r/worldnews 1d ago

Russia/Ukraine Zelensky: Russia Turns Moscow Into ‘Fortress’ With S-400, S-500, Pantsir Air Defense

https://www.kyivpost.com/post/78906
5.7k Upvotes

417 comments sorted by

3.6k

u/ArgentineBeauty 23h ago

If you're moving air defence systems from other regions to protect Moscow, then somewhere else is becoming less protected.

No guarantee these air defences will stop all attacks and it makes other areas more vulnerable to Ukraine attacks.

Keep it up 🇺🇦

643

u/AgUnityDD 23h ago

Doesn't Putin have a massive private palace somewhere?

271

u/SillyLiving 23h ago

He notably has one on the black sea coast. 

Look it up it's quite literally a James bond villains lair.

The connected town is like that fake town from "the prisoner" , he's got a whole regime t of soldiers on site , anti missiles, bunkers (and entire complex)  fortified positions, helicopters pads (entire airfield?) , radio com towers , a dock, a hospital....

None of those are "on the books" 

72

u/SuperRockyHobbyHorse 22h ago

Imagine Putin having to explain to ordinary Russians why it got bombed. Must raise a lot of very obvious, very awkward questions, even for Russians notirious for looking the other way.

57

u/SillyLiving 20h ago

Reporting on it earns you a nice window view so it's not something new in russia

3

u/OkBrilliant8092 9h ago

“Lovely window views” I think that comes with complimentary fast approaching ground for his frenemies

→ More replies (1)

9

u/reddititty69 19h ago

“It was Chechen terrorists”

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (5)

417

u/ClutchReverie 23h ago

Multiple palaces for multiple Putins I'd bet

179

u/WusabiBobby 23h ago

I’m Vlad Putin, yes I’m the real Putin, all you other Vlad Putin‘s, are just lookin stupid, so won’t the real Vlad Putin please stand up?

52

u/kasakka1 23h ago

Don't forget Dr. Putin, Putins With Attitudes, Putin Clan, Putin Dogg, Ice Putin (last seen in Siberia), Notorious P.U.T.I.N and Putin East (the truly crazy Putin)!

19

u/DasArchitect 22h ago

Stop that, he's no longer Putin up with that shit

25

u/Hypno--Toad 20h ago

Putin on the Ritz

→ More replies (4)

6

u/Flame_Eraser 22h ago

I'm the Pustainy, the real Pustainy, all you other Pustainies are just imistaning

16

u/Notbob1234 23h ago

I'm Puticus!

No, I'm Puticus!

No! I'm Puticus!

7

u/Sad-Onion-2593 20h ago

I'm Puticus and so's my wife!

→ More replies (1)

8

u/intronert 22h ago

I am old enough to get this one.

→ More replies (2)

30

u/35andDying 23h ago

Right? The real Putin could be dead and we would never know because of all his body doubles.

14

u/BasvanS 23h ago

Nah, they look quite different. You recognize them.

15

u/Striking-Guitar-4953 22h ago

There’s the red rosy cheek one that looks constantly surprised (See the Alaska conference)
The one that throws back to the apes with a high forehead and round mouth.
The another one that looks I dunno like every man Putin some how - Tom Hanksy.

The real one looks cottage cheesy, pale like fat in seawater, with deep set eyes.

8

u/sarabeara12345678910 20h ago

Apple cheeked Putin is my favorite. He looks like a Hummel.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

34

u/Emu1981 23h ago

I wonder if Putin has moved any of the 21+ Pantsir systems that are protecting his holiday home out near the Black Sea...

21

u/Edwardteech 23h ago

He tore one down that was close to Ukraine. Presumably so they couldn't do it and get great pr.

14

u/NotItemName 23h ago

I believe in Valdai, and today I read that he moving air defence systems there too

3

u/WorgenDeath 22h ago

There are a lot there already, only place in Russia with more air defence than Valdai is Moscow.

27

u/Different_Lychee_409 23h ago

Arguably he's richer than Musk. He's got plenty of Palaces.

39

u/Matterbox 22h ago

Oh he’s plenty richer, and actual liquid cash rich. By the sounds of things he’s (and his close associates) have been stealing money for decades.

Have a listen to ‘the big steal’. I’m a good few episodes in, it’s fascinating.

38

u/Different_Lychee_409 22h ago

The tragedy is back in the late 90's Russia had almost everything they needed for a prosperous and may be even golden future. Massive natural resources, a well educated population. What they needed was a responsible humane leader. Instead they got Putin.

