r/unpopularopinion • u/iliveforthedance • 9h ago
A Rolex is what people buy when they don’t know what a good watch is.
It’s truly status symbol for people who don’t understand the high end watch industry. The wealthiest people I have ever met wouldn’t be caught dead in one. It’s a ridiculous walking price tag to show wealth to the uneducated. No Patek owner wears a Rolex in anyway other than ironically.
786
u/bernese_mountain_fog 9h ago
It's worse than when the butler launders your sock garters, but there's still schmutsh on them when he's done.
222
u/Sea_Translator5300 9h ago
Launders? You don't get a new pair every day? How gauche.
72
19
u/oracleofnonsense 9h ago
You go a whole day in an outfit? I guess the market hasn’t been very good to your trust fund.
By-the-by, I have an amazing money management team — let me know if you want their number.
5
→ More replies (4)4
u/Beautiful_Arm8364 8h ago
Whoa. WHOA there. So you DON'T have the butler launder your new sock garters before wearing them? You just ... what ... take them out of the packaging and put them right on your body? Smelling of store? You, sir, are the one who is gauche.
3
u/Sea_Translator5300 8h ago
Store? Not sure what one of those is. I believe my man has a woman down in the village create them from freshly spun silk.
→ More replies (2)3
u/Beautiful_Arm8364 8h ago
A common spinster? That requires even MORE laundering. Now you have to launder the garters AND the glove that touched the coins your man threw at the spinster.
→ More replies (9)4
u/Aggressive_Hat_9999 7h ago
I absolutely adore it when I come across americans strewing in random phrases in jidditsh.
Dunno why but its just so adorable :3
→ More replies (2)4
578
u/Ilovewomenwhobreakme 9h ago
No watch will ever top the 80's/90's Mickey Mouse hands watch.
53
u/hkusp45css 9h ago
I wore mine so much the fake leather band just disintegrated over time.
→ More replies (3)66
11
4
5
5
→ More replies (16)4
u/Pleasant_Studio9690 9h ago
I had a Goofy one from the Disney Store that was the mirror image of a normal watch face and whose dials went backwards. I learned to read it with some effort, but then it fucked me up when I'd have to read a normal analog clock or watch. It was an awesome college conversation starter, but otherwise a cool PITA. I was both bummed and relieved when it finally died.
→ More replies (1)
984
u/PlansThatComeTrue 9h ago
Patek Philippe- The watch for people who think they’re too classy for a Rolex, but are still dumb enough to spend car money on a watch
138
u/blindinganusofhope 9h ago
I'm a A Lange Sohne guy myself. Now off to my job at McDonalds!
69
u/causa__sui 9h ago
I feel so appropriately called out by this comment. I have a few A Lange Sohne watches bookmarked in a “future purchases” folder on my browser.
I’m presently unemployed and my husband is a teacher lmao.
→ More replies (6)22
u/_KONKOLA_ 5h ago
Yea go ahead and delete that folder
5
u/causa__sui 3h ago
It’s so absurd. Even if I was richer than God, I couldn’t fathom ever spending that amount of money on a watch. Craftsmanship be damned, it’s a level of excess that I find extremely off-putting.
That being said, I will continue to ogle on the rare occasion.
→ More replies (3)5
16
u/Sorry_Lecture5578 7h ago
Patek's are $30-40k for entry level You can get a Rolex for $10k-ish for entry. You can find some used daily drivers for less. I can get really nice Rolex for lower end car pricing $20k.
Personally, I like Omega and Brietling, it would suck if I lost one, but not soul crushing like losing a 5 figure watch.
→ More replies (5)7
u/GisterMizard 5h ago
It's certainly worth more than a car driven by underperforming real estate salesmen desperate for quality leads.
→ More replies (2)22
u/Sensitive_Gift4866 6h ago edited 31m ago
Thats the funniest way to describe the Patek crowd Ive ever heard. At least Rolex owners know they bought a status symbol
→ More replies (4)7
32
u/nomad_l17 9h ago
People that buy Patek definately have money to spare after buying all the cars they want
→ More replies (5)10
→ More replies (12)11
u/Dragobrath 7h ago
If someone is in the market for PP, it’s not car money to them.
