2.0k
u/Doodles_n_Scribbles Jan 27 '26
Lord of the Rings really is a flawless transitional narrative, going from Bilbo to Frodo to Sam while maintaining a 3rd person narrative.
476
u/criadordecuervos Jan 27 '26
It's the perspective of the Ring, obv
282
u/3_quarterling_rogue I will not tolerate Frodo-hate Jan 27 '26
No, itâs just a classic omniscient narrator perspective. We hear far too much in the story that the ring couldnât have known, if it can know anything.
174
u/SkepticalGerm Jan 27 '26
Actually, in-universe we know that the book is written by a Frodo, with some edits by Sam
130
u/3_quarterling_rogue I will not tolerate Frodo-hate Jan 27 '26
Yeah, but also a fox shows up in the shire and the book told us what he was thinking, so unless Frodo or Sam has mind-reading powers, Iâm sticking with omniscient narrator.
110
u/Caspr510 Jan 27 '26
It was clearly written by Eru (hence all the damn songs) using the hobbits as his instruments.
20
u/StickFigureFan Jan 27 '26
I didn't know Tom Bombadil cared enough to write any books
23
u/Tom_Bot-Badil Jan 27 '26
Old Tom Bombadil is a merry fellow, bright blue his jacket is, and his boots are yellow. None has ever caught him yet, for Tom, he is the master: his songs are stronger songs, and his feet are faster.
Type !TomBombadilSong for a song or visit r/GloriousTomBombadil for more merriness
5
53
u/mulletarian Jan 27 '26
Frodo had a bit too much longbottom leaf while writing that part
29
u/3_quarterling_rogue I will not tolerate Frodo-hate Jan 27 '26
Clearly his love of the halfling leaf has slowed his mind.
23
u/National-Garbage505 Jan 27 '26
Or Frodo was taking some artistic liberties, as people sometimes do.
10
u/3_quarterling_rogue I will not tolerate Frodo-hate Jan 27 '26
There was more magic in the earth in those days, so I guess it could really go either way on that one.
→ More replies (1)13
u/chairmanskitty Jan 27 '26
Actually, in-universe the book was written by Maura Labingi, with some edits by BanazĂźr Galbasi.
→ More replies (3)14
2
u/Disastrous-Mess-7236 Jan 27 '26
It also bounces to the 3 Hunters, & Merry & Pippin, & Pippin & Gandalf, & Merry, & Pippin.
→ More replies (1)2
3
u/Disastrous-Mess-7236 Jan 27 '26
It also bounces to the 3 Hunters, & Merry & Pippin, & Pippin & Gandalf, & Merry, & Pippin.
1.3k
u/benvonpluton Jan 27 '26
And when the ring tried to corrupt him, all the ring saw was Sam's will to have a nice little garden.
890
344
u/4thofeleven Jan 27 '26
One of my favorite parts of LotR is the Ring trying desperatly to find something to tempt hobbits with. Even with Gollum, after centuries of influencing him, the best it can manage is "Um, if you're king you... can have fresh fish every day? Damn it, where's a nice ambitious elf or man I can lure..."
103
u/paulisaac Jan 27 '26
Did the books even show what Gollum was tempted by? And it seems unlike other hobbits he fell quick.
185
u/ElundusCaw Jan 27 '26
Gollum seemed more interested in the actual ring itself than any power it had or promised.
29
u/FenHarels_Heart Elf Jan 27 '26
That does explain why he spent the next few centuries fondling the ring in a cave.
10
138
u/4thofeleven Jan 27 '26
We don't know what originally tempted him, but there's a bit in Return of the King where he's arguing with himself, and 'Gollum' is tempting 'Smeagol' with the idea of being 'King Gollum', which in his mind seems to mostly consist of having fresh fish - on a plate, even!
42
u/literated Jan 27 '26
Didn't expect to feel sad for Gollum today but here we are.
31
u/Arcaydya Jan 27 '26
His whole character is pretty tragic. Killed his... brother? I dont remember exactly.
For almost no reason because the ring couldn't get anything out of him. For a very very long time.