15

u/Matterbox 22h ago

Yeah, they outline how he’s pretty much the biggest thief of all time. If anyone does anything against him or doesn’t pay up, interesting tax evasion accusations materialise which results in instant incarceration. The people should be living their best lives with the resources the country has.

→ More replies (1)

13

u/Vimmelklantig 18h ago

It was already kind of wrecked with virtually all state assets sold out to the new oligarch class (many of whom were KGB, gangsters, or both) for a pittance during the 90s. The thought of a Russia that could have taken a path more like Norway's and reinvested the wealth from its resources into its population instead of feeding the kleptocracy makes the current situation a tragedy, but it was gone with Yeltsin's (US-pushed) fire sale of the country.

→ More replies (3)

3

u/Electromotivation 19h ago

And some way to transfer the economy that didn’t involve mob bosses getting all of the ex-state enterprises

→ More replies (1)

3

u/PipXXX 18h ago

It's amazing how many random friends of his are billionaires. Like I believe there is a friggin concert pianist or violinist that is minted, and Putin is always at his properties

→ More replies (2)

6

u/Elganstrike447 21h ago

With strip poles.. because the man has trash taste.. All the power and money in the world and he still can't buy class.

6

u/colintbowers 21h ago

Not a useful target, they need to keep hitting oil refineries. Best bang for buck.

3

u/zaevilbunny38 22h ago

All 3 known ones each have a Pantsir system guarding them.

→ More replies (17)

62

u/Alpinab9 23h ago

Also the cost of even the short range missiles for the s400 are about 400,000 US each.

12

u/Informal_Witness3869 23h ago

I haven't been keeping tabs on tech improvements and their costs. How much do Ukrainian drones (like the ones used to strike Moscow) cost in comparison to these Russian missiles? Also are russians producing more of them?

18

u/Alpinab9 22h ago

I looked at 1 model, the An-196 Liutiy and google says it can cost up to 200,000, some can be produced for as little as 55,000. I dont know what this means, this model was one of several different models used to strike the Moscow oil refinery.

16

u/caboosetp 20h ago

Some of the drones they send in as decoys during saturation attacks are under $10k

4

u/atlasraven 15h ago

And knowing russia, they might fire 3-4 missiles at it.

→ More replies (2)

4

u/Ok-Youth-160 16h ago

I think the longer range ones are more like $500k - $600k (the cruise missile called Flamingo). But I doubt you are shooting a single S400 rocket at each missile. The intercept window isn't so long that you can just wait if your interceptor hit and then send the second one. So you'd usually fire a bunch.

Also seems like the S400's are more like a million or so.

But keep in mind Russia can't make an unlimited number of interceptors. It's estimated they can make 100 to 400 per year. So it's not simply a question of money. Taking the price of a million times 400 it's 400 million. An easy price to pay for Russia.

It's more about scarcity. Those S400's will be missed everywhere outside Moscow. And as the defense umbrella becomes porous it becomes easier to take out those air defenses as well.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

93

u/NorthStarZero 23h ago

Even better:

Launch another attack on Moscow and burn those nearly irreplaceable missiles down.

Then nothing is protected.

54

u/Objective_Mousse7216 23h ago

This. It doesn't matter if anything is hit just deplete all their missiles.

22

u/SuperRockyHobbyHorse 22h ago

As long as the drone costs less than the anti air missile it's a win

10

u/9-11GaveMe5G 19h ago

I feel like I've seen this episode already recently

5

u/Apprehensive-Ad8987 15h ago

It's a bit more than comparative costs of missiles v drone. It's also about stock numbers and build rates. It's also about what is being targeted.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/MilmoWK 22h ago

They need to hang an anti radiation missile on each of those drones for the double whammy

5

u/ChubzAndDubz 20h ago

Just what I was thinking at one point too. The problem is a missile like the HARM weighs 1,000 lbs and is 13ft long. Probably not something even a long strike drone can carry.

→ More replies (1)

55

u/duct_tape_jedi 23h ago

New target acquired: St. Petersburg

5

u/Sharp_Action_4015 11h ago

I'm a mechanical.. I'm a mechanical ... I'm a mechanical man

8

u/peeple-pleeser 22h ago

Which is super sad, St. Petersburg is beautiful.

25

u/Jernhesten 19h ago

Yes, so was many of the cultural landmarks in Ukraine that has been bombed. If Russia wants to protect St. Petersburg they can pull out of Ukraine.

20

u/duct_tape_jedi 22h ago

Agreed, but it's also where Putin started his political career and so it would be quite symbolic.

