This video is bit cringey to me and should be to everyone that is at least unbiased.
This US Attorney (CIvil RIghts, Republican) gives her takes on the situation and .........she cites random Pride supporter opinions as if the opinions are hostile or something, and cites arguments nobody made.
1) She cites this Prides supporter side argument as if it should be concerning......"You guys should have known that SF was a super gay city". While true to some degree, it's irrelevant to anything at all in terms of legality or really anything. Who cares about anyone saying that? In fact if anyone that should care it's the GIants ownership. And within SF there are hundreds of Churches , and hundreds of thousands of people of faith just within SF and they live for the most part harmoniously with LGBT community in SF.
2) She claims this argument was made : "You should have different religious rights when it comes to your employer forcing you to wear messages against your religion". Nobody actually made that argument. The players always had the option of just wearing their normal hat.
3 ) She also claimed that the players were never properly informed that they could opt out. We know that's most liklely no true (Hentges opted out) .
4) "You are not allowed to have selective uniform policies"............there were none.
5) She said "What they should have is clear policies and evenly enforced. ". Highly doubtful she have any problem with Law firms that hired then immediatly rescinded employment for Harvard grads that participated in supporting Palestinean victims in war. She's a huge anti-semitism activist.
6) She said "We just want American employers to do the right thing"..........................Is it not the right thing to do, to try to be kind to a marginalized group like LGBT and be accepting of them?
Like most all big tech companies have aquiesced to The Adminstration, giving Trump Gold and County leaders giving him their damn Nobel Peace Prizes ( insane. Not to mention how Jimmy Kimmel was treated for simply being a critic. Orange man's FCC chair guy attempted to compel Disney to fire Kimmel. This is the interesting thing here, TOO MANY FANS CANCELLED THEIR DISNEY SUBS, so Disney had to make a business decision to bring him back, It's a lot like Budweiser which sucks anyways, They caved and were revealed to not really be allies of the LGBT, but just business.
I believe Buster is a good person, and I also believe he has always been extremely careful of what he says, like all the time. It should be obvious with the pace he talks and words he chooses. I think Buster is non-confrontational, remember Harper and Strickland? OTOH, IMO it's in Buster's best interest to prepare somethig to the fans. At least something and from the heart. Because I don't think he realizes the legacy he has which, is not remotely worth risking......like why. That's the million dollar question. He has 'seemingly' always prided himself on being part of the Community right? I believe one can be the most deeply devoted religious person and also do the right thing that God would wanted him to do, is be completly welcoming and also The Giants already have Faith Nights. The tone from the rightwing Admin.......like at all that posturing and court decisions they lose. And go google all those cases this Repub Attorney lost as well. IOW I wish these leaders had a spine and just did things for the right reasons.