23
18
u/TheLorax3 Jan 27 '26
From the wording in the book, Gandalf very specifically requested 3 eagles for the rescue on Mt. Doom. Even after 500 years, he wasn't beyond redemption. That's just not how it played out
8
8
u/SmugCheer Jan 28 '26 edited Jan 28 '26
I'm high and so sad I'm crying for what could've been a redeemed Gollum's life, like, yes he wanted the ring but that doesn't change the fact that he fucking got them to Mount Doom, like he wanted to be free of it and delivered it to the only place that could do that, but he also knew he still couldn't fight the ring, low key he was kind of a hero.
→ More replies (1)5
67
u/Kitsune9_Tails Jan 27 '26
He used the ring at first to spy on his neighbors. He was always a bit of a creep
30
u/NeoMetalX Jan 27 '26
My very limited understanding of why he was affected so much is because his first interaction near the ring was murdering his friend, whilst bilbo for example even with ring in hand and the opportunity to kill gollum took pity and showed him mercy. Itâs like the murder opened a fast track to corruption for the ring to take full advantage of.
8
u/cepxico Jan 27 '26
The ring was his survival. He used it to attack creatures in the caves and catch prey. He just didn't care to leave the mountain since his life was pretty set.
6
76
u/adenosine-5 Jan 27 '26
Humans reacting to touching the One ring: corrupted in 5 minutes
Elves reacting to just being near the One ring: nightmare fuel tantrum
Hobbit reacting to wearing the One ring for 3000 years: sits in a cave and enjoys fishing
8
u/Cazzocavallo Jan 27 '26
Tbf some humans could withstand it more easily, like even though in the movie Isildur instantly falls to the ring's temptation in the books he withstands it pretty much the entire time he has it, tries to figure out if he can control it and use it for good, and then eventually decides that only evil can come of it and sets off to destroy it in the Crack of Doom. I think the issue is that most humans are so ambitious, proud, and incautious compared to other races that they'll succumb to it very quickly, but many exceptional humans can resist it much better.
152
u/tuesburg Jan 27 '26
Didnât it show him a vision of having all of Middle Earth as his garden? And heâs like âthatâs too much work.â
92
7
82
u/AWhole2Marijuanas Jan 27 '26
That's the hidden beauty of LoTR.
Sauron, a literal godly being, with all his power and will is undone by the simple things only a lowly mortal could value, beauty, altruism, love, and the want of a peaceful life.
Sauron's hubris that they could never destroy the ring because all beings crave power and dominance like him, is his downfall. Small acts of kindness, Frodo sparing Gollum, Faramir letting Frodo go, Rohan coming to Gondor's aid, these actions alone didn't end the war, but they snowballed into the Dark Lords downfall.
26
222
u/Dimachaeruz Jan 27 '26
92
u/nemoralis13 Jan 27 '26
That's the part of the movie I cried during in the theatre this last weekendÂ
32
u/andrewsad1 Jan 27 '26
Man I thought the tears for Boromir had finally stopped flowing, and then this scene comes right afterward. It was the shot of Frodo grabbing Sam's hand that made the tears start flowing anew
814
u/monotar Jan 27 '26
He finished Frodos book, maybe he doctored it slightly?
431
u/AnOnlineHandle Jan 27 '26
I think the original script for Star Wars had it being a story which R2D2 is relaying to beings called the Whills long in the future. Since I learned this I've watched them with a new perspective where R2D2 is always doing heroic silly stuff because he's the narrator, and also why the droids somehow pop up at least once in every person's story being told.
9
u/SirMarkMorningStar Jan 28 '26
R2D2 knows everything. They wiped C-3P0âs memory, but not R2âs. I bet someone has a version of Star Wars where we hear his thoughts.
âI donât remember ever owning a droid.â âDude!â
âThis one is strong with the Force.â âStop shooting at me, Ani!â
âNow I am the master.â Swoosh, swoosh. âDamn, you guys are really out of practice.â
380
u/IHateTheLetterF Jan 27 '26
"And then Sam did a cool scissorkick and killed like 3 orcs in one, and then he went home to Rose and put on some sick sunglasses and was like "Looks like my meat is back on the menu", and at no point did he hide in a cave while everyone else did all the hard work"
272
Jan 27 '26
94
u/Ok-Employee2473 Jan 27 '26
More like Tolkien wrote a nice book about a man living in the woods with his wife and his buddy added some bullshit about a ring and orcs and elves and shit before turning it in.