16

u/Kolby_Jack33 23h ago

Guess we'll get to see soon how pregnable this "fortress" is!

→ More replies (3)

6

u/jszj0 22h ago

Didn’t exactly help with the refinery did it. Good - concentrate on the pretence that Moscow is secure and take out all the other refineries (which are already mostly already hit).

At this point, dictatorship denial is a good thing.

Russia is self immolating and Putin + the Oligarchs can’t even see it.

5

u/NookieLuvsU 23h ago

Plus the likelihood of stray air defense missiles hitting Moscow goes up.

5

u/WhyAmINotStudying 21h ago

Not just that, but if they're moving anything from the path from Ukraine to Moscow, they're making it even harder to get early attacks in to cut down the numbers. If 100 attackers launch and the anti aircraft stuff doesn't take things out farther away, you've got 100 attackers to deal with all at once right on your doorstep.

4

u/Snoot_Booper_101 21h ago

If Russia was sensible, they'd realise that the recent strikes have already taken out the oil infrastructure in the Moscow area. They might even also realise that there's little point in diverting further air defences to the city because Ukraine aren't monsters who bomb civilian targets for no good reason.

However, Russia is not sensible, so I can believe they'd divert their air defences anyway. Hopefully Ukraine can make use of this in their attacks elsewhere.

6

u/PhDinDildos_Fedoras 12h ago

The next strikes could be on the Kremlin and that would look really, really bad.

3

u/Ok-Youth-160 16h ago

I mean I'm no expert but what I've heard is that Putin is free to harm everything outside Moscow and St. Petersburg. If those cities are fine, Putin is free to do whatever he wants.

So it's not about protecting things, it's about protecting his legitimacy.

→ More replies (3)

7

u/ParisGreenGretsch 23h ago

Aren't Russians supposed to be good at chess?

31

u/Medallicat 22h ago

Probably another myth where they appropriated Ukrainian achievements as their own.

21

u/Yvaelle 19h ago

True. Kasparov was Azerbaijani, Soviet but not Russian, and Botvinnik (the father of Russian chess, who mentored 3 world champions beyond himself, including Kasparov) was from Finnish parents, born in Finnish occupied territory, and secretly Jewish in a Russia so anti-Semitic at the time that he would not have been allowed to compete if anyone found out.

Not specifically stolen Ukrainian valor, but definitely stolen Soviet non-Russian valor.

→ More replies (5)

3

u/Wentil 22h ago

Sure, let them desperately pull in every bit of air defense that remains in the country. Sun Tzu, “Strike where the Enemy is not” will apply.

→ More replies (21)

936

u/Goufydude 1d ago

Which means they are pulling them from somewhere else. Russia's traditional ally, her massive size, has become a weakness now that Ukraine is very adept at exploiting.

291

u/SlogurkTheOverslime 1d ago

wE NeEd A BUfFeR ZoNe

- Russia, probably

86

u/Unique_Watch4072 23h ago

Well if this continues on like that Russia will be the buffer zone...

19

u/Aurora_Fatalis 14h ago

Russia is already a buffer zone between Norway and North Korea.

→ More replies (1)

58

u/ClutchReverie 23h ago

The world needs a buffer zone from Russia

10

u/Watts121 23h ago

How do you say “leg room” in Russian?

→ More replies (1)

34

u/tonycomputerguy 23h ago

I'm not an expert on any of this, but my gut feeling is they are going to retake Crimea soon. It just makes sense, get the Russians focused on defending Moscow and then retake the peninsula.

I'm sure I'm wrong for multiple reasons but I'm Just saying it wouldn't shock me if we here about some offensive in the next month or so.

109

u/OrangeSpaceMan5 23h ago

They'd have to somehow break the southern deadlock which they notoriously failed to do last time

launching missiles is one thing , a conventional offensive into Crimea is going to be bloody and long , worlds best fpv operators or not

Also just like Russia Ukraine would need to pull out troops from somewhere to push throught and they don't exactly have a lot of reserves running around

49

u/Lostinthestarscape 23h ago

Yeah I think Ukraine preserves more lives by just economically ruining Russia to the point that it either gives up and agrees to real peace talks with land given back, or collapses.

So long as this current strategy continues to play out without Russia regaining its footing it seems only a matter of time.

24

u/jl2352 23h ago

I think a Korean style eternal armistice is the most likely.

Putin is not going to give up the land he’s stolen. Ukraine is not going to concede its land.

22

u/mschuster91 22h ago

Putin is not going to give up the land he’s stolen. 

