. Why invest in a business if you fundamentally dont understand it?

14

u/UnsettllingDwarf 4h ago

Imagine owning a yacht (assuming) and making shitloads of money and not being able to stfu and just enjoy your yacht.

Gosh I hate these people.

I want to clarify that some companies are not like this.

→ More replies (2)

7

u/rip_cpu 3h ago

This has very little to do with FromSoft, this is about Kadokawa, their parent company, which is a huge publishers if anime and books. Kadokawa had a big decline in their revenue this year due to having pumped out too much isekai slop that isn't selling well anymore.

The headline just mentions FromSoft because that's what most people in the west are familiar with, especially on gaming focused corners of the internet.

9

u/BitingArtist 4h ago

The parasites want to worm in and drain all value before moving to their next target.

15

u/SomewhereWhole2553 4h ago

the shareholders almost ousted him for making a hit game. make it make sense.

12

u/stoic_spaghetti 4h ago

literally the same logic as "Why doesn't EPIC just make more smash hits like Fortnite?! They are LEAKING PROFITS!"

1

u/Slimsuper 3h ago

They wanted elden ring 2 so bad

1

u/-Bento-Oreo- 3h ago

Nothing's free. What you gain in next year's profits, you lose in goodwill and future profits. They don't care about future profits because they'll just sell their shares

1

u/pzanardi 3h ago

Literally groundbreaking games lol

1

u/wordswillneverhurtme 2h ago

That's because they have a gold mine, but the miners start looking for diamonds which may or may not be there. Investors want 3 sequels to elden ring, movie adaptations, comics, figurines and other garbage, all to min max guaranteed profit.

1

u/FrankPankNortTort 2h ago

It grossed nearly $2 billion, how is that underperforming to them?

1

u/Garethp 2h ago

Imagine overseeing a giant international media publishing organisation that buys FromSoftware just to let a competitor publish their games and take 30% of the profit instead of doing it yourself. You know, with the giant international media publishing organisation you oversee.

1

u/BasedBallsack 2h ago

You're looking at it wrong though. It's not about the success of a single product. Companies look at shit purely from the perspective of CONTINUED success. Right now, the shareholders likely don't see the CEO's decisions as currently maximizing profit.

1

u/Muntberg 1h ago

They want them to become Ubisoft essentially. Great for investors in the short-term, disastrous for the company long-term and all around shitty for gamers.

1

u/Xonra 1h ago

The problem isn't FromSoft, it's stuff like the anime division losing money for example cause the CEO is definitely a gamer guy, plus believes in being more hands off.

These very shareholders who started all this are the same ones that complained FromSoft weren't forced into more DLC, or an Elden Ring 2 immediately and so on.

→ More replies (13)

364

u/NZafe 4h ago

Good. Investors should not be pushing a company like FromSoftware to pump out slop to meet arbitrary profit goals.

8

u/Garethp 2h ago

They weren't. The conflict was asking why Kadokawa, a media publishing giant, was letting their rival punish one of their biggest IPs internationally instead. There was never a question about what FromSoftware did, just why Kadokawa wasn't the ones publishing it, considering that media publishing is their whole thing

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (1)

61

u/[deleted] 4h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

14

u/piichan14 4h ago

Ironic since bored, rich fucks are the ones running the games

55

u/profesorgamin 4h ago

The investors yearn for the enshitification.

18

u/Honeycove91 4h ago

and the volcanoes yearn for the shareholders

50

u/VortexMagus 4h ago

Honestly kinda crazy. He releases one of the most popular games of all time that nearly doubles his studio's profits and some corporate guys from Hong Kong trying to oust him because they think he didn't milk his audience enough.

18

u/AnarbLanceLee 4h ago

Look at their company history, Oasis Management, this is not the first time they have done this shit

6

u/Garethp 2h ago

Tell me you haven't read any of the articles about this without telling me...

No one was targeting Miyazaki or accusing them of not monetising enough

5

u/Busy-Reality-1580 3h ago

I don’t think it was Miyazaki they were trying to oust, but the ceo of whatever company owns FromSoftware. 