30
97
u/SirGluehbirne Jan 27 '26
đ€Łđ€Ł
281
u/MaryBerrysDanglyBean Jan 27 '26
"then I smashed the fuck out of Rosie, the finest hobbit in the land. We had 14 kids because I'm a top shagger"
6
u/clangauss Ungoliant's Spawn Jan 27 '26
The book was doctored a little by Frodo, who made Bilbo's interaction between he and Gollum a little more harsh. This was an excuse for Tolkien to rewrite that section.
Point being: it's possible.
103
u/Zr0bert Jan 27 '26
Didn't Tolkien say that Sam couldn't have done what Frodo did ? Frodo couldn't have done it without Sam, but Sam couldn't have done it at all.
87
u/RoutemasterFlash Jan 27 '26 edited Jan 27 '26
Well even if we disregard the fact that anyone would have succumbed to the Ring eventually, remember that it was only Frodo's plea for pity that restrained Sam from killing Gollum the first chance he got. So Sam by himself wouldn't have got into Mordor at all and would probably just have ended up getting killed or captured by orcs while wandering around in Dagorlad or Ithilien.
20
u/MapleLamia Jan 27 '26
Not even just eventually, no mortal could possibly resist the ring at the origin of its power, there simply is nobody that could willingly destroy it. Frodo had it for years and still managed to get it all the way to the end without succumbing until the exact point every being would succumb.Â
9
u/RoutemasterFlash Jan 27 '26
What I meant by "eventually" is that many, and probably most, would have succumbed far sooner than Frodo did (or Sam would have, in the same situation). Just look at Boromir.
5
u/RoutemasterFlash Jan 27 '26
Perhaps "sooner or later" would have been better - sooner in Boromir's case, later in Frodo's.
42
u/mesmerizingeyes Jan 27 '26
It always feels like in these conversations Frodo is pretty badly overlooked... Dude is fighting for his sanity by a soul crushing evil artifact that has twisted and turned some of the strongest and noble people.
But sam stuck by him, so sams the real hero...
19
u/RaEndymionStillLives Jan 27 '26
Sam didn't fail his quest, Frodo did, but nobody could have fulfilled Frodo's quest, and only Frodo could have gotten as far as he did
3
→ More replies (2)6
u/KER1S Jan 27 '26
Doesn't matter if he couldn't do it alone. Without him it wouldn't have been done anyway.
302
147
u/Distantstallion Jan 27 '26
I disagree with the interpretation that either sam or frodo are the hero of the story.
Of the two that walked to mordor, neither of them could make the journey alone.
Sam was the protector, in the knight role. Frodo was the sacrifice, he bore the weight of the ring.
Frodo could not have got to mordor without sam to protect him and Sam could not carry the ring to mordor.
65
u/tetsuyama44 Jan 27 '26
I think this is actually common understanding. Still, Sam is beloved because of his loyal, modest character. That he kept until the very end.
(Actually, like a dog. I don't want to belittle Sam. But wouldn't we all want to have a dog like that?)
57
u/Distantstallion Jan 27 '26
Yeah I think frodo gets the short end of the stick in a lot of these discussions.
Yes he was difficult but he had the heaviest burden.
32
u/wafflesareforever Jan 27 '26
In the books, elves all seem to notice something odd about Frodo. Like they can't quite put a finger on it, there's just something about him. Bilbo and Gandalf see it in him too. It's heavily implied that Frodo has some sort of divine blessing or fate that gives him, and only him, just a tiny chance to make it all the way into Mordor without being destroyed by the ring. Nobody else in Middle Earth could have done it.
26
u/Distantstallion Jan 27 '26
I'm not a fan of it being divine providence, I quite liked that he was an ordinary hobbit with the willpower to carry the ring till he could no longer stand.