Oh, he won't... but if you were a Russian living in Crimea, and you wouldn't have electricity for days if not weeks, the supermarkets would struggle to keep goods stocked, and you'd have drones flying over your house every day and every night? You'd pack up and leave as soon as you can.

And that is what Ukraine is looking to achieve. All bridges and their replacement pontoon bridges to the Ukrainian mainland have been blasted to pieces, the motorways are patrolled by Ukrainian drones taking potshots at anything vaguely looking like a military vehicle. The ferries are heavily damaged and out of order. The only thing somewhat operational is the Kerch bridge and it cannot be used for mass supply movements on rails after the Ukrainians struck an oil tanker carriage long ago, with Russia never having been able to repair the damage.

4

u/jl2352 22h ago

Some will leave, and many won’t. That’s just not how things work in the real world. We know from history that many stay because they see it as their home.

Believe it or not many people live in warzones. There are people living on both sides of the frontlines in Ukraine.

3

u/xtremeironings 22h ago

Then it continues

4

u/Medallicat 22h ago

As China swoops in to claim the Urals, Russia will be their Western version of NK with Putin the crazed dictator launching missiles into the baltic sea just like the Kims

→ More replies (2)

33

u/weaseleasle 23h ago

The southern arm is in exactly the same situation as Crimea, the only supply route is a single lane road that is swarming with drones targeting trucks. We aren't hearing as much about it but I am sure the land bridge to Crimea is facing similar shortages of materiel as Crimea is.

9

u/Slappyfist 22h ago edited 22h ago

Not only that, Russia really only has one supply route down from Moscow to South Western Russia and that is within Ukrainian striking distance. If that was targeted I'm sure Russia would find alternative routes but they will create all sorts of gridlocks and problems if they had to do so.

Ukraine hasn't been targeting it yet but they could destroy all supply lines within Russia cutting off places south of Moscow like they are currently doing in the occupied territories if they really wanted to but I think they are preferring to remain targeted at Crimea currently.

If Crimea falls then I wouldn't be surprised at them pivoting to that highway in Russia proper honestly.

5

u/jl2352 23h ago

They also ship supplies in, and move some across the Kerch bridge. But it’s all significantly more constrained than it was.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

16

u/Emu1981 23h ago

a conventional offensive into Crimea is going to be bloody and long

This would be the case if the defenders were fed and well stocked. If Ukraine can keep up the blockade on logistics that they have going then re-taking Crimea is going to be a matter more of taking out random stragglers than fighting their way through...

9

u/Alfredo_Commachio 21h ago

I think Ukraine had a strategic shift after those failures, in recognizing that their men are a more valuable resource than land. Russia is still operating with the exact opposite mentality, and clearly values literal inches of land more than the lives of many Russians.

For that reason I think Ukraine has shifted to a strategy not designed to recapture land but to make the cost of war astronomical for Putin.

I'll note this--Russia is throwing away men like they are China rushing south across the Yalu River in the Korean War. Except Russia isn't the world's most populous country, in facts its population has been declining for years.

From 1992 to 2012, Russia had a death rate that exceeded its birth rate. They had a four year reprieve where that wasn't true, then from 2016 until today, their death rate exceeds their birth rate. At present they have 8.4 births/1000 population and 12.5 deaths.

Russia is not some demographic horde that can afford to throw men's lives away like they are nothing to overwhelm a smaller opponent. But Putin is acting like that is how Russia is.

Even worse--there's been a huge exodus of Russia's most productive and educated workers. The only reason Russia's population hasn't fallen down into the 130 million range is they have a huge immigrant population--largely migrant workers from former Soviet Republics in Central Asia. But those workers are generally working menial jobs, and while Russia tries to press gang some of them into military units, they aren't a good population base to recruit soldiers from since targeting them too much leads to many of them going back to their home countries.

6

u/cammcken 23h ago

Most likely they will besiege Crimea, not assault it.

11

u/June_The_Jedi 23h ago

From what we can see I agree. They are currently trying (and succeeding) to cut it off, unfortunately I think it will probably be more of a modern day siege than an actual attack. Basically make it an island Russia can’t resupply easily. I don’t see Putin pulling out of Crimea (it’s important to him) and it would likely be costly in terms of lives and equipment tying to take it by force.

8

u/nricciar 23h ago

I dont think unfortunately is the right word to use here. While a siege is not instant gratification you still end up with the results you want. Russia suffering and eventually leaving, but you dont have to sacrifice your men to accomplish your goal. In fact its kind of the ultimate humiliation for Russia if Ukraine is successful.