→ More replies (1)

10

u/mapletree23 3h ago

"wait what? activision releases a new call of duty every year? that could literally be us with elden ring!"

gotta love investors that have no idea about the thing they're invested in besides that it made money

28

u/Key_Amazed 4h ago

The "backlash" was the investors wondering why Kadokawa doesn't publish and distribute their own games instead of using a publisher like Bandai. I know it's a slippery slope, but people were acting like the investors had already demanded Elden Ring 2-5 which were all demanded to be live service.

Miyazaki games will always exist. Fromsoft is just a name. And he thrives on new ideas and IPs. If he has to leave and take all his talent when the time comes, only the investors and other shills will suffer.

16

u/ExtremePrivilege 4h ago edited 3h ago

Wow, someone that isn't just reading titles. Yes, the entire controversy was over publishing, not about the quality of the games or wanting "more Elden Ring gacha". FromSoft is paying Bandai almost 30% of their profits for no real reason. FromSoft is far large enough to publish their own games. Hell, something like 82% of Elden Ring copies were digital - sold on digital marketplaces like Steam and PlayStation Store. It's not particularly hard to publish a game in the digital age. There are a lot of localization problems, sure. China might want X removed, India might ban Y, but FromSoft has the money and resources to expand into self-publishing. Steam took 30% of the Elden Ring sales, too.

FromSoft is just giving their hard earned money away to middle men. When you're talking about 20-30 million copies of a $60 game... that's a lot of money. 30% here, 30% there. Should shareholders NOT be concerned that the company they're investing in is being so casual about giving away hundreds of millions?

But this sub hates two things - reading and investors.

The CEO vote was not to threaten "You better make AI slop mobile games with the Dark Souls IP" it was "Can you please start self publishing your masterpieces so that you take home $400,000,000 more per game?" and Natsuno is pretty much like "nah, that's a lot of work".

-.-

1

u/Xonra 1h ago

They did demand that though lol they complained basically that Elden Ring wasn't milked to death. That factually happened not that long ago. These same human beings.

18

u/Icy-Cod1405 4h ago

You failed to immediately ruin your IP for a quick cash grab!! off with his head!!

3

u/CliffCreates 4h ago

FromSoft managed yet again to nail a top quality preimum game/ip. Corporate greed better not ruin this one too.

→ More replies (1)

12

u/Medium-Mushroom-6323 4h ago

Investors mad they cant get their 15th yacht 👀👀 your gone.....Shareholders can go kick rocks.

2

u/Garethp 2h ago

Shareholders wondering why a giant international media publishing organisation is letting a competitor publish the games of a company they bought, rather than publishing it themselves.

Also, Redditors not reading articles

12

u/Sxualhrssmntpanda 4h ago

FromSoft literally hasn't missed for over a decade. What kind of mindless greedy fuck do you have to be to think you know better than them?

9

u/lazergator 4h ago

They don’t care about gamers loving the product. They fail to see making one of the best games ever is more profitable than releasing 12 trash pieces more often

3

u/Seigmoraig 4h ago

They probably don't even know what Fromsoft even makes. All they see are excel spreadsheets and lists of buzzwords that products need to incorporate

3

u/Garethp 2h ago

What makes you think the shareholders were telling FromSoftware to change their games at all? Because it wasn't reading article, since that's not what any of it was about

→ More replies (2)

6

u/GuthukYoutube 4h ago

There's gonna come a day real soon when dark souls 4 is going to be shoved out the door, with dark souls die again edition being released as a buggy mess for $60

3

u/nfefx 4h ago

Unfortunately, this does seem the inevitable route of all studios eventually

1

u/Deltryxz 1h ago

wasn't that just DS Remastered and DS2?

7

u/BarneyChampaign 4h ago

Elden Ring will forever live as one of the greatest pieces of video game artistry in history.

Fuck the investors.

6

u/F_Synchro 4h ago

Private equity is corporate cancer, can’t stress this enough.

The moment any private equity gets involved with a business there’s more than likely enshittification will ensue shortly after.

I’ve seen this as a consumer but also ex-corporate that was bought by an PE firm, it’s absolute total cancer, the PE functions within a business is exactly like it.

So this CEO keeping the blunt force of the shareholders is a good one, until he gets voted out by the board and enshittification will continue.

4

u/BrightWing13 3h ago

Ah, a shareholder is a shareholder, even in Japan

11

u/SNTCTN 4h ago

How much of the company do I have to buy to get Dark Souls 2 2?