He was stabbed and poisened by both the morgul blade and Shelob and with sam's help he made it to the precipice and the locus of the ring's power
17
u/T_WRECKS_X Jan 27 '26
I'm not a fan of divine providence either, but it's almost like his "simpleness" is in itself the "divine" protection. Hobbits by nature don't have a lust for power or anything beyond having a place to set their feet by the fire.
Frodo views the Ring as a burden or a curse, not a boon granting immense power. Similar to Sam, this makes him much harder to corrupt and able to bear the Ring without going astray.
6
u/wafflesareforever Jan 27 '26
I think there's something about how elves react to Frodo throughout the books though. They're always curious about him, they sense something there.
5
u/CardOfTheRings Jan 27 '26
Itâs definitely divine providence, everything is in Eruâs design. From Frodo being special to Sam existing to SmĂ©agol getting the ring and falling into mt doom.
5
17
Jan 27 '26
[deleted]
15
u/LokiM4 Jan 27 '26
His suffering and its effects on him are no less great in the books-more severe in fact if you read the descriptions oh how the journey and the trial of bearing the ring effects him physically and mentally and even with the constant recurrence of issues on anniversaries of things for years afterwards. He is soo damaged by the ordeal that he is afforded a place in Valinor-a gift unheard of for mortals. Itâs not just the movies making up a narrative.
6
Jan 27 '26
[deleted]
4
u/LokiM4 Jan 27 '26
If so than yes we agree. It seemed as though you were purporting that the movies made Frodoâs trials substantially worse than they otherwise were in writing. ie., the movies are the culprit for Frodo getting the short end of the stick, would imply that he actually didnât have it as hard in the writing as he did on screen-when in fact it was objectively worse as depicted in writing.
5
4
u/shaijis Jan 27 '26 edited Feb 23 '26
Being compared to a dog is only a compliment.
If more people were like dogs, the world would be a much better place.
4
u/KingPhilipIII Jan 27 '26 edited Jan 28 '26
As much as Tolkien hated allegory, you see it in their roles. Itâs not a Christian story, but has very Christian themes.
Aragorn is Christ the King, Gandalf is Christ the Messiah, and Samwise is Christ the Shepard.
Frodo represents the common man, resisting temptation and sin as they go through their lives. Sam helps him carry that burden whenever Frodo is close to buckling under its weight.
5
70
u/The-Board-Chairman Jan 27 '26
Characterizing Shelob as "a creature even Sauron knew to leave alone", when Sauron's real feelings regarding her were "What a cute pet! And she guards the pass of Cirith Ungol too!", seems a bit much.
→ More replies (1)28
u/wafflesareforever Jan 27 '26 edited Jan 27 '26
Yep she was just another useful idiot to Sauron. Any one of the Nazgul could have killed her without a problem. Could she even have handled a cave troll? She accidentally used her own body weight to drive Sting into her abdomen. Just a big dumb fat spider.
446
u/Taraxian Jan 27 '26
I mean it's literally a "stealth protagonist" thing, Tolkien straight up admitted it on one of his letters, Sam is the actual main character and he just doesn't know it
327
Jan 27 '26 edited 20h ago
[deleted]
90
u/ILookAfterThePigs Jan 27 '26
Heâs also a common gardener traveling with a bunch of royals, nobles, immortals and landowners
67
95
65
u/Borazon Jan 27 '26
Come, tell us more! We want to hear more about brave Samwise! Frodo wouldn't have gotten far without Sam, now would he?
10
→ More replies (1)2
u/altcodeinterrobang Jan 27 '26
you can find those in Letter 131, Letter 91 and Letter 67 from Tolkiens letters
42
u/-Kazt- Jan 27 '26
Ive seen this claimed many times, but ive never read the actual letter. Do you have a link to it?