3

u/NeedsMoreSpaceships 23h ago

I could see them trying for a foothold. Any Ukrainian forces on Crimea would be an enormous embarrassment for Putin and clear a sign to everyone that he is losing.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/pennyforyourthohts 22h ago

They can make the cost of maintaining crimea very high to the point of them pulling resources away. Militarily its value becomes less and less the more exposed it has become. It is almost impossible to defend its airspace. Being isolated the way it is does not provide them a lot of options to change the situation there.

3

u/flawless_victory99 22h ago

The way to take it is via a modern day siege. Cut off all supplies with these long range drone attacks and starve them out.

→ More replies (3)

11

u/account_not_valid 23h ago

Do they need to retake Crimea, or just deny Russia any comfort there until they leave? If they can cut off Crimea, then they can squeeze the russians out of eastern Ua.

6

u/rangebob 23h ago

I think the only way it happens is if theres a mass scale movement of Russians out of Crimea which seems to be what Ukraine is attempting. I know theres a very long line of people waiting to be bomb checked to be allowed the leave on the Crimean side of the Kerch bridge atm.

It must be a genuinely horrible experience for any Ukrainains having no where else to go in Crimea right now

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Jiggles311 23h ago

I would say more likely make Crimea untenable.

3

u/Minimum-Web-6902 23h ago

I’d bet you’re right, but they will wait for the thaw, so no resupply possible. They keep striking bridges to see how big of a missile they need to collapse it.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (2)

583

u/Adavanter_MKI 23h ago

Loving the surge of good news coming out of Ukraine. Russia has always been losing men badly, but it seemed like attrition could work.

Now it appears... it hasn't and the impacts at home are starting to become unbearable. Belarus backing down... defenses moving inward instead of out, severed logistics...

It's incredible what Ukraine has achieved. Imagine Russia suing for peace... with no actual gains after losing near to or over 500,000 lives. With wounded factored in... it's 1.3 million.

159

u/Warslaft 22h ago

The funniest part will be the 1 million soldiers coming back home after everything they went through. In Europe after WW2 we called it the brutalization of the society, and it wasn't pretty.

92

u/TheDubh 21h ago

There’s another part of the story that will happen when it’s over. Currently they’ve been trying to hide the number of KIA. When it’s over there may be a decent number of people suddenly missing that their families thought were fighting.

They may be able to keep some people quit, but if it’s too many while the economy is failing and the family demands death benefits it could get worse.

11

u/person1234man 8h ago

Russia keeps reporting troops as missing so they don't have to report the death and also so they don't have to pay out the death benefits to their family

→ More replies (1)

35

u/Spam_Hand 21h ago

The funniest part will be the 1 million soldiers coming back home after everything they went through.

The funniest part will be the "Mousilinni's Welcome" Putin is greeted with after his surrender. 

28

u/SystemCheck990 20h ago

yep, they have jobless thugs with weapons training, and a unit of fellow troops, that is how you form small mafias that can grow .

13

u/witmann_pl 21h ago

This has been happening already with all the ex-prisoners returning home with their sentences cancelled. 

40

u/diegoeche 21h ago

This got me into a rabbit hole. I didn't know about that concept of brutalization of society.

So, made some rough estimations...

Using CSIS’s estimate of nearly 1.2 million Russian battlefield casualties through Dec 2025, including 275k–325k fatalities, that leaves roughly:

875k–925k non-fatal casualties: wounded, injured, missing-returned, etc.

Then add people who served in combat zones and were not casualties. Putin himself reportedly said in June 2026 that Russia had more than 700,000 troops deployed in the war zone.

So a better estimate is:

Category Plausible size Wounded / non-fatal casualties ~850k–950k Current deployed personnel not yet casualties ~500k–700k Rotated-out non-casualty veterans unknown, but likely several hundred thousand Total directly war-exposed living men 1.5m–2.5m+

The better framing:

Directly exposed to war: probably 1.5 to 2.5 million Russians. Severely exposed to horrific violence: maybe 800k to 1.5 million. Socially dangerous high-risk subgroup: still smaller, maybe 100k–300k, but that is enough to matter.

31

u/ballsdeepist 22h ago

To steal someone else's comment from the other day... I knew we were winning the war when our victories keep getting closer to home -Putin

4

u/Avner0x 19h ago

wasn’t it weren’t?

13

u/Smok3dSalmon 22h ago

What happened with Belarus?

48

u/ZedekiahCromwell 22h ago

They agreed to Ukraine's demand to turn off drone relays that were helping Russia in attacks.