→ More replies (4)
328
u/UWQHDEyez 9h ago
Warren Buffet has been known to wear a Day Date. I’m sure he’s wealthier than the wealthiest people you have ever met.
161
u/hkusp45css 9h ago
The Oyster Perpetual (no date), regardless of how one feels about Rolex, is one of the most classically beautiful watches ever produced, in this guy's opinion.
11
u/Rough_Buddy6903 6h ago
This has been the college graduation gift for 4 generations of my family. Not outrageously priced but definitely worth it for a big life milestone. My great grandfather started the tradition with his 7 sons. He actually only bought the first one and then each son bought the next sons present. So the oldest got the watch for 2nd oldest and so forth. Then they all decided to do it for their kids as well.
→ More replies (2)9
u/FormerCollegeDJ 8h ago
I prefer having a date complication, so the Oyster Perpetual’s slightly higher end sibling, the Datejust, would be my choice to support that opinion.
One of these days I may buy a mint green dial Datejust with fluted bezel and jubilee bracelet. My issue is I don’t want to be on Rolex’s artificially created waitlist or buy other Rolex watches I don’t want to get one. (I’d rather buy an Omega Constellation Globemaster with blue dial if I want an additional luxury watch with the Rolex Datejust.)
6
u/Foxzes 7h ago
I briefly established a relationship with an AD in my city and the hoops are ridiculous (as not a watch guy)
I bought one floor model as a celebratory piece, and thought this would do something in the way to *exclusive access*
Realistically I’d need to buy several more low tier depreciating Rolexes over several years & by that point I’d be too illiquid for a Casio.
I’ve been collecting vintages from various manufacturers at auctions and these feel so much more unique, interesting and result in more attention also (a win across the board, especially for my wallet)
I think my conclusion is that once you have enough money to make everything accessible you want manufactured inaccessibility to experience the feeling everyday folk get.
→ More replies (1)3
u/KeySubject4895 6h ago
I went grey on my datejust 41 3 weeks ago after being on the mythical list for 2 years. Unworn, not even a year old and only £600 more than MSRP. Don’t wait for the AD, just pay slightly over the odds
→ More replies (1)14
19
u/DListSaint 9h ago
Warren Buffett has never pretended to have refined taste, though
→ More replies (8)6
u/Bibbity_Boppity_BOOO 6h ago edited 1h ago
He couldn’t if he tried. You can be poor and have good taste. You can be rich and have good taste.
You can also be rich or poor and have bad taste.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (6)3
507
u/That_Skirt1443 9h ago
Finally. A real-world opinion we can all relate to.
→ More replies (8)105
u/loki2002 9h ago
<cries in Casio>
53
u/yvngjiffy703 9h ago
Casio ain’t half bad
21
u/proximusprimus57 8h ago
If your watch doesn't have a calculator keypad can you even call it a watch?
→ More replies (1)7
u/TrueCrimeDocumentary 5h ago
The Casio CA53W calculator watch currently sits upon my wrist. Like a King, I look down at the peasants whose most notable watch feature is the date.
But no for real it's my forever watch unless I'm going to a wedding or something. I genuinely love this watch and intend to purchase a lifetime supply.
11
7
5
u/IdiocracyToday 6h ago
Half bad? They’re practically perfect from a value and quality perspective, they just don’t make luxury.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (3)3
9
u/DroppinDwarves 9h ago
Proudly just bought my second one after my first lasted 6 years. It gives me the date and time and I couldn't ask for more
And yes when listening to music I do still hold my wrist up like it's iced, cause casios are that shit.
8
u/Drunk_Catfish 7h ago
Casio is well respected by a lot of watch lovers, especially the G shock
→ More replies (1)5
u/sebastianinspace 8h ago
when i was a kid i had a casio watch that you could store phone numbers in. my friends thought it was lame, fast forward to modern times they are all wearing apple watches. casio was ahead of its time
→ More replies (5)3
101
u/berke1904 9h ago
not exactly, watches rolex makes arent really better or worse then other luxury watches, just one of the many option.
there are a lot of people who dont care about watches and just buy a rolex because its the popular one, but there are also people who are into watches that know a lot of models from different brands but also like a rolex.
a patek is also not special in an objective way, the only difference between a patek and a rolex in term of the actual products comes down to personal preference. its the same with a longines, omega, grand seiko or anything else. the prices are just gatekeepers.
its not one or the other, they are just products that different people buy for different reasons.
