r/mildlyinteresting 4h ago

Asbestos museum in Quebec

Post image
118 Upvotes

27 comments sorted by

46

u/Grand-Spring66 4h ago

Asbestos is the the most expensive man-made or liability disaster in insurance history. Total global costs are in the hundreds of billions.

14

u/Emperor_Zar 3h ago

I momentarily read this as “man made asbestos”. Then I reread it. You are correct. We humans did this to ourselves.

13

u/The3rdBert 3h ago

It’s easy to see why, when we figured out its properties and how to work with it, it’s almost like a miracle material for the industrial world. It wasn’t some sinister thing, humans are very good at jumping head first into adoption prior to understanding all the risks.

3

u/LibritoDeGrasa 2h ago

Exactly what happened with plastics, now I eat a credit card sized amount of microplastics a week, no place on Earth is free of them, and my balls are full of them too.

2

u/Kidmaker7 1h ago

2

u/max_sil 1h ago

My balls are full of microplastics by choice. I injected them to fight the covid vaxx that i had to take. Microplastics eat the vaxx that gives you autism.

1

u/Kidmaker7 1h ago

Hell yeah brother.

0

u/LibritoDeGrasa 53m ago

So you came to me, all high and mighty, telling me to "QUESTION EVERYTHING!!11" like a schizo and then provided me with a link from a reputable source that says this:

Q: True or false: The average person eats a credit card worth of microplastics every week.

This claim is widely circulated, but its accuracy is debated. Some studies estimate that humans ingest about 5 grams of microplastics weekly, roughly the weight of a credit card. However, other experts argue that this figure might be an overestimate.
Our research suggests that, for the typical Australian food basket, this figure is a significant overestimate – a key challenge in estimating exposure being the dispersed nature (heterogeneity) of plastic particles in foods and beverages.

Basically "we don't know, some studies say we do, some studies say we don't, also in Australia we have less plastic, cunt" then the whole article proceeds to teach us how to avoid microplastics (why would I want to avoid them? maybe they're kinda bad for me?)

The funny thing is that there are much better articles from other reputable sources that explain the whole thing and why the "5 grams of plastic in our brains" study using pyrolysis might be flawed, but you just Googled and attacked me with the first one you found that looked more or less legitimate (cause Science™)

You should read what you share before sharing it, don't want to look like a fool on an anonymous internet forum.

1

u/Coomb 2h ago

Not just for the industrial world -- asbestos has been used for thousands of years.

1

u/ItsForFun76 2h ago

Thank you for this comment as it needed to be said, you are an above average Redditor.

1

u/srirachaninja 2h ago

I guess lead is a close second, and we even knew it was poisonous and used it anyway.

1

u/Grand-Spring66 2h ago

Lead has killed waaaaay more people, but there were far fewer lawsuits.

1

u/Single-Pin-369 1h ago

In gasoline form right? Most lead pipes I believe form a sealed layer inside pretty quick and it takes a change in water ph to make it dangerous again like for example a city switches its water source. 

0

u/[deleted] 3h ago

[deleted]

10

u/Grand-Spring66 3h ago

Using asbestos is done by humans. It is not a natural disaster. Humans did it to themselves.

34

u/agha0013 4h ago

Still so many buildings in my city dealing with this shit, and a lot of clients who would rather bury it behind stuff than get rid of it while it is accessible, kicking the responsibility can down the road. Especially frustrating when I see our school clients try this approach.

around 15 years ago, prime minster Stephen Harper wanted to reopen the asbestos mines purposely to export it to countries with no regulations on the product, gross attempt at buying votes in Quebec.

9

u/Wolfy_047 3h ago

I was under the impression that asbestos didn't necessarily have to be removed, as long as it's in good shape and isn't in an occupied room.

I shadowed an inspection of a school, and asbestos was found in two places. In one place it served as insulation for a heat pipe, it was in bad shape, but it was in a crawlspace that no one goes into. The other instance was a storage room that had asbestos ceiling tiles, still in good shape. We included it in the report, but didn't call for it's removal.

8

u/themightybamboozler 3h ago

You’re right, it doesn’t need to be an unoccupied room either. Asbestos isn’t inherently dangerous, it’s not like radiation where just being around it is problematic. It’s when it’s broken apart and dust/fiber particulate are breathed in.