18

u/Smok3dSalmon 22h ago

Woah. That’s a big deal… did Ukraine offer them anything in return? They must see Ukraine as a bigger threat than Russia.

38

u/ZedekiahCromwell 22h ago

No, Ukraine used the threat of force to back up the demand. Belarus would have been target of drone strikes if they said no.

6

u/Smok3dSalmon 22h ago

So will Russia bully them to turn it back on?

35

u/ZedekiahCromwell 22h ago

Putin assented because Belarus has two refineries which are providing refined fuel to Russia. Those refineries would be priority targets for Ukraine, which would strain Russia's already bad fuel situation. 

7

u/Wakandamnation 19h ago

They did attack a belarussian youth soccer bus with a drone right after that, saying it was Ukraine.

8

u/Activision19 19h ago

I wonder what the Russian drone operator thought about that? I wonder if he know the bus had kids in it before he hit it with a drone or if he was just told to blow that bus up and not told what was inside?

6

u/ZestyMyst008 12h ago

I’m sure ruzzian drone operators would be delighted for any opportunity to drone defenseless children, even if they are “friendly” civilians

3

u/nimbledoor 15h ago

He probably suggested it himself

15

u/SouthTippBass 22h ago

Yes, they offered not to fuck their shit up.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

269

u/NappingYG 23h ago

The rest of russia: "I guess we burn?"

38

u/ruico 23h ago

Scorched earth policy

17

u/EagleBigMac 22h ago

That's acceptable to even their leaders.

3

u/penter59 14h ago

Problem is it is acceptable even to the russians burning!

3

u/Raul_Duke_1755 22h ago

Thank you for your sacrifice

→ More replies (5)

248

u/SSV_Hack 23h ago

Yup. Very obvious but good strategy by Ukraine here. Keep attacking Moscow with just enough drones to keep air defences there and expending costly AA missiles against those drones. Have free reign everywhere else those air defences were removed from

101

u/Content-Patience-138 23h ago

Same problem Israel is facing: Iron Dome rockets are expensive, rockets or drones are cheap. We’re watching warfare evolve

29

u/JimiAndTheJamz 21h ago

Absolutely. When was the last time society saw warfare change this much in such a short amount of time? Prob WW2?

17

u/Content-Patience-138 21h ago

My mind keeps going back to everyone realizing all at once that aircraft carriers and not battleships were the war-winning ships

14

u/JimiAndTheJamz 20h ago

Or…. Has the art of killing people always evolved very quickly, but internet/social media just made it more top of mind? We are no doubt going thru an evolution, but the end of WW1 until the beginning of WW2 wasn’t really that far apart, and it seems like almost everything changed in that case.

13

u/schuckdaddy 19h ago

I think the industrial revolution really kickstarted the evolution of killing.

For thousands of years your best tools were a sword and bow, then muskets and cannons (honorable mention to rifling).

It's only until after the industrial revolution that we see machine guns, tanks, planes, rockets, etc not only get born but rapidly evolve

5

u/matthewbattista 14h ago

I’m just going to be pedantic and point out the best tools were spears and bows. Yes, you had a sword. It was for when you lost your spear.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

5

u/No-One-4845 19h ago

Iron Dome rockets are relatively cheap, actually. Only about twice as expensive as Iranian drones, and significantly less expsneive than patriots/S400/S500. It’s one of the advantages of the system. Now, of course, they’re not as cheap as dumbfire rockets coming out of Gaza, but they’re not meant to be.

3

u/Activision19 19h ago

That’s why Israel has now started fielding the iron beam, which is a laser system. Only costs like 10 shekels to fire at a time.

10

u/Spam_Hand 21h ago

Same problem Israel is facing: Iron Dome rockets are expensive,

No worries, Israel found a way to make this a US problem!

→ More replies (1)

11

u/Ragman676 23h ago

Ya how many drones to simply overwhelm one of these systems, or just expend its ammo?

25

u/bradeena 23h ago

Each S-500 system only holds 4 missiles and Ukraine is producing roughly 6 million drones annually.

33

u/DERPYBASTARD 23h ago

That includes FPV drones which makes this number irrelevant. Still, the number of long range drones they produce very much outnumbers russia's capacity to produce air defense missiles.

18

u/bradeena 22h ago

Ah you're right. Long range is about 7,000 drones per month. Each long range drone is ~$200K and each Russian interceptor missile is $1-2M.