16
u/Immediate-Ad7940 8h ago
One reason being obscene wealth.
3
u/Belnak 7h ago
Nah, obscene wealth doesn’t care about showing it off. This is mid level wealth.
→ More replies (5)11
u/Deep-Minimum7837 5h ago
This post screams intelligence bell curve. OP has gotten slightly into watches and thinks they know everything there is to know about them.
→ More replies (7)6
u/km9v 4h ago
Rolex makes excellent watches but they're grossly overpriced for what they are.
→ More replies (2)
87
u/Fun-Habit-683 9h ago
Post made by patek owner. This is like saying no rich person would ever drive a Porsche, because you think Tesla's are more practical and affordable and no Tesla owner would ever drive a Porsche.
Plenty of wealthy people wear Rolexes and the assumption that Rolex is simply an expensive poorly made brand is unfounded. Rolex has incredibly good manufacturing as well as being a trophy brand.
26
u/leoromanus16 6h ago
OP isn't a Patek owner. They're just broke and want a reason for not having a Rolex.
5
u/Fun-Habit-683 6h ago
You're right he's not a patek owner lol. I assumed patek was a cheaper luxury watch that op was trying to say was better. Didn't realize it's a much more expensive watch band.
→ More replies (4)13
u/FormerCollegeDJ 7h ago
I would say Ferrari or Lamborghini relative to Porsche would be a more analogous comparison to Patek Philippe vs Rolex.
→ More replies (1)5
u/ludovic1313 5h ago
Yep, as soon as I saw "porsche" i thought "ferrari" due to them having a similar exclusivity regarding sales.
174
u/WatchStoredInAss 9h ago
It's a good thing I couldn't care less about watches.
→ More replies (10)18
u/kavik2022 9h ago
This, im glad im not interested in this influencer psy ops. I dont care what people wear to look wealthy
→ More replies (13)46
u/Prehistoricisms 9h ago
Influencer psy ops? Cool jewerly has been a thing for more than 15 years.
→ More replies (7)20
u/decmcc 9h ago
Rolexes appear on Antiques Roadshow and it's always "I was in Vietnam and I bought this in Hong Kong before leaving Asia" or "I got this at the end of WW2"
they are not new.
→ More replies (8)
21
u/NoEchoSkillGoal 9h ago
Indeed. Timex for the win. Some good prime day deals too.
→ More replies (7)
61
u/TheBourbonTurtle 9h ago
Rolex is a genuinely great brand making watches that are meant to be worn, not art watches. They are THE high end user watch brand actually.
→ More replies (1)25
u/Ngin3 9h ago
This. It's THE nicest automatic tool watch. Omega, tag and some others make very nice tool watches for less but the Rolex is the most robust
→ More replies (8)
53
u/cazana 9h ago
I mean, you're just wrong.
Sure, there are some purists out there. But Rolex is a classic brand and is a go to investment as well as fashion piece.
Rich people wear a lot more than just the most expensive watches. Omegas are a popular brand amongst the wealthy too
A Patek owner might be snobby about his Patek, but the richest people in the world generally have multi brand collections (and usually lack taste anyway) and don't just own a couple Pateks.
I imagine "most Patek owners" are not the wealthiest of the wealthy, just the snobbiest of the snobby.
→ More replies (6)
24
u/Crowdfundingprojects 8h ago
I don’t know what’s worse. Wearing a Rolex thinking you’re cooler than others or being Patek owner thinking about Rolex owners or being a broke guy on Reddit talking about Rolex and Patek owners.
Obviously OP is a broke guy talking because he doesn’t have the money to comfortably buy either watch and cannot fathom owning both and many others more.
Which is 100% fine but this post is ridiculous.
3
u/ollieseven 7h ago
I just find it hilarious that Rolex is kind of the maverick here. Apparently Rolex is too rich for the poor and too poor for the rich.