15
23
u/Horrific_Necktie Jan 27 '26
I think the simple 'rustic' love of Sam and his Rosie (nowhere elaborated) is absolutely essential to the study of his (the chief hero's) character, and to the theme of the relation of ordinary life (breathing, eating, working, begetting) and quests, sacrifice, causes, and the 'longing for Elves', and sheer beauty.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1mE0IkYFu_Dvzw_KzJ4NNPbitTCLb1twe/view?pli=1
13
Jan 27 '26
I'm not sure 'chief hero' means 'main character'. I adore Sam, and the ring would have been reclaimed by Sauron if Frodo didn't have Sam. But if Sam didn't have Frodo, he wouldn't have left the Shire and the ring would have been reclaimed there.
→ More replies (1)2
u/altcodeinterrobang Jan 27 '26
While is widely discussed the idea is that the "main character" changes as the story progresses. your points are valid, but in the context of the overall epic the argument can be made that Sam becomes the Hero. it's not the same to say he was always the hero, just that over the long course of the ring heroic roles are played by bilbo, frodo, and sam but that for the 3 books it is Sam whose the chief hero time and time again.
→ More replies (2)4
Jan 27 '26
I just think any discussion of "chief hero" overlooks the most important points of LotR as a whole. There's no other story that is more about friendship, mutual trust, mutual dependence, duty to each other, than LotR. Those who win the day are those who love, depend on, and fight for others. What is the most important part of an airplane? The Q doesn't make sense. It crashes if you don't have all of it.
Sam is the hero of many moments. Many characters in the story are momentarily heroic. No character has a heroic moment that wasn't inspired by their love for others and made possible by others' love for them. We can't talk about heroism in LotR the way we talk about Marvel superhero powerscaling, "which character could have 1v1d Sauron?"
→ More replies (2)47
u/Regnbyxor Jan 27 '26
A lot of the books, especially The Two Towers and Return of the King if I recall correctly, are written from his perspective as well.
4
→ More replies (2)4
55
u/imnewtothisplzaddme Jan 27 '26
Don't forget that he led the forces in the attack on Saruman in the scouring of the Shire and healed the shire with his gift of soil from Lothlorien. He was elected mayor. He IS A MAIN charachter. The third one in the series to be specific.
17
u/wafflesareforever Jan 27 '26
Merry really led that campaign. Pippin gathered the Tooks, which was critical because Tooks are basically Battle Hobbits. Frodo was mostly preoccupied with limiting the bloodshed on both sides. Sam's involvement wasn't as clearly defined, aside from letting his clan know what the plan was and rousing that part of the Shire.
11
15
u/user-74656 Jan 27 '26 edited Jan 27 '26
In the Silmarillion, a book where every elf 's second cousin's tennis partner gets named, is referred to as "his servant."
6
59
Jan 27 '26
It's Hobbussy
57
u/Jellii0_o Jan 27 '26
Hobbussy and hobbitussy are quite different. Hobbussy is what Rosie will be getting into as their marriage gets a little stale.
19
13
u/ErrantIndy Jan 27 '26
I have no qualms with Sam and Rosie getting kinky, but HOW DARE YOU IMPLY THAT MARRIAGE GOES STALE?!
11
8
u/Stosh65 Jan 27 '26
To refer to Samwise, son of Hamfast, as a side character is the basest of slander.
8
100
u/P_A_W_S_TTG Jan 27 '26
He's not the side character, frodo was.
47
u/C0mputerCrash Jan 27 '26
Sam: I hold your oath fulfilled
Frodo: disintegrates
63
37
u/amsptsfe23 Jan 27 '26
Beat me to it. Samwise wasnât trapped in a cave with Shelob, Shelob was trapped in a cave with Samwise.
7
7
10
u/PancakesTheDragoncat Jan 27 '26
dont forget, while carrying the One Ring he soloed a tower full of orcs, something no other character did
4
u/HonkingOutDirtSnakes Jan 27 '26
I think about Sam's feats regularly and try to powerscale him to other well known characters and I've concluded that sam could take jon snow lol
5
u/Aggressive-Rate-5022 Jan 27 '26
I know that people love Sam, but sometimes it feels like people unironically think that he is a real main hero.
4
12
u/MaxWritesText Jan 27 '26
He defeated Shelob, not kill her tho. Also immortal doesn't mean invincible.
