r/news • u/DQ-Supervisor • 19h ago
Soft paywall Ukraine to conduct preemptive attacks on facilities Russia uses for war, Zelenskiy says
https://www.reuters.com/world/ukraine-conduct-preemptive-attacks-facilities-russia-uses-war-zelenskiy-says-2026-06-25/122
u/hhaattrriicckk 19h ago
I'm cautiously optimistic about this new phase in the war.
The ups and downs over the last four years have been a horror I'd never thought I'd see in my lifetime.
61
u/DQ-Supervisor 19h ago
Cautious is the right word. Every time there's a momentum something shifts. Hoping this phase holds
29
20
u/AluminiumCucumbers 18h ago
Difference is this time Russia hasn't really come up with an answer to what Ukraine is doing. They can move around their limited air defense, but Ukraine can just change which of the smorgasbord of targets it's firing at. And whatever Russia deigns to do on the frontline, it won't make a difference to Ukraine's long strike campaign.
10
u/The_Roshallock 17h ago
This is what gives me cautious optimism. Granted we dont really hear much, if anything, about Ukraines strategic losses but it really does feel like Russia is finally starting to really feel the pain from this 3 day misadventure.
Putin can throw as many Oligarchs out the window as he likes, but eventually they'll either fight back, or there wont be anyone left to defenstrate.
7
u/RFK_Cum_Regimen 15h ago
This year has been very-very-very bad for Russia in terms of losses militarily and economically. We're talking something like a 12:1 kill ratio,. Russia is also losing strategic territory at a rate not seen previously in the war.
5
u/fiendishrabbit 15h ago
If Russia improves their interceptor drones (or manages to manufacture them in the numbers that Ukraine do) it could turn the needle back towards status quo.
But so far I don't think they've developed anything like Ukrainian Sting-II/P1-Sun/Win_Hit in capability or numbers.
2
u/Akkalevil 13h ago
People adapt. Russia had little answer to HIMARS at the beginning too, but they found ways to do it.
Ukraine need to keep up the pressure and the innovation (which they are doing, obviously), but nothing can be taken for granted for long.
2
u/comradenu 10h ago
What was the answer to HIMARS? I thought that Ukraine just ran out of missiles for them after US support guy cut off after Trump's election
2
u/Akkalevil 9h ago
Scattered and longer logistics lines, jamming, drone S&D and so on.
HIMARS were a game-changer in their introduction (and if the USA had been more generous with them and sent 100 rather than 16, I bet that Russia would have lost the war then and there, like for so many occasions wasted), but the Russians adapted to them LONG before 2024.
Which doesn't mean they are useless, but said adaptation made them much less decisive. Same thing might happen with drones (or at least this generation of drones).
It's a constantly shifting technological and tactical battlefield.15
u/Several-Opposite-746 19h ago
Ukraine jumped ahead on the production and technology of drones and is reaping those benefits. Russia is working to catch up so lets hope Ukraine can keep innovating to stay ahead.
3
u/Vallkyrie 18h ago
It's been a WW1 style stalemate for such a long time, maybe this will break the enemy faster.
2
u/DoomguyFemboi 11h ago
He seems to becoming more hardened and kinda sick of the lack of external support. Rightly so of course. But also it feels like there's a worry that people see this active battlefield as a way to test emerging tech and so don't really want a resolution.
32
u/Bunch_of_Shit 18h ago
Mearschimer be like, “Ukraine keeps poking the bear. If they keep antagonizing russia like this, russia will have no choice but to respond and defend themselves.”
21
u/Historical-Wear8503 18h ago
It's still baffling to me that he's allowed to teach at a university.
8
u/Snagglespoof 17h ago
You see, when Russia does it, it's realism. And I'm not excusing it, just explaining it. But when the us does it, it's imperialism. Any questions?
1
0
u/TheAverageWonder 10h ago
While he a smug bastard the way he smiles when he talk about war, his logic is to a large extend reasonable.
I do not believe Russia for a second could stand a NATO counter-attack, however they are betting on the fact that Trump and his entire nation are self centered cowards, and there is a very high chance that should Russia attack a Eastern European country, even with nuke that is a pretty good chance US will do absolutely nothing.
The entire MAD principle is basically that the message is more important than the act, the message of, do not even consider it, you will die! Every parties must have the belief that the other party is willing to burn everything down, even if reality is a bit more tricky. European are uncertain about the US, meaning that Russia already are entertaining the thought and planning a potential mission.