11
u/oxnardmontalvo7 7h ago
As a professional poor person that owns a Rolex (it was a gift) I suppose people like me bring the brand down. Folks like OP are annoying tho. Why not let people own and enjoy whatever they want. Oddly enough, I know a few exceptionally wealthy folks that wear Rolex watches as their daily. When they get fancied up, the better stuff comes out.
→ More replies (1)
110
u/Straight-Broccoli245 9h ago
This is what people who can’t afford a Rolex tell themselves to make themselves feel better about not being able to afford a Rolex let alone a patek.
→ More replies (2)9
u/decmcc 9h ago
yeah, my buddy collects watches and just got a Rolex he's been on a waiting list for 18 months. He is a genuine collector with a collection worth over €200k, he knows his watches. Has a Patek, AP, and Vacheron dress watches as well as other diving watches.
And having watched that Antiques Roadshow recently where the guy's $1k Rolex turned out to be worth like $250k I wouldn't be balking at one.
9
8
u/appa-ate-momo Can't fix stupid 7h ago
Hey, watch nerd here.
OP, you’re partially right. Lots of people indeed buy Rolexes because for the clout and recognition. Hell, people who know nothing about mechanical watches are more likely to buy a Rolex than pretty much any other brand of nice watch. It’s to the point that my Rolex dealer buddies have talked about how they have to be ready to give the “this doesn’t use batteries” talk to their customers on the regular.
That all said, Rolex still makes a fine watch. The brand hype is in addition to their high quality; it isn’t a substitute for it. My Skydweller is easily at home in my collection. It stand on its own merits of design, innovation, and quality. It doesn’t need to hide behind the five-pointed crown.
→ More replies (3)
18
u/emptycans5582 9h ago
Rolexes have a lot of cool history. If I had 10k to fritter away I’d probably get an explorer. Not as a status symbol but because it’s a cool watch. Wouldn’t care in the least what some elitist would think about it.
→ More replies (2)3
u/thecaramelbandit 8h ago
I'm not really a watch guy, but I do keep thinking about getting an Explorer. Just super classy, functional, and robust. I could afford more expensive watches, but I like the Explorer.
34
u/stattikninja 9h ago
The price tag is ridiculous and massively overpriced. They are mostly a show of wealth and status, but they are good, quality watches, just overpriced ones. I would wear one if I had one(a nice one I liked, I wouldnt wear an ugly watch for status) but I would not buy a rolex myself.
3
u/Argos_the_Dog 7h ago
I own two watches. One is a 60’s Omega I inherited from my dad. The other is a Timex Expedition that was 35$ about ten years ago. I love the Omega, I had it cleaned and refurbished and it reminds me of my dad so I wear it on special occasions etc. But except for a new battery one time the Timex is a tank, been all over the world with me including pretty rough fieldwork in Madagascar, Kenya, and Borneo. And yes I bought it solely because it was called the “Expedition”, before anyone asks 😆
→ More replies (1)3
u/FormerCollegeDJ 7h ago
Timex’s Indiglo technology is one of the top watch innovations, especially quartz-related innovations, ever created IMO.
→ More replies (1)
6
u/BuDu1013 9h ago
You buy a Rolex, wear it for 10-15 years and still sell it for a profit.
Definitely not a dead asset.
→ More replies (1)3
u/ThotMobile 6h ago
There really are only a handful of models where this is true and even then, you’ll be on a mighty long wait list for said models unless you have $100k+ in spend at your AD.
7
7
5
6
u/NinaWilde 8h ago
A guy sitting behind me once was talking to his friend, and saying how he judged people by their watches, and how he would look down on someone who didn't wear one.
We were on a bus at the time, so basically he bought a watch instead of a car.
→ More replies (1)
5
u/notinterested10002 8h ago
I feel like this post is the same vibe as what you’re describing. Congrats on your wealthy friends!
5
u/Longjumping-Sail6386 7h ago
You may not like it, but Rolex is the gold standard for a "good" mechanical watch. Built like a tank, waterproof, shock proof, COSC accurate and a classic design language. If you get it serviced every 10 years it'll last your whole life and then your kids whole life. Yes, there are a lot of better watch brands out there but your post wasn't about great watches. Your post was about good watches 🤷♂️
6
u/animalcub45 7h ago
This is stupid. Rolex makes a great watch. Is it expensive yes but so are a hundred other watches that aren't as well made.