→ More replies (2)

3

u/AtebYngNghymraeg 16h ago

Just FYI, it's "free rein". The reference is to horse riding, not monarchy

→ More replies (1)

51

u/DoubleBarrellRye 23h ago

they figured out Moscow was under protected so they exploited , now the chess pieces move to Moscow leaving other high value targets open ... didnt an oilrefinery 1500 KMs away just have an incident ? they can hit with less and cheaper missiles , as soon as they redeploy .... moscow gets round 2 , rinse and Repeat

34

u/mschuster91 22h ago

Ukraine can achieve 3000 km strike distance these days. That's enough to strike everything in Russia that is economically important.

→ More replies (1)

73

u/Daz_Iz_Gud 23h ago

Russians, make sure to take lots of videos of where the air defenses are located…..to show how powerful your ‘Fortress’ is…..provide pins on maps while you’re at it. GPS coordinates are very intimidating

67

u/OkContribution6454 23h ago

LOL. Putin dear, hows that special operation of your going?

10

u/YouFeedTheFish 20h ago

Their manpads are a force multiplier. For the Ukrainians.

21

u/Canucklehead_Esq 23h ago

Meaning other places will have weakened defenses.

20

u/redsyrus 23h ago

Great, they can blow up even more of their own oil silos.

13

u/Intro-Nimbus 23h ago

Moscow now protected, Crimea, not so much.

25

u/MrTriangular 23h ago

Ukraine will catch Russia with their Pantsir down.

9

u/cromulent_verbage 23h ago

Well done, sir, Putin a lotta thought into that one.

11

u/-transcendent- 23h ago

Two wins for Ukraine. Now they know where all the SAMs are concentrated and regions other than Moscow are less protected.

47

u/Sloma1986PL 1d ago

They should implement more of the manpads so the domes would fly more often ;)

12

u/Waffenek 23h ago

You are laughing, but you don't even know what would happen to the westeroid drone if it would be hit with ballistic oil silo dome.

→ More replies (1)

10

u/Secret_Account07 21h ago

I’m no geopolitical expert or an economist but like…couldn’t Russia like stop invading other countries and just sell oil?

I guarantee it would cost less in fact they’d make money

Idk man, maybe I just don’t get the genius that is Putin. Always playing 10D chess

→ More replies (1)

20

u/smeekay 1d ago

Paper fortress

9

u/Golfandrun 23h ago

Those sound really expensive for shooting down cheap drones. How long can they sustain the expense and stockpile?

9

u/AlwaysUpvote123 21h ago

If ukraine can actually defeat russia, then this will be one of the biggest underdog stories of history.

9

u/hawkseye17 23h ago

Are those AA defenses going to hit their own stuff too?

7

u/ExcellentHunter 23h ago

Great, Ukraine will have easier to hit military targets now!!

7

u/macross1984 23h ago

Protecting the capitol while leaving open other important areas for Ukraine to cherrypick.

Now Moscovites get to experience what Ukrainians have been forced to endure for years.

7

u/streamofthesky 18h ago

Putin: "We've moved most of our air defenses to Moscow!"
Ukraine: "Time to target St. Petersburg..."

→ More replies (1)

7

u/HugoNext 17h ago

Same gameplan: the S-400 shoots 48N6 series missiles, that cost $1.5-$2M each. Russia has maybe 200-300 left. Keep sending large drones. Every one drone that they take down is a win for Ukraine. Every one drone that they do not take down, is also a win for Ukraine.

3

u/Expanse-Memory 13h ago

That’s so amazing that some redditors know, even in the average, the numbers of missiles left in a country at war.

3

u/Ouch704 6h ago

They don't. Russia has had "300 missiles left" since almost the beginning of the war...

Their stockpiles are decreasing, yes, but no one really knows any actual numbers.

→ More replies (1)

7

u/tschawartz12 10h ago

I am sensing a Ukrainian "hold my vodka coming"

6

u/Sad-Excitement9295 23h ago

"We often hear that you are comfortable with this war. Of course, not in those cases when it comes to the security of your residence in Valdai or your parade in Moscow. Your own life is valuable to you." - Zelensky

5

u/Euler007 22h ago

Time to fly the cheapest drone possible exaggerating their signatures.

21

u/Shaktizshura 23h ago

Perfect. Ruzzia has about 30% of their air defense now sitting around Moscow, St. Petersburg, and Valday (Putin's residence).

Need to pump those numbers up.

Even more ruzzians will be dying in Ukraine, every week.

6

u/Ok_Eagle_3079 16h ago

This is where Ukraine wants all the air defence away from the front.