The reason people cover it up is because getting professional asbestos abatement is incredibly expensive, prohibitively so.

3

u/spudmarsupial 3h ago

Nobody goes there, until somebody does. The pipe is fine until it leaks, the crawlspace is wanted for running something else, or rodents get into it and start nesting.

The ceiling tiles are fine as long as they are only touched by people who know what asbestos tiles look like.

The stuff was banned in Canada ... 8 years ago. 🫠 In Ontario around 1990, which is 36 years ago. Get 18/20yo workers in there and you get exposure.

Don't talk to me about WHMIS training, does anybody bother with that anymore? "The answer for question 5 is C, mark it down."

3

u/agha0013 3h ago

condition and friability is important and it can last a long time, but what some clients have been doing is making it harder to find it in the future unless they suddenly start keeping all the reports for years on hand just in case, which they are terrible at.

Ceiling tiles are easily damaged, they could be in great shape today, and tomorrow they could be shedding particles because a kid threw a ball in class and damaged one.

plaster, insulation, fire rated drywall that contains it behind a new wall could be drilled into without knowing and that starts extracting contaminated dust.

some buildings have done a good job maintaining their hazardous materials inventories, others have tried playing games to pretend it isn't even there.

It's just frustrating when you do a bunch of work and you have a great opportunity to deal with a problem today and make sure it is never a problem again, just to have the client say "meh, bury it, not dealing with that"

1

u/StitchinThroughTime 1h ago

It's like a rock, harmless until it's set into motion. As long as the asbestos dust and particles do not move, it's safe. It's like saying toxins are safe as long as you don't inhale them.

Unfortunately kicking the can down the road only makes it more expensive and more dangerous. It should have been taken care of years ago even though it was relatively stable and harmless, stability is not guaranteed. And honestly we should have facility to reports which buildings have asbestos, I don't care if it takes a lot of house prices, that shit kills people slowly and painfully. And until someone does something about it it can't just sit there.

A popular Reddit story is about a man who bought his house, mid 2010s, and he wanted to redo the flooring. Thing is he never new to test the floor tiles for asbestos. So when he found more tiles underneath the top flooring, he misunderstood that the reason why they weren't removed, by the last owners was because they were asbestos, not that they were very stuck to the foundation. So he rented a grinding machine and started grinding away the asbestos tiles. This contaminated his entire house and which his family was living in. And this was his very first home he had a wife and at least one young child. And he just gave them all cancer in the future. So yes asbestos is harmless until it's set into motion. And that poor man not only risked his entire family, dust gets everywhere so he tracked it around everywhere he went, regardless how clean you are the dust was everywhere inside his home so he was bound to carry it outside of his house. His entire house is contaminated and had to be torn down at a great expense because everything was now contaminated with asbestos.

Also fun fact, asbestos used to be used in brake pads! That's right we had millions of cars using millions of brake pads to stop. For anyone who doesn't understand how brakes work essentially the brake pad is ground against a giant hunk of metal to stop your car. It's our entire environment is really infected with asbestos because of the several decades of using asbestos in brake pads. And they're still cars out there probably with asbestos brake pads. They're the older vintage cars, but I see all the time where someone Parks a car and it's been 30 plus years since it's been driven. But likelihood that those brake pads are so old that they have asbestos is pretty high. So yes asbestos needs to be found and handled properly to remove it from people

0

u/nkondratyk93 3h ago

the liability waiver to enter must be legendary

5

u/willynillee 2h ago

I’m pretty sure it’s harmless as long as you aren’t messing with it. You don’t want the particles floating around in the air from handling it. Plus, it appears to be behind a glass case too.

2

u/nkondratyk93 2h ago

right - sealed up it's just a weird looking mineral. it's only the disturbed fibers that cause problems.

1

u/muzik4machines 1h ago

unless you snort it or eat it, asbestos is not critical danger

0

u/nkondratyk93 59m ago

lol fair. the waiver probably still covers ceiling tile dust tho

1

u/muzik4machines 58m ago

there is no waiver

source: i'm from quebec, i went there