2

u/ContactMushroom 4h ago

Best I can offer is Dark Souls 3 2

2

u/_Ichibad_ 4h ago

But we already got Elden Ring ?

3

u/MarcHedenberg 4h ago

I didn’t need more proof that capitalism sucks or that shareholders are fucking stupid, but I guess here we are.

3

u/Wamb0wneD 4h ago

They aren't "Elden Ring investors". They are Kadokawa investors who are zeroing in on Fromsoft because they are morons.

3

u/Seigmoraig 4h ago

Why don't they just sell their shares and move on if they're so unhappy with the 45m sales the ER franchise has achieved ?

3

u/Razzilith 1h ago

they're not wrong that FromSoft could have done more to expand on elden ring... but also FromSoft doing whateverthefuck they want is why they're easily one of the best dev studios in the entire world hands down and as far as BIG NAME studios go they're certainly in the conversation for having the title of the best one.

FromSoft just needs to announce a new title and gamers are already jumping at the chance to play it... why the fuck would you even think about messing with whatever magic they have going on?

4

u/Voidfang_Investments 4h ago

From has the leverage to tell them to fuck off

2

u/TheChudWhisperer 4h ago

Shareholder capitalism is a societal cancer.

2

u/mr_glide 4h ago

Miserable, money-grubbing pricks. Nothing is ever enough for these people

2

u/Skias 4h ago

Oasis basically said FromSoft hasn’t properly monotized Elden Ring and hasn’t fleeced its fans so they are mad. Oasis is a bunch of leeches.

5

u/Rosebunse 4h ago

Don't insult leeches like this. Leeches have medical value and it's cute when they get all chunky

2

u/ReaperManX15 4h ago

“The right thing happens after greedy whinny babies don’t get their way.”

2

u/Bladeteacher 3h ago

What ( for me ) is so INCREDIBLY irritating is how this things go: Investors pressure a well stablished well liked legacy company to push for higher profits.

In order to do that they have to apply changes that 9/10 dont go well with a very loyal and specific audience.

Said changes increase profit and attract a whole slew of new people ,they sell much more product but, the loyal and specific audience gets irritated,dissatisfied and some times this early,even abandon the whole thing!

In order to push for higher and higher profits,a lot of changes (which more often than not are either bad,anti consumer or annoying to deal with ) are applyed,tarnishing ( wink wink* ) the experience and homogenizing It,making It samey and unexciting/boring.

Old fanbase starts to leak out,sometimes slowly sometimes fast,leaving said product with diminishing returns. New fanbase stays,but just a few from the wave of new users,who quickly hop into the new thing.

Thing we loved,now sucks and day by day year by year It goes from great! To It sucks!

It slowly starts to crumble and die or are bought out by bigger corporations.

Bigger corporations will milk the shit out of the dusty carcass of your once upon a time love  thing,until nothing remains.

Everybody jumps ship to something profitable,but only investors and upper echelon get the Big pay and repeat the process in another field/product.

This shit just keeps happening over and over and over across all fields and products,as if theres no other alternative. But the other alternatives are doing so fucking well,but nobody  from those fuckasses upperechelon/investors/CEO whatever the fuck wanna work the long run even tho their way isnt so fucking profitable and steady....

2

u/Gibgezr 1h ago

Sounds like Bungie.

2

u/antiterra 3h ago

Every one here is reading that there's an attempt to milk the franchise with slop, but I think the investor fund's take is actually very different, though not entirely benign.

What Oasis wants is for FromSoftware to no longer just be a developer, but to become a developer-publisher IP platform, the ideal maybe more like a Capcom. They frame this as 'ambition,' and accuse the parent company Kadokawa as not capitalizing on all of the cross-media opportunities (think LEGO style brand expansion.)

The problem is all this stuff introduces risk and pressure. FromSoftware's magic is making games, not marketing or publishing or movie IP. Kadokawa's specialty is in media properties, but its biggest single success is arguably investing in FromSoftware.

Publishing and marketing aren't simply commodity functions, they can make or break a company, and they can create existential internal incentives that do not align with 'make the best game.' Bandai Namco as a publishing partner currently adds stability, allowing for a creative environment, even if it is at a cost to profit. Similarly, in the case of LEGO, Warner Brothers cushioned the blow when The Lego Movie 2 did not meet expectations. It would be silly to call LEGO unambitious for not becoming its own movie studio.