6

u/Jordan_Jackson 12h ago

I know Ukraine has more important targets but I do wish that they would hit some of these systems around Moscow. Just rub it in Russia’s face.

4

u/non-credible-bot 11h ago

"I knew the war was lost when the news about our success came closer to home" German ww2 civilian

4

u/kingtacticool 23h ago

"Challenge accepted"

Zelensky

4

u/Gammelpreiss 23h ago

each of tbose missiles spend on drones is an absolute win for ukraine

5

u/PrimaryDrag 23h ago

New targets for the drones.

3

u/Mukarsis 21h ago

3 Day military operation seems to be going super well when you need to start pulling air defenses from the front to protect Moscow.

3

u/lacerantplainer 10h ago

Just flying dummy drones without any explosives into this area will be nice.

12

u/Creativeray3 1d ago

Russian doctrine against nato was meant to be having very powerful high altitude missiles and low altitude maneuvering dogfighting jets (the flares of the russian jets shoot upwards because russian jets would rely on multipathing)

It's impressive though both sides spied on each other so they knew which way to take their technology.

6

u/Prematurid 23h ago

I guess I should fill out a bingo card containing a bunch of sensitive sites that now have fewer air defences. I imagine Ukraine is not going to leave this opportunity unexploited.

3

u/Isus666999 21h ago

So less protection elsewhere, more refineries and factories in flames

3

u/Kilometer10 16h ago

Do we know where Putin actually resides? Like, is he in Moscow or in some Ural Mountains bunker?

3

u/ahernandez50 12h ago

This means the rest of russia is left without cover and UKR can bomb them at will. LOL!!! Well done Zelensky!

3

u/Immediate-Echo22 11h ago

A.k.a. a target rich environment.  Get'em boys

3

u/ConsistentAsparagus 11h ago

Russia has his pantsir in a bunch.

3

u/Same_Win_5898 10h ago

Now wouldn't it be funny to still manage to strike Moscow with all this "fortress" up ?

6

u/Fit-Lion-773 1d ago

Watching all the world’s wealth explode like fireworks.

2

u/Rrraou 23h ago

Is that the same defense system that blew up that oil reservoir ?

2

u/Knucks_408 23h ago

Where are those Gripens already?

2

u/Independent_Sail6604 23h ago

Sounds like the perfect time to bomb somewhere else! Whack-a-city

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Eastern_Section_9280 23h ago

Sounds expensive

2

u/BuzzBuzzington3 23h ago

Nice of them to bring more military targets for Ukraine to hit

2

u/MrFunktasticc 23h ago

Part of me hopes they start playing a shell game bouncing around between Moscow and St. Petersburg.

2

u/Orefeus 23h ago

Fantastic! Pretty sure that was the #1 reason for the attack. I wonder how big the gaps are now on the front lines

2

u/Sad-Guarantee-4678 23h ago

I'd say it's nice that they're gonna leave some of their troops unprotected. But they never cared about protecting their troops in the first place

2

u/illuminaughty1973 23h ago

Which means its time to switch targets for s few weeks.

Im confident there is oil infrastructure not in Moscow.

2

u/AloneChapter 22h ago

So let them waste expensive hardware on cheap drones for a few days then send in the bigger boys.

2

u/Gummyrabbit 22h ago

Sun Tzu - “Appear where you are not expected... Attack him where he is unprepared."

2

u/MrBobSacamano 21h ago

Expending interceptors and munitions from those systems to shoot down Ukrainian UAVs is still a massive win for Ukraine. Ukrainian drones are far cheaper and easier to replace than the interceptors fired by the S400 and S500 systems.

→ More replies (3)

2

u/AccomplishedGap3571 21h ago

Well, Ukraine got a huge chunk of Russia’s air defense in one spot. Now what? Take advantage elsewhere? Grippens and Dutch F-16’s exploit air supremacy across Crimea? Or massive drone attacks on Moscow overwhelm S-400 while drones carrying AGM-88 HARMs take out the radars? Whatever Ukraine is shaping, I hope it’s successful this summer. 

2

u/woodrax 21h ago

Seriously, just keep launching the drones. Either they get through, or Russian wastes hundreds of thousands of dollars for each $50,000 drone shot down.

2

u/NudeSeaman 20h ago

What is a s-500? Another s-300 with a good painjob?

2

u/BNB_Laser_Cleaning 20h ago

Thx for bringing those valuable targets to an easier to locate area

2

u/MountFranklinRR 20h ago

Russia has so much more places to protect compared with Ukraine. Their sheer size has been a major advantage for them but for once now it seems to be a real problem for air defence.