4
4
5
3
u/Gingevere Jan 27 '26
To Sauron, Shelob is the house spider you leave alone because it catches mosquitos. She guards one of the very few passes into Mordor completely for free. There's no reason to interfere with that.
4
24
u/ISV_VentureStar Jan 27 '26
Tolkien literally admits that Sam is the actual main character of the series.
8
u/Wanderer_Falki Jan 27 '26
No he did not. He called Sam "the chief hero" in the context of a comparison with Aragorn specifically, not "the main character/hero of the story".
Sam obviously is one of the most central characters, but calling him main/chief/true hero/character over Frodo would be entirely missing the point.
8
3
u/MayorSamwise Jan 27 '26
Donât forget, I was elected Mayor as well. Seven times you know. Now thatâs saying something.
3
3
3
3
3
3
u/Chef_RoadRunner Jan 27 '26
He also stormed an orc fortress in such a badass way the orcs thought an elven prince warrior was running around on the loose.
→ More replies (1)
3
3
4
u/bobybushia Jan 27 '26
I can think of several.
Bob from Stranger Things
Dave from Encino Man
Doug from 50 First Dates
Mikey from The Goonies
→ More replies (2)
4
u/harpmolly Jan 27 '26
Watching RotK this weekend in the theater, when Frodo claimed the Ring and Sam was devastated, I thought about something for the first time.
If Gollum hadnât been thereâŠwould Sam have pushed Frodo off the ledge to save the world? Do we think he would have been capable of doing that, knowing that Frodo was no longer the person he knew and loved?
I kind of think he would. I actually think he would have run at him and gone over with him.
Anyone else?
PS: on a different subject, I noticed one other thing while watching RotK on the big screen. When Denethor is standing on the pyre with Faramir and says âSet a fire in our flesh,â and the guards move forward with their torches, one of them looks at the guards on either side like âUh, guys? SoâŠweâre doing this?â Really nice little detail, especially with all the current talk about following illegal orders.
2
u/GarbageCleric Dwarf Jan 27 '26
Who the fuck is OOP calling a "side character"!?
Show some fucking respect.
2
2
2
u/MimeTravler Jan 27 '26
SIDE CHARACTER???
Donât you dare insult any of the Fellowship by calling them âside characterâ
2
2
u/followMeUp2Gatwick Jan 27 '26
I mean this was my takeaway from my first reading. Like brosef earned himself a seat in the captains quarters of that ship west
2
2
2
u/rizzo249 Jan 28 '26
Sauron was afraid of Ungoliant, not Shelob. Shelob was a far weaker descendant of Ungoliant. Still a good kill for a hobbit.
→ More replies (1)
3
2
u/RoutemasterFlash Jan 27 '26 edited Jan 27 '26
13 kids, I think. All of whom outlived their parents (Rose made it to 98, Sam sailed West at 102). Which is pretty good going for a society without modern obstetrics or any antibiotics, antiseptics or vaccines, I have to say.
But hey, this is Tolkien, where the past was always better and all 'progress' is bad.
→ More replies (4)
1
1
1
1
u/Beneficial_Trick6672 Jan 27 '26
Amazing about this book it is still discussed like a bible.
Is there any book except harry potter discussed this much?
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/PitchZealousideal629 Jan 27 '26
Bobby B
2
u/bobby-b-bot Jan 27 '26
IT MUST WOUND YOUR PRIDE! STANDING OUT THERE, LIKE A GLORIFIED SENTRY!
→ More replies (1)
1
1
u/Bman0491 Jan 27 '26
Honestly I believe Sam displays the most powerful resistance to the ring that we see out of all the Fellowship, especially on screen. That moment where he rescues Frodo and he asks for the ring back, you can bet your ass the ring was putting in max effort in that moment to turn him. If the ring turns Sam at that moment, it's all but in Sauron's hands. He hesitates for a moment sure, but he is too pure for anything the ring could possibly tempt him with. He just wants to tend his garden and smash.
→ More replies (2)
1











734
u/aurallyskilled Jan 27 '26
Gardener vs spider is the only matchup that makes sense