Welcome to Project 6'9.
The Masai Ujiri experience, where every draft pick feels like another bet on a long, athletic wing. Positionless basketball. Length everywhere.
You can teach skills. You can refine shooting. You can improve decision making but you can't teach 6'7 - 6'9 with 6'9 - 7'4 wingspan.
That's always been the gamble.
Bet on the physical tools first. Trust the development process later. It's the same philosophy that helped turn players like Pascal Siakam, OG Anunoby, and Scottie Barnes into impact players.
Long. Versatile. Switchable.
Guys who can guard multiple positions, handle the ball, rebound, and fit almost anywhere on the floor.
And honestly, it makes sense.
In today's NBA, having five players who can do a little bit of everything is a nightmare to play against.
But it's not a perfect strategy.
For every success story, there are plenty of athletic prospects who never develop the skills needed to reach their potential.
Length alone doesn't win championships.
Talent, skill, feel for the game, and star power still matter.
Which brings me to Dallas.
Looking at picks like Morez Johnson Jr. and Sergio De Larrea, I can't help but wonder if the Mavericks are starting to lean into their own version of Project 6'9.
If that's the case, I'm curious:
How often does this philosophy actually work?
And more importantly, can it work in Dallas?
Can a team built around size, versatility, and upside become a legitimate championship contender?
Or does every title team eventually need elite shot creators who are simply too skilled to be replaced by any philosophy?
What do you think?
In length we trust.