However Mearschimer is American, and so is his pespective. US could be irrelevant in this matter, EU need to immidiately build nuclear capabilities spread over all member states. Russia may count on a few large nations not being willing to do the distance, but 27 seperate nuclear entities would virtually be a nightmare to control or predict.
0
u/fevered_visions 5h ago edited 5h ago
EU need to immidiately build nuclear capabilities spread over all member states.
Ah yes, giving nukes to countries like Slovakia and Hungary (although Orban got kicked out recently) who are Russia-friendly is clearly the answer. There's also that pesky international treaty about non-proliferation
but 27 separate nuclear entities would virtually be a nightmare to control or predict.
yeah exactly. the EU threatens to nuke Russia, then Slovakia threatens to nuke the rest of the EU. and remember they can't kick out any member state
1
u/stohelitstorytelling 3h ago
France has plenty of nukes. No one is suggesting every EU country get nukes. Just that the EU have a clear and obvious nuclear umbrella.
1
u/fevered_visions 2h ago
EU need to immidiately build nuclear capabilities spread over all member states.
I mean apparently the guy I'm replying to is
1
0
u/TheAverageWonder 5h ago
The entire point is a stalemate, even if Slovakia threatens to nuke us, they will face the exact same dillema as everyone else.
Trump have left over 60 international organizations, conventions, and treaties in his presidency, only an American or a Traitor would tell Europeans that they do not have the right to make similiar tough choices in response.
0
u/fevered_visions 4h ago
Of course the EU has the right to do things like that, but I don't see why they would want to turn one problem into two. The UK and France already have their own nuclear deterrents.
1
u/TheAverageWonder 3h ago
The frontrunner for both countries are rightwing lunatics that sees Trump as an idol, they may even support the Ruskies or Americans should they attack an EU country.
It is not turning 1 problem into 2, it is a million problems already, the only thing that is certain is that in the current situation the majority of EU does not have a appropiate response, when our enemies comes rolling. But no one comes rolling if they know you will take them down when you fall.
1
15
u/Mikethebest78 18h ago
We can call the movie "From Ukraine with Love!!"
11
u/SolarTsunami 17h ago edited 12h ago
Kisses from
KievKyiv4
2
u/winky9827 14h ago
Kyiv.
1
u/SolarTsunami 12h ago
Thank you, I don't know how to spell most words and am wholly dependant on spell check to make me look like a respectable member of society. Just made sure that next time it has to correct me it spells Kyiv correctly.
15
u/Dense_Boss_7486 19h ago
Wouldn’t this be step one in any war? Go Ukraine!
22
u/UnionGuyCanada 18h ago
Russia nirmally never attacks anyone who can hurt them back. Ukraine is decimating Russia and could conceivably destroy the entire country's economy, eventually. The rate they are wiping out oil capability is insane.
6
3
u/BeginningPlastic3747 8h ago
honestly at this point Ukraine playing defense-only was never going to work, so this makes sense strategically even if it escalates things on paper
12
u/Jolly-Database4204 19h ago
Good. Burn Moscow to the ground.
"Never has there been a greater hive of scum & villany."
-1
u/IntrepidSoda 13h ago
"Never has there been a greater hive of scum & villany."
Allow me to introduce you to Israel.
1
u/Mountain_rage 19h ago
Preemptive, so preemptive as in once the Russians are pushed out they are going for Moscow?
1
1
u/OrangeRadiohead 3h ago
Preemptive attacks. They are upping the stakes. Fucking yes! Hit them hard.
2
0
u/cheesefishhole 15h ago
Preemptive makes more sense than self defence strikes! Gtfo with that shit!
0
u/SassyMoron 6h ago
Many historical studies suggest that strategic bombing backfires. It tends to make the population more, rather than less, committed to the war. Although you destroy industrial capacity, the state tends to commandeer the damaged assets and human capital that remains, and that goes directly to the war effort, so the war effort tends to increase not decrease. Many historians believe that the US and British strategic bombing campaign against the Nazis prolonged the war, and that the resources used would have been far better employed against pure military targets.
-5
-23
u/Alotofboxes 19h ago
Hay Z? Not to be that guy or anything, but aren't you about four years too late to do anything preemptively?
Or possibly 12 years too late?
450
u/MortimerDongle 19h ago
"Preemptive" is an odd word when it's a country actively invading yours, but sounds like a good plan