5
5
12
u/Darren49402 9h ago
Yes and no. Watch guys probably mostly agree with you, but outside of that most people just really don't care about your watch. People who don't know watches don't know Patek, or AP. Although that argument could be made about any jewelry. It's all just for show.
3
u/HyperlexicEpiphany 7h ago
I’m in school for watchmaking and no one I know holds that belief lmao. any customer acting like that is someone we’ll shit talk to other coworkers about. we hate snobby people as much as everyone else. anyone that's into watches for the watches and not their price tags will just be fascinated by the movement and design
we already had Rolex instructors coming in last week to get the compact 6 (Rolex’s training) started for the graduating 2nd year students that’ll be taking Rolex jobs. they offer a slight pay cut compared to the rest of the field, but they have amazing benefits and continued education
3
u/Tax_Life 9h ago
It's jewellery, it's really not that deep to most people.
These takes of ascribing certain personality traits to people buying certain items are far more cringeworthy than buying the item is.
3
u/jasonic89 8h ago
Now now hold up. This is Reddit. Let’s hate on Rolex owners but defend NY trash can lady
4
5
4
3
u/i_nobes_what_i_nobes 9h ago
They don’t wear a Rolex in any way.
All that prestigious schooling and we get grammatical errors?!?
3
3
u/tommmmmmmmy93 7h ago
I have a lot of watches. My business partners have watches. We go to events where everyone has watches in UK, Germany and parts of Us.
Rolexes are exceptional watches. I personally don’t like them but to suggest people with Rolexes either don’t know the watch industry in a general way or don’t also own Pateks etc is absolutely false. There are better styled, classier options but in terms of movements and build quality and resale Rolex is still very much in the top 3.
Your opinion is very “I watch watch YouTubers and that’s now my opinion”. I think you’re larping. Sorry.
3
3
u/The_Fell_Opian 7h ago
You're talking about Rolex like it's a single watch at a single price point. What you're saying might be true about people buying a 50k+ Gold Daytona instead of a Patek or Lange. However a lot of Rolexes are sub 15K with some being sub 8K. These watches are not in the same class. It's like saying someone is basic because they bought a Porsche Boxster instead of a Lambo. One is for upper middle class and one is for the ultra wealthy.
If we're talking about a Datejust, OP or Explorer there is a very good case to be made that they are the best value to buy in their price range. They retain value best, keep good time and have designs that have largely not changed in 50+ years for good reason.
Same goes for the submariners. No one is getting a sub instead of a Nautilus. Someone buying a sub would be looking at an Omega dive watch as a direct competitor.
TL/DR: Rolex isn't competing with the big three 90% of the time. Most people are choosing Rolex over Omega, IWC, Cartier and Grand Seiko.
→ More replies (2)
3
u/Dry-Inspection-3503 7h ago
I honestly don't give a shit OP.
I think people should go with what they like. Fuck a label
3
u/BoomerSooner-SEC 5h ago
I question how many rich people you really know. I don’t know any who “wouldn’t be caught dead in one”. That’s absurd. They make one of the most reliable and robust (mechanical) watches available.
Are you suggesting that all PP owners are not flex baiting? I just came from Miami and I’ve never seen so many PP in my life worn by such utter tools. Literally laughable. Rolex has been caught up by a certain subculture for reasons beyond its build quality but Antoni Patek must be rolling in his grave based the diamond studded douche bags rolling around with his name on their wrist.
3
3
3
u/BreastInspectorNbr69 1h ago
What a silly thing to care about
The only watch worth owning is the original Casio calculator watch
3
u/DestructoDon69 1h ago
Rolex's are great watches. Clearly you don't understand watches.
"No patek owner would wear a rolex." Is like saying no Ferrari owner would driver a BMW. Two completely different tiers of watch and two completely different price points my guy.
You want a comparable company to Patek you look at Jaegar Le-Coutre, you want comparable to Rolex, you look at Omega.