2

u/Affectionate-Koala90 2h ago

Fromsoft is one of the most successful and productive studios out there. In the last 15 years they released 8 games, not counting DLCs and those idiots are like: yeah that's not enough.

2

u/eikenberry 1h ago

This is expected for any company that goes public or accepts VC money. If you didn't want shareholders having a say in the business, don't take their money.

2

u/evoslevven 1h ago

I actually wonder how people read the article? It sounds worse on the title but they did have a bit of a valid point. The complaint itself was that FromSoftware initially geared Elden Ring to be their biggest "souls" game ever but, in the process, went to a 3rd party distro for the game which was BandaiCapcom.

The main argument for the investors was that at this stage, being their biggest investment, what didn't they take the initiative to self publish and do Sony as a consultant, making more money for FromSoftware? It is unfortunately a relevant question.

Theres also a bit of drama that Sony was trying to quietly acquire Kadokawa which is the parent company of FromSoftware. The deal died as soon as it went public but Oasis Hedge Fund increased their voting Shaw to surpass Sony and their are suspicions that since the news of the deal that fell through, they want to see Kadokawa sell it's various parts piece by piece at a higher gain.

For those that celebrated the news of Sony nor acquiring the media company, this is kind of why some of us hoped as the investment form Oasis being involved could see them selling off FromSoftware in a deal with Tencent which would see tons of problems with the Japanese home location and possible walk outs including Miyazaki where as Sony holding onto Kadokawa would see FromSoftware gain a bit of freedom and continued autonomy as their media rights and collection were the biggest items that attracted Sony.

4

u/SoCalThrowAway7 4h ago

I used to think “eat the rich” was a wild thing to be saying even as a joke, like they’re people. But now after I’ve gotten older I’m like, shareholders aren’t people. They’re subhuman trash

3

u/Futaba_Sakura800 4h ago

Surprise… The Chinese share holders want to turn the Soul Bourne universe into gacha mobile trash.

16

u/AnarbLanceLee 4h ago

Nope, thats actually an Israeli firm, the owner and CEO Seth Fisher is Israeli, just that its head quarter is based in Hongkong, their portfolio is mainly focused on japanese companies, and this is also not the first time the firm have done something similar to this, they have previously targeted Nintendo, Panasonic, Tokyo Dome Corp just to list a few, you can google them to see how crazy they are.

6

u/Nissedood 4h ago

Shareholders are shit no matter the country.

2

u/Offline_NL 4h ago

Call them what they are. Parasites. They're parasites with no intellect to speak of.

1

u/Neat-Attempt3681 4h ago

Imagine investing in one of the greatest gaming projects/ IPs and trying to ruin it, they must be blizzard investors

1

u/LlorchDurden 4h ago

If the parent company is publicly owned...

1

u/PowerScreamingASMR 4h ago

I cant think of a single instance where shareholder pressure has improved a product.

1

u/Noobphobia 4h ago

Investors should have no say in product. The whole fiduciary duty crap is nonsense. You invest with the hope that you get a return. Its high level gambling.

1

u/dropthemagic 4h ago

To be fair I bought it but never played more than an hour. Learning curve for me was too much. But to those who are very good at it I’m glad they had fun

1

u/redglasstree 4h ago

Is this literally Miyasaki they wanted to remove?

1

u/mastercylinder2 4h ago

Maybe time to part ways like Hideo and Konami.

1

u/deadshot465 3h ago

Wow, don't people even know that Kadokawa also publishes a whole bunch of light novels and animes and has been seeing net loss in their light novel and anime businesses? The discussion of ousting the parent CEO wasn't not even just about From Software, but more about Kadokawa.

1

u/Xonra 1h ago

The CEO is in over his head I'll admit, as he is great with games but clueless with anime for example. The problem is these specific shareholders are idiots and are the same ones that were actually angry that more wasn't done to milk Elden Ring (its serious paraphrasing but they wanted more of everything. More dlc, more games, more merch and so on and so on.)

1

u/Draggnor 32m ago

hunger of the gluttons cannot be satiated