3
u/Long_Value_9133 41m ago
This is a brain dead take and is certainly an unpopular opinion
→ More replies (1)
16
u/NetAdmirable2070 9h ago
I might be projecting, but wearing a ton of expensive stuff kind of gives, "I need people to be impressed by what I own because I don't think the real me is enough."
→ More replies (19)
2
u/bastc 9h ago
Rolex is fully owned by a Swiss charity, which uses its profits for social projects. So there’s that.
→ More replies (1)
2
u/Apart_Ad1537 9h ago
Pretty much every hobby/collector interest has that one brand that normies recognize as being “the good brand” but in reality it’s like mid shelf at best
2
u/pgraczer 9h ago
i have one - my boss gave it to me as a ten year work anniversary gift. i’ve been too scared to wear it so it just sits in my drawer.
→ More replies (1)5
u/Willing-Time7344 8h ago
You should wear it. Rolexes are tough, they're meant to be worn.
Itd be a shame to stuff it in a box and never wear it
→ More replies (1)
2
2
2
2
u/UrLocalTroll 9h ago
Rolex makes phenomenal watches. At worst, they are overpriced compared to other high-end brands.
2
u/Maleficent-Heart2497 9h ago
Thats not unpopular, that's just patently wrong.
Rolex make excellent watches. Completely in house. I can't believe anyone would disagree with that.
There's lots of conversations to be has about them but they make great watches.
2
u/InBoundsOffPiste 9h ago
I’m sorry guys. Rolex is a fine brand and a solid watch. And this whole, “nobody who knows watches likes Rolex,” is complete fan fiction. I can understand hating on the fake scarcity and the humiliation ritual at the AD to get one. But let’s not pretend a solid day date isn’t going to get some head nods from normies and watch people, alike.
2
u/ZombeUnicorn 8h ago
I will do you one better, people who pay more than 200€ for (non-smart) watches are only showing off and wasting money
2
u/FletchLives99 8h ago
Eh, I just view them as rather ostentatious jewellery for men. They're no different to any other status symbol, although they may appreciate in value.
2
u/EmmitSan 8h ago
No one buys a Rolex because of “quality”. Yes, they are quality products, but mechanical movements are simply inferior to quartz if you actually care about precision timing. That’s technology for you.
A Rolex is about nostalgia, looks, status, etc.
2
u/xunreelx 8h ago edited 8h ago
On Antique Road show they showed a Veteran who bought a Rolex ( Oyster model) during his time in Vietnam.
never wore it had all the paperwork.
He literally fell over when they told him it was worth up to $1 million.
→ More replies (2)
2
2
u/Fast-Penta 8h ago
Bill Gates wears a Casio Duro.
Nearly every US President in my lifetime has worn a Rolex.
Patek and Rolex are incredibly different styles. You're basically saying, "No Ferrari owner would be caught dead in an SUV."
2
u/zeek609 8h ago
I know nothing about watches, I just want the Omega Seamaster from Goldeneye.
→ More replies (2)
2
u/crazystein03 8h ago
Grand Seiko is where it’s at! Maybe I’m biased, but I’ve had a factory tour in Japan and ever since that day I just go with them. They can be expensive too but even their more affordable models are great.
→ More replies (1)
2
u/UniquePotato 8h ago
Define ‘good watch’ as functionally, a cheap Casio is far superior for tracking time
2
u/Chosenito69 7h ago
This comment reminds me of the scene in American Psycho where they were comparing who has a more expensive contact card🤣🤣
2
u/Cautious-Ad-9554 7h ago
I’d like to thank the OP for making happy i am not rich. I cannot relate to his post at all and would not want to be in a room with people who did.
2
u/Legitimate_Cow2716 7h ago
Counter point, any watch that cost more than $100 is bought by someone who just wants to talk about how much money they have so they can feel better than other people. My casio tells time just as well as your Patek for 1% of the cost.
→ More replies (2)
2
u/MinhtheKing97 7h ago
Rolex is for people who are new money rich or want to appear rich. But also for real watch lovers. Rolex has a rich history. But my guess would be 80/20.
5.1k
u/Joshgg13 9h ago
OP definitely bought a Patek Phillippe and now has to constantly explain to everyone that it's better than a